Skip to content
IN · INR (₹) · Estimated Applicable regulations: DPDP Act Dev cost: ₹1,500/hr How jurisdiction is detected
Scanned
2026-05-10 15:20 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
1.2m
Vs prev

Global Performance

6/6 locations

High global latency — average 1644ms across 6 locations, fastest from New York (907ms), slowest from Sao Paulo (2234ms). Cloudflare edge cache (DYNAMIC). Cache-Control header is missing. 6 locations above the 500ms target.

Spain - Madrid
Full audit
1195ms
DNS 56ms · TLS 22ms
United Stated - New York
907ms
DNS 9ms · TLS 12ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
1626ms
DNS 13ms · TLS 10ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
2234ms
DNS 10ms · TLS 11ms
United States - Santa Clara
1922ms
DNS 855ms · TLS 13ms
Singapore - Singapore
1978ms
DNS 11ms · TLS 93ms
CDN: Cloudflare (DYNAMIC) · Avg TTFB: 1644ms · Cache: No cache headers

Audit overview

Compliance needs attention; the rest of the categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

4

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

1

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Page body has only 67 chars of text -- likely empty / placeholder

Security gaps expose your site and users to attacks, eroding trust.

Security › Empty Page Detection
Critical: 2

Missing <html lang> attribute (WCAG 3.1.1)

Missing <html lang> attribute -- screen readers default to the user's system language and pronounce content with the wrong phonetics.

Accessibility › Document Language
Critical: 3

No <main> landmark found

Without a <main> landmark, screen-reader users can't skip past the navigation to the page content — every page starts with re-reading the menu.

Accessibility › Landmark Structure
Critical: 4

No favicon or icon links detected

Without a favicon, your tab shows a blank icon and bookmarks look unbranded — amateur signal in every browser surface.

Accessibility › Favicon & Branding
Warning: 5

Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing

COEP enforces that all embedded resources opt-in to cross-origin embedding — required for cross-origin isolation features.

Security › Security Headers
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
2 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
3 accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

₹3,375 investment → ₹145,494/month returns + INR 2,500,000,000 risk avoided

Investment
₹3,375
2.3 h · 5 findings
Monthly returns
₹145,494
₹1,745,925/yr
Payback
0.0 mo
+51631% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided INR 2,500,000,000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
₹1,1250.0 mo payback · +155093% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
₹1,875 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

7 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~35%.

Barriers
7
2 crit 5 warn
Bounce delta
+35pp
added vs baseline
Score
65
C
Speed
1
Trust
1
Usability
1
Content
3
Nav
1
  • Page takes 4.8s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 2.3s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • No viewport meta tag
    Mobile browsers render at desktop width and shrink — text unreadable, tap targets miniature
    → Add <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1">
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • No Open Graph tags
    Links shared on LinkedIn / Slack / Facebook show bare URLs — referral clicks drop
    → Add og:title, og:description, og:image, og:url to the page head
  • No structured data
    No rich-result eligibility in Google — lower SERP CTR vs competitors with stars and prices
    → Add JSON-LD for your page type (Product, Article, FAQPage, LocalBusiness, …)

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

₹3,375 2.3 developer hours at ₹1500/hr
Quick wins
₹1,875 4 fixes in ~75 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

/hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Cost of inaction

₹208,438,174 / month at risk ~₹2,501,258,088 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

₹2,500,000,000

DPDP Act
  • No privacy policy link detected
    DPDP Act: INR 10,000 – INR 2,500,000,000
  • Privacy Policy not detected
    DPDP Act: INR 10,000 – INR 2,500,000,000

Bounce-Rate Cost

₹104,821 /mo

+34.9pp bounce · ~3,494 lost visitors/mo

CPC: INR 30.00

Bandwidth Waste

₹20 /mo

2972.7 MB/mo × 6.667 INR/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~297 KB per page load
    Saves ₹20/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 4 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

66
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
86
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

2.86 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

4.84 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

13 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.089

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

13.97 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

5.13 s

Desktop

94
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
86
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

517 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

1.07 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.003

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

2.00 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

1.07 s

Categories

8
Avg score 82.1

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

HSTS · 2429 peers
You 84
·
Avg 75
+9 above average
0 50 100
Compliance P2Security P96Accessibility P88Performance P86Sustainability P85Infrastructure P76SEO P29Content P36

Top 10% of HSTS sites score 86+ on Compliance; you're at 62 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 95% of HSTS sites See full HSTS benchmark →
HTTP/3 · 1402 peers
You 84
·
Avg 75
+9 above average
0 50 100
Compliance P1Security P98Accessibility P90Performance P84Sustainability P77Infrastructure P66SEO P40Content P42

Top 10% of HTTP/3 sites score 85+ on Compliance; you're at 62 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 96% of HTTP/3 sites See full HTTP/3 benchmark →

Technology stack

HSTS, on Node.js, hosted on Express, with Cloudflare CDN

6 technologies detected 5 stack layers 4 with CPE identifier Complex

Stack Architecture

Analytics
Hostinger
Framework
HSTS HTTP/3
Runtime
Node.js
CDN
Cloudflare
Hosting
Express

All Detected Technologies (6)

Cloudflare is a web-infrastructure and website-security company, providing content-delivery-network services, DDoS mitigation, Internet security, and distributed domain-name-server services.

Categories CDN Website https://www.cloudflare.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header in redirect: cloudflare
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Express is a web application framework for Node.js, released as free and open-source software under the MIT License. It is designed for building web applications and APIs.

Categories Web frameworks, Web servers Website https://expressjs.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence X-Powered-By: Express in redirect
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Node.js is an open-source, cross-platform, JavaScript runtime environment that executes JavaScript code outside a web browser.

Categories Programming languages Website https://nodejs.org Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

HTTP/3 is the third major version of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol used to exchange information on the World Wide Web.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://httpwg.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Hostinger is an employee-owned Web hosting provider and internet domain registrar.

Categories Hosting Website https://www.hostinger.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Observations (1)

No build tool detected

A framework (HSTS) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmpsupply.co.in)](https://beavercheck.com/results/96e67cda-2934-4b9d-a44a-0bf3990d1193)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/96e67cda-2934-4b9d-a44a-0bf3990d1193"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmpsupply.co.in" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmpsupply.co.in

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 2h total → projected A (91)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+6

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

4 findings 1h → A (90)
  • · Missing <html lang> attribute (WCAG 3.1.1)
  • · No <main> landmark found
  • · Page body has only 67 chars of text -- likely empty / placeholder
  • · No favicon or icon links detected

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+1

Medium effort, high structural impact

1 findings 1h → A (91)
  • · Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing

Send Feedback