Skip to content
NL · EUR (€) · Estimated Applicable regulations: AVG · ePrivacy Directive · EAA Dev cost: €85/hr How jurisdiction is detected
Scanned
2026-04-22 00:37 UTC
Worker
🇳🇱 Amsterdam
Duration
1.1m
Vs prev

Audit overview

3 categories need attention: Accessibility, and 2 others.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

5

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

0

High impact, requires investment.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Cookie 'TS01c970c1' is missing the Secure flag

A cookie without the Secure flag can leak over HTTP — in HSTS-protected sites, this is still a defense-in-depth gap.

Security › Cookie Security
Critical: 2

No <main> landmark found

Without a <main> landmark, screen-reader users can't skip past the navigation to the page content — every page starts with re-reading the menu.

Accessibility › Landmark Structure
Warning: 3

Cookie 'TS01c970c1' has no SameSite attribute

Without SameSite, cookies ride along on cross-site requests — enabling CSRF attacks that SameSite=Lax blocks for free.

Security › Cookie Security
Warning: 4

Cookie 'TS01c970c1' is missing the HttpOnly flag

Without HttpOnly, JavaScript can read the cookie — an XSS bug becomes a session-stealing attack.

Security › Cookie Security
Warning: 5

Cookie '__Secure-PROFILE' has no SameSite attribute

Without SameSite, cookies ride along on cross-site requests — enabling CSRF attacks that SameSite=Lax blocks for free.

Security › Cookie Security
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology — an estimated 15% of your potential audience. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
4 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
1 accessibility issue excludes users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

€99 investment → €8,793/month returns + EUR 120,500,000 risk avoided

Investment
€99
1.2 h · 5 findings
Monthly returns
€8.793
€105.512/yr
Payback
0.0 mo
+106299% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided EUR 120.500.000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
€570.0 mo payback · +186098% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

7 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~35%.

Barriers
7
2 crit 5 warn
Bounce delta
+35pp
added vs baseline
Score
65
C
Speed
2
Trust
0
Usability
1
Content
3
Nav
1
  • Page takes 12.2s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 9.7s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • No viewport meta tag
    Mobile browsers render at desktop width and shrink — text unreadable, tap targets miniature
    → Add <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1">
  • High main-thread blocking time
    Page is non-interactive for 339ms after first paint
    → Defer third-party scripts and split large bundles
  • No Open Graph tags
    Links shared on LinkedIn / Slack / Facebook show bare URLs — referral clicks drop
    → Add og:title, og:description, og:image, og:url to the page head
  • No structured data
    No rich-result eligibility in Google — lower SERP CTR vs competitors with stars and prices
    → Add JSON-LD for your page type (Product, Article, FAQPage, LocalBusiness, …)

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

€99 1.2 developer hours at €85/hr
Quick wins
€99 5 fixes in ~70 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

/hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

€7.796 / month at risk ~€93.552 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

€120.500.000

ePrivacy DirectiveAVGEAA
  • No privacy policy link detected
    AVG: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000
  • Trackers detected but no cookie policy found
    AVG: EUR 5.000 – EUR 10.000.000
  • Trackers detected but no cookie policy found
    AVG: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000

Bounce-Rate Cost

€7.795 /mo

+35.4pp bounce · ~3,543 lost visitors/mo

CPC: EUR 2.20

Bandwidth Waste

€0,48 /mo

6509.9 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~651 KB per page load
    Saves €0,48/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 2 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

66
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
100
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.82 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

12.18 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

339 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.059

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

2.10 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

12.33 s

Desktop

89
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
100
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

456 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

2.22 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

29 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.014

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

640 ms

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

2.24 s

Categories

8
Avg score 75.8

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Drupal · 367 peers
You 78
·
Avg 73
At average
0 50 100
Better than 90% of Drupal sites See full Drupal benchmark →
HSTS · 2620 peers
You 78
·
Avg 75
At average
0 50 100
Security P92Content P10Compliance P12Infrastructure P88SEO P13Accessibility P27Performance P72Sustainability P46

Top 10% of HSTS sites score 96+ on Content; you're at 68 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 70% of HSTS sites See full HSTS benchmark →

Technology stack

Drupal, on PHP

4 technologies detected 3 stack layers 2 with CPE identifier Standard

Stack Architecture

CMS
Drupal
Framework
HSTS Microsoft
Runtime
PHP

All Detected Technologies (4)

PHP is a general-purpose scripting language used for web development.

Categories Programming languages Website https://php.net Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Drupal is a free and open-source web content management framework.

Categories CMS Website https://www.drupal.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Header: X-Drupal-Cache present
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Low Evidence TXT record: MS=ms56762741

Observations (1)

No build tool detected

A framework (HSTS) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fautoriteitpersoonsgegevens.nl)](https://beavercheck.com/sites/autoriteitpersoonsgegevens.nl)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/autoriteitpersoonsgegevens.nl"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fautoriteitpersoonsgegevens.nl" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fautoriteitpersoonsgegevens.nl

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

1 sprints · 1h total → projected B (83)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+5

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

5 findings 1h → B (83)
  • · No <main> landmark found
  • · Cookie 'TS01c970c1' is missing the Secure flag
  • · Cookie 'TS01c970c1' has no SameSite attribute
  • · Cookie 'TS01c970c1' is missing the HttpOnly flag
  • · Cookie '__Secure-PROFILE' has no SameSite attribute

Send Feedback