Skip to content
Scanned
2026-04-07 20:08 UTC
Worker
🇧🇷 Sao Paulo
Duration
3.6m
Vs prev

Audit overview

4 categories need attention: Security, and 3 others.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

2

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

3

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

Cookie 'bm_sz' is missing the Secure flag

A cookie without the Secure flag can leak over HTTP — in HSTS-protected sites, this is still a defense-in-depth gap.

Security › Cookie Security
Critical: 3

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 4

No favicon or icon links detected

Without a favicon, your tab shows a blank icon and bookmarks look unbranded — amateur signal in every browser surface.

Accessibility › Favicon & Branding
Warning: 5

232 HTTP requests — consider bundling or reducing

High HTTP request count — bundling, sprite-ing, and HTTP/2 server push can reduce per-request overhead.

Performance › Page Weight Budget
What fixing these means. Your site has several issues that may be affecting user experience and business outcomes. Your LCP of 6.9s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 1 performance issue below directly contributes to it. Accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology — an estimated 15% of your potential audience. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
3 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
1 accessibility issue excludes users who rely on assistive technology.
Your LCP is 6.9s — fixing the 1 performance critical could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

$1,075 investment → $13,176/month returns + USD 150,000 risk avoided

Investment
$1,075
10.8 h · 5 findings
Monthly returns
$13,176
$158,108/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+14608% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided USD 150,000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
$6250.0 mo payback · +25197% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
$75 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

8 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~30%.

Barriers
8
2 crit 6 warn
Bounce delta
+30pp
added vs baseline
Score
62
C
Speed
2
Trust
2
Usability
0
Content
3
Nav
1
  • Page takes 6.9s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 4.4s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • Page feels frozen for 5.6s
    Clicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs
    → Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • No Open Graph tags
    Links shared on LinkedIn / Slack / Facebook show bare URLs — referral clicks drop
    → Add og:title, og:description, og:image, og:url to the page head

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

$1,075 10.8 developer hours at $100/hr
Quick wins
$75 2 fixes in ~45 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

$ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

$7,982 / month at risk ~$95,790 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

$150,000

ADA Title III
  • No <nav> landmark found
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
  • Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
  • No headings found
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000

Bounce-Rate Cost

$7,982 /mo

+29.7pp bounce · ~2,967 lost visitors/mo

CPC: USD 2.69

Bandwidth Waste

$0.85 /mo

10631.7 MB/mo × 0.080 USD/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~1.1 MB per page load
    Saves $0.85/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 4 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Categories

8
Avg score 69.0

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Akamai Bot Manager · 36 peers
You 69
·
Avg 71
At average
0 50 100
Better than 11% of Akamai Bot Manager sites See full Akamai Bot Manager benchmark →
HSTS · 2602 peers
You 69
·
Avg 75
-6 below average
0 50 100
SEO P5Content P10Sustainability P14Security P15Compliance P20Accessibility P24Performance P36Infrastructure P52

Top 10% of HSTS sites score 96+ on SEO; you're at 70 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 3% of HSTS sites See full HSTS benchmark →

Technology stack

Akamai Bot Manager, with Akamai CDN

4 technologies detected 2 stack layers Standard

Stack Architecture

Framework
Akamai Bot Manager HSTS HTTP/3
CDN
Akamai

All Detected Technologies (4)

Akamai is global content delivery network (CDN) services provider for media and software delivery, and cloud security solutions.

Categories CDN Website https://akamai.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Akamai Bot Manager detect bots using device fingerprinting bot signatures.

Categories Security Website https://www.akamai.com/us/en/products/security/bot-manager.jsp Detected by BeaverCheck

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

HTTP/3 is the third major version of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol used to exchange information on the World Wide Web.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://httpwg.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (1)

No build tool detected

A framework (Akamai Bot Manager) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.hilton.com)](https://beavercheck.com/results/94009c4a-430f-5933-591c-94550f6f1ea1)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/94009c4a-430f-5933-591c-94550f6f1ea1"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.hilton.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.hilton.com

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 11h total → projected C (77)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+4

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

2 findings 1h → C (73)
  • · Cookie 'bm_sz' is missing the Secure flag
  • · No favicon or icon links detected

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+4

Medium effort, high structural impact

3 findings 10h → C (77)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found
  • · 232 HTTP requests — consider bundling or reducing

Send Feedback