Skip to content
Scanned
2026-04-07 20:14 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
1.2m
Vs prev

Audit overview

3 categories need attention: Accessibility, and 2 others.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

4

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

1

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

'unsafe-eval' found in script source

Unsafe value (unsafe-inline, unsafe-eval) in script-src defeats CSP's main protection — XSS injections can execute again.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 2

Page weighs 11.5 MB (4.3 MB transferred)

Informational: total page weight (uncompressed) and bytes actually transferred over the wire.

Performance › Page Weight Budget
Critical: 3

16 link(s) with no accessible text

Links with no accessible text (empty <a></a>, image-only no alt, icon-only no aria-label) are unidentifiable to screen readers.

Accessibility › Link & Button Quality
Critical: 4

2 button(s) with no accessible text

Buttons with no accessible text (icon-only, no aria-label) can't be activated by voice control or understood by screen readers.

Accessibility › Link & Button Quality
Critical: 5

No <main> landmark found

Without a <main> landmark, screen-reader users can't skip past the navigation to the page content — every page starts with re-reading the menu.

Accessibility › Landmark Structure
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Your LCP of 20.5s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 1 performance issue below directly contributes to it. Accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology — an estimated 15% of your potential audience. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
1 security gap detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
Your LCP is 20.5s — fixing the 1 performance critical could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.
3 accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

€609 investment → €6,770/month returns + EUR 120,500,000 risk avoided

Investment
€609
7.2 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
€6.770
€81.245/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+13237% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided EUR 120.500.000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
€5950.1 mo payback · +13555% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
€99 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

9 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~31%.

Barriers
9
2 crit 7 warn
Bounce delta
+31pp
added vs baseline
Score
59
C
Speed
2
Trust
1
Usability
0
Content
3
Nav
3
  • Page takes 20.5s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 18.0s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • Page feels frozen for 3.7s
    Clicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs
    → Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • No Open Graph tags
    Links shared on LinkedIn / Slack / Facebook show bare URLs — referral clicks drop
    → Add og:title, og:description, og:image, og:url to the page head
  • No structured data
    No rich-result eligibility in Google — lower SERP CTR vs competitors with stars and prices
    → Add JSON-LD for your page type (Product, Article, FAQPage, LocalBusiness, …)

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

€609 7.2 developer hours at €85/hr
Quick wins
€99 3 fixes in ~70 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

/hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

€6.770 / month at risk ~€81.245 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

€120.500.000

ePrivacy DirectiveGDPREAA
  • No privacy policy link detected
    GDPR: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000
  • Trackers detected but no cookie policy found
    GDPR: EUR 5.000 – EUR 10.000.000
  • Trackers detected but no cookie policy found
    GDPR: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000

Bounce-Rate Cost

€6.769 /mo

+30.8pp bounce · ~3,077 lost visitors/mo

CPC: EUR 2.20

Bandwidth Waste

€1,01 /mo

13600.9 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~1.4 MB per page load
    Saves €1,01/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

26
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
92
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
73
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
83
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

12.27 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

20.49 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

3.71 s

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

12.27 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

21.02 s

Desktop

27
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
71
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
77
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

2.03 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

8.80 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

615 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.164

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

4.21 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

9.14 s

Categories

8
Avg score 71.5

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Arkose Labs · 10 peers
You 71
·
Avg 75
At average
0 50 100
core-js · 1582 peers
You 71
·
Avg 72
At average
0 50 100
SEO P4Content P9Security P85Accessibility P29Infrastructure P31Sustainability P32Compliance P44Performance P47

Top 10% of core-js sites score 95+ on SEO; you're at 79 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 24% of core-js sites See full core-js benchmark →

Technology stack

Arkose Labs, on Emotion, hosted on Amazon Web Services, with Amazon S3 CDN

17 technologies detected 5 stack layers 2 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Analytics
Linkedin Insight Tag PayPal
Framework
Arkose Labs Google Play app HSTS Loadable-Components Open Graph PWA Priority Hints core-js 3.24.0 hCaptcha lit-element 3.2.2 lit-html 2.3.1
Runtime
Emotion
CDN
Amazon S3 Nginx
Hosting
Amazon Web Services

All Detected Technologies (17)

Amazon S3 or Amazon Simple Storage Service is a service offered by Amazon Web Services (AWS) that provides object storage through a web service interface.

Categories CDN Website https://aws.amazon.com/s3/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Nginx is a web server that can also be used as a reverse proxy, load balancer, mail proxy and HTTP cache.

Categories Web servers, Reverse proxies Website https://nginx.org/en Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header: nginx
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Amazon Web Services (AWS) is a comprehensive cloud services platform offering compute power, database storage, content delivery and other functionality.

Categories PaaS Website https://aws.amazon.com/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Emotion is a library designed for writing CSS styles with JavaScript.

Categories JavaScript frameworks, Development Website https://emotion.sh Detected by BeaverCheck

Arkose Labs is a toolkit for fraud prevention that provides solutions to detect and mitigate malicious activity across digital platforms.

Categories Security Website https://www.arkoselabs.com Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Other Detected by BeaverCheck · Low Evidence Manifest related_applications includes Google Play app

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

Loadable-Components is a library to solve the React code-splitting client-side and server-side.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://github.com/gregberge/loadable-components Detected by BeaverCheck

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

Progressive Web Apps (PWAs) are web apps built and enhanced with modern APIs to deliver enhanced capabilities, reliability, and installability while reaching anyone, anywhere, on any device, all with a single codebase.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://web.dev/progressive-web-apps/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Priority Hints exposes a mechanism for developers to signal a relative priority for browsers to consider when fetching resources.

Categories Performance Website https://wicg.github.io/priority-hints/ Detected by BeaverCheck

core-js is a modular standard library for JavaScript, with polyfills for cutting-edge ECMAScript features.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://github.com/zloirock/core-js Detected by BeaverCheck

hCaptcha is an anti-bot solution that protects user privacy and rewards websites.

Categories Security Website https://www.hcaptcha.com Detected by BeaverCheck

lit-element is a simple base class for creating web components that work in any web page with any framework. lit-element uses lit-html to render into shadow DOM, and adds API to manage properties and attributes.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://lit.dev Detected by BeaverCheck

lit-html is a simple, modern, safe, small and fast HTML templating library for JavaScript.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://lit.dev Detected by BeaverCheck

LinkedIn Insight Tag is a lightweight JavaScript tag that powers conversion tracking, website audiences, and website demographics.

Categories Analytics Website https://business.linkedin.com/marketing-solutions/insight-tag Detected by BeaverCheck

PayPal is an online payments system that supports online money transfers and serves as an electronic alternative to traditional paper methods like checks and money orders.

Categories Payment processors Website https://paypal.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Observations (2)

No build tool detected

A framework (Arkose Labs) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

17 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.tiktok.com)](https://beavercheck.com/results/97bdd7f2-9c6e-8d93-007f-4e60664422a8)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/97bdd7f2-9c6e-8d93-007f-4e60664422a8"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.tiktok.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.tiktok.com

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 7h total → projected B (80)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+6

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

4 findings 1h → C (77)
  • · Page weighs 11.5 MB (4.3 MB transferred)
  • · No <main> landmark found
  • · 16 link(s) with no accessible text
  • · 2 button(s) with no accessible text

Sprint 3: Strategic Improvements

+3

Higher effort, long-term payoff

1 findings 6h → B (80)
  • · 'unsafe-eval' found in script source

Send Feedback