Skip to content
Scanned
2026-10-25 08:21 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
45.00s
Vs prev
—

Global Performance

6/6 locations ✓

Acceptable global latency — average 335ms across 6 locations, fastest from New York (49ms), slowest from Singapore (821ms). Assets on AWS CloudFront (host irp.cdn-website.com, 23 assets); document served directly from origin. 2 locations above the 500ms target.

Spain - Madrid
Full audit
155ms
DNS 63ms · TLS 60ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
67ms
DNS 28ms · TLS 22ms
United States - Santa Clara
293ms
DNS 42ms · TLS 123ms
United Stated - New York
49ms
DNS 17ms · TLS 17ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
624ms
DNS 283ms · TLS 226ms
Singapore - Singapore
821ms
DNS 298ms · TLS 348ms
CDN: AWS CloudFront (assets only) · Avg TTFB: 335ms · Cache: no-cache, must-revalidate

Audit overview

Compliance needs attention; the rest of the categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

2

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

3

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Your mail setup has problems.

mastertechca.com fails 2 mail checks: No DMARC record found, No SPF record found. This is the kind of misconfiguration that sends your mail to spam.

Get a full deliverability audit — €179, 48h →

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

7 button(s) with no accessible text

Buttons with no accessible text (icon-only, no aria-label) can't be activated by voice control or understood by screen readers.

Accessibility › Link & Button Quality
Warning: 2

1 render-blocking <script src> tag(s) without async/defer

Performance issues directly impact user engagement and conversion rates.

Performance › JavaScript Blocking
Warning: 3

10 `@font-face` rule(s) without `font-display` -- causes FOIT

Performance issues directly impact user engagement and conversion rates.

Performance › CSS Performance Depth
Warning: 4

108 inline style attribute(s) detected

Inline style attributes force `style-src 'unsafe-inline'` in any CSP -- effectively negating CSP's XSS-mitigation value for stylesheets.

Security › CSP Inline-Style Readiness
Warning: 5

4 link(s) open in a new tab without rel=noopener

target="_blank" without rel="noopener" lets the destination tab navigate the original via window.opener -- a reverse-tabnabbing phishing primitive.

Security › Cross-Origin Tab Safety
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Your LCP of 5.8s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 2 performance issues below directly contribute to it. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your audience reach.
1 accessibility issue excludes users who rely on assistive technology.
Your LCP is 5.8s — fixing the 2 performance criticals could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.
2 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

$875 investment → $8,919/month returns + USD 157,500 risk avoided

Investment
$875
8.8 h · 5 findings
Monthly returns
$8,919
$107,030/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+12132% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided USD 157,500
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
$450 → 0.1 mo payback · +23684% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
$75 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

5 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~23%.

Barriers
5
1 crit 4 warn
Bounce delta
+23pp
added vs baseline
Score
78
B
Speed
2
Trust
0
Usability
0
Content
1
Nav
2
  • Page takes 5.8s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 3.3s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • High main-thread blocking time
    Page is non-interactive for 470ms after first paint
    → Defer third-party scripts and split large bundles
  • No structured data
    No rich-result eligibility in Google — lower SERP CTR vs competitors with stars and prices
    → Add JSON-LD for your page type (Product, Article, FAQPage, LocalBusiness, …)
  • 7 link(s) with generic text ("click here", "read more")
    Screen-reader users navigating by link list see no context — and search engines can't infer relevance
    → Rewrite with descriptive phrases that identify the destination
  • No skip-to-content link
    Keyboard and screen-reader users must tab through the entire header on every page
    → Add a visible-on-focus <a href="#main">Skip to content</a> as the first focusable element

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

$875 8.8 developer hours at $100/hr
Quick wins
$75 2 fixes in ~45 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

$ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

$6,069 / month at risk ~$72,825 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

$157,500

ADA Title IIICCPA/CPRA
  • No privacy policy found (page links and common paths checked)
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • Trackers detected but no cookie policy found
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • Trackers detected but no privacy policy found
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500

