Skip to content
Scanned
2026-09-06 10:43 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
44.00s
Vs prev

Global Performance

6/6 locations

High global latency — average 804ms across 6 locations, fastest from New York (267ms), slowest from Singapore (1322ms). Cloudflare in front. Cache-Control disables caching (no-store). 5 locations above the 500ms target.

Spain - Madrid
Full audit
872ms
DNS 34ms · TLS 23ms
United Stated - New York
267ms
DNS 7ms · TLS 12ms
United States - Santa Clara
554ms
DNS 8ms · TLS 11ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
724ms
DNS 7ms · TLS 11ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
1086ms
DNS 6ms · TLS 8ms
Singapore - Singapore
1322ms
DNS 7ms · TLS 10ms
CDN: Cloudflare · Avg TTFB: 804ms · Cache: no-store

Audit overview

All categories sit comfortably above the 70 threshold; this is a clean audit.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

3

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

2

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Your mail setup has problems.

manus.space fails 2 mail checks: No DMARC record found, No SPF record found. This is the kind of misconfiguration that sends your mail to spam.

Get a full deliverability audit — €179, 48h →

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 3

Soft 404: server returns HTTP 200 for non-existent pages

Soft 404s (HTTP 200 for missing pages) confuse Google — it indexes the 'not found' page as real content and ranks it.

Accessibility › 404 Error Page
Warning: 4

1 publicly-accessible JavaScript source map(s)

Source maps reveal original source code (variable names, comments, file structure) and are shipped to production by mistake almost universally. The standard fix is a one-line build-tool config change.

Security › Source Map Exposure
Warning: 5

22 third-party resources (88% of weight)

Informational: third-party resource count and their share of page weight. High share caps perf gains from frontend optimization.

Performance › Page Weight Inventory
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Your LCP of 12.9s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 1 performance issue below directly contributes to it. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
3 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
1 accessibility issue excludes users who rely on assistive technology.
Your LCP is 12.9s — fixing the 1 performance critical could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

€595 investment → €7,894/month returns + EUR 20,500,000 risk avoided

Investment
€595
7.0 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
€7.894
€94.724/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+15820% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided EUR 20.500.000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
€5530.1 mo payback · +17045% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
€85 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

7 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~29%.

Barriers
7
2 crit 5 warn
Bounce delta
+29pp
added vs baseline
Score
65
C
Speed
2
Trust
1
Usability
1
Content
1
Nav
2
  • Page takes 12.9s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 10.4s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • Page feels frozen for 898ms
    Clicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs
    → Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • Viewport disables user zoom
    Visitors with low vision can't read the page — and some jurisdictions treat this as a legal risk
    → Remove user-scalable=no; drop maximum-scale if it's below 2
  • No structured data
    No rich-result eligibility in Google — lower SERP CTR vs competitors with stars and prices
    → Add JSON-LD for your page type (Product, Article, FAQPage, LocalBusiness, …)

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

€595 7.0 developer hours at €85/hr
Quick wins
€85 2 fixes in ~60 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

/hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

€6.428 / month at risk ~€77.133 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

€20.500.000

GDPREAA
  • Privacy Policy not detected
    GDPR: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000
  • Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)
    EAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000
  • 1 heading(s) contain placeholder / generic text
    EAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000

Bounce-Rate Cost

€6.427 /mo

+29.2pp bounce · ~2,921 lost visitors/mo

CPC: EUR 2.20

Bandwidth Waste

€0,50 /mo

6704.5 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~670 KB per page load
    Saves €0,50/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 3 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

46
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
90
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
77
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
69
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

3.40 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

12.87 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

898 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

3.94 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

12.87 s

Desktop

82
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
90
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
77
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
69
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.09 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

2.35 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

149 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

1.38 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

2.35 s

Categories

8
Avg score 80.9

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Google Cloud Trace · 39 peers
You 81
·
Avg 75
+6 above average
0 50 100
Better than 87% of Google Cloud Trace sites See full Google Cloud Trace benchmark →
Google Font API · 1257 peers
You 81
·
Avg 75
+6 above average
0 50 100
SEO P10Accessibility P86Security P85Compliance P21Sustainability P79Performance P77Infrastructure P27Content P29

Top 10% of Google Font API sites score 97+ on SEO; you're at 86 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 84% of Google Font API sites See full Google Font API benchmark →

Technology stack

Google Cloud Trace, on Node.js, hosted on Express, with Cloudflare CDN

14 technologies detected 5 stack layers 4 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Analytics
Plausible Umami Vercel Speed Insights
Framework
Google Cloud Trace Google Font API HSTS Lucide Open Graph Plausible Analytics lit-html 3.3.1
Runtime
Node.js
CDN
Cloudflare
Hosting
Express Google Cloud

All Detected Technologies (14)

Cloudflare is a web-infrastructure and website-security company, providing content-delivery-network services, DDoS mitigation, Internet security, and distributed domain-name-server services.

Categories CDN Website https://www.cloudflare.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header in redirect: cloudflare
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Express is a web application framework for Node.js, released as free and open-source software under the MIT License. It is designed for building web applications and APIs.

Categories Web frameworks, Web servers Website https://expressjs.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence X-Powered-By: Express in redirect
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Google Cloud is a suite of cloud computing services.

Categories IaaS Website https://cloud.google.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Node.js is an open-source, cross-platform, JavaScript runtime environment that executes JavaScript code outside a web browser.

Categories Programming languages Website https://nodejs.org Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Google Cloud Trace is a distributed tracing system that collects latency data from applications and displays it in the Google Cloud Console.

Categories Performance Website https://cloud.google.com/trace Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Font API is a web service that supports open-source font files that can be used on your web designs.

Categories Font scripts Website https://fonts.google.com/ Detected by BeaverCheck

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

Lucide is an open-source icon library that provides 1000+ vector (svg) files for displaying icons and symbols in digital and non-digital projects.

Categories Font scripts Website https://lucide.dev Detected by BeaverCheck

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL contains plausible.io: https://plausible.io/js/script.file-downloads.hash.outbound-links.pageview-props.revenue.tagged-events.js

lit-html is a simple, modern, safe, small and fast HTML templating library for JavaScript.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://lit.dev Detected by BeaverCheck

Plausible is an open-source alternative to Google Analytics.

Categories Analytics Website https://plausible.io/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Umami is a self-hosted web analytics solution. It's goal is to provide a friendlier, privacy-focused alternative to Google Analytics and a free, open-sourced alternative to paid solutions.

Categories Analytics Website https://umami.is/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Vercel Speed Insights provides you with a detailed view of your website's performance metrics, based on Core Web Vitals.

Categories Analytics Website https://vercel.com/docs/speed-insights Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (2)

No build tool detected

A framework (Google Cloud Trace) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

14 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Forigopg-mwnz8lgk.manus.space)](https://beavercheck.com/sites/manus.space)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/manus.space"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Forigopg-mwnz8lgk.manus.space" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Forigopg-mwnz8lgk.manus.space

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 7h total → projected B (88)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+4

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

3 findings 1h → B (85)
  • · Soft 404: server returns HTTP 200 for non-existent pages
  • · 22 third-party resources (88% of weight)
  • · 1 publicly-accessible JavaScript source map(s)

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+3

Medium effort, high structural impact

2 findings 6h → B (88)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found

Send Feedback