Bounce-Rate Cost

$6,068 /mo

+22.6pp bounce · ~2,256 lost visitors/mo

CPC: USD 2.69

Bandwidth Waste

$0.29 /mo

3607.4 MB/mo × 0.080 USD/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~361 KB per page load
    Saves $0.29/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 1 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

67
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
90
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.03 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

5.82 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

470 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.045

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

1.97 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

5.83 s

Desktop

93
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
92
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

494 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

1.69 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

45 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.065

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

810 ms

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

1.70 s

Categories

8
Avg score 81.5

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Duda · 5 peers
You 82
·
Avg 80
At average
0 50 100
Better than 80% of Duda sites See full Duda benchmark →
HSTS · 3362 peers
You 82
·
Avg 78
At average
0 50 100
Compliance P4Security P71Performance P70Accessibility P67Infrastructure P36Sustainability P61SEO P57Content P49

Top 10% of HSTS sites score 87+ on Compliance; you're at 63 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 73% of HSTS sites See full HSTS benchmark →

Technology stack

Duda production_6862, hosted on Snowplow Analytics, with Nginx CDN

12 technologies detected 4 stack layers 2 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

CMS
Duda production_6862
Framework
HSTS MobX Open Graph PhotoSwipe Priority Hints Tailwind CSS Underscore.js 4.18.1 jQuery 3.7.0 jQuery Migrate 3.5.2
CDN
Nginx
Hosting
Snowplow Analytics

All Detected Technologies (12)

Nginx is a web server that can also be used as a reverse proxy, load balancer, mail proxy and HTTP cache.

Categories Web servers, Reverse proxies Website https://nginx.org/en Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header: nginx
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Snowplow is an open-source behavioral data management platform for businesses.

Categories Analytics, IaaS Website https://snowplowanalytics.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Duda is a user-friendly website builder and CMS platform that enables businesses and individuals to create responsive, mobile-friendly websites without extensive coding knowledge.

Categories CMS, Page builders Website https://www.duda.co Detected by BeaverCheck

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://mobx.js.org Detected by BeaverCheck

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

PhotoSwipe is an open-source gallery to support JavaScript-based image zooming.

Categories Photo galleries, JavaScript libraries Website https://photoswipe.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Priority Hints exposes a mechanism for developers to signal a relative priority for browsers to consider when fetching resources.

Categories Performance Website https://wicg.github.io/priority-hints/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Tailwind is a utility-first CSS framework for rapidly building custom user interfaces.

Categories UI frameworks Website https://tailwindcss.com/ Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Found 58 unique Tailwind utility classes in HTML

Underscore.js is a JavaScript library which provides utility functions for common programming tasks. It is comparable to features provided by Prototype.js and the Ruby language, but opts for a functional programming design instead of extending object prototypes.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://underscorejs.org Detected by BeaverCheck

jQuery is a JavaScript library which is a free, open-source software designed to simplify HTML DOM tree traversal and manipulation, as well as event handling, CSS animation, and Ajax.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://jquery.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Query Migrate is a javascript library that allows you to preserve the compatibility of your jQuery code developed for versions of jQuery older than 1.9.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://github.com/jquery/jquery-migrate Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (2)

No build tool detected

A framework (HSTS) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

12 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.mastertechca.com)](https://beavercheck.com/sites/mastertechca.com)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/mastertechca.com"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.mastertechca.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.mastertechca.com

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 9h total → projected B (88)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+3

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

2 findings 1h → B (85)
  • · 7 button(s) with no accessible text
  • · 4 link(s) open in a new tab without rel=noopener

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+3

Medium effort, high structural impact

3 findings 8h → B (88)
  • · 1 render-blocking <script src> tag(s) without async/defer
  • · 10 `@font-face` rule(s) without `font-display` -- causes FOIT
  • · 108 inline style attribute(s) detected

Send Feedback