Skip to content
Scanned
2026-07-31 07:03 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
56.00s
Vs prev

Global Performance

6/6 locations

Acceptable global latency — average 475ms across 6 locations, fastest from Santa Clara (322ms), slowest from Singapore (915ms). No CDN detected. Cache-Control disables caching (no-store). 1 location above the 500ms target.

Spain - Madrid
Full audit
433ms
DNS 41ms · TLS 115ms
United States - Santa Clara
322ms
DNS 14ms · TLS 67ms
United Stated - New York
384ms
DNS 11ms · TLS 29ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
470ms
DNS 16ms · TLS 138ms
Singapore - Singapore
915ms
DNS 168ms · TLS 227ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
330ms
DNS 8ms · TLS 92ms
CDN: No CDN · Avg TTFB: 475ms · Cache: no-store

Audit overview

Sustainability needs attention; the rest of the categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

3

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

2

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

HSTS header is missing

Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 3

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 4

Page weighs 21.7 MB (18.7 MB transferred)

Informational: total page weight (uncompressed) and bytes actually transferred over the wire.

Performance › Page Weight Budget
Critical: 5

2 link(s) with no accessible text

Links with no accessible text (empty <a></a>, image-only no alt, icon-only no aria-label) are unidentifiable to screen readers.

Accessibility › Link & Button Quality
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Your LCP of 18.3s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 1 performance issue below directly contributes to it. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
3 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
Your LCP is 18.3s — fixing the 1 performance critical could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.
1 accessibility issue excludes users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

$675 investment → $6,922/month returns + USD 150,000 risk avoided

Investment
$675
6.8 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
$6,922
$83,069/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+12207% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided USD 150,000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
$6250.1 mo payback · +13191% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
$75 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

6 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~26%.

Barriers
6
2 crit 4 warn
Bounce delta
+26pp
added vs baseline
Score
68
C
Speed
2
Trust
2
Usability
0
Content
0
Nav
2
  • Page takes 18.3s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 15.8s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • Page feels frozen for 656ms
    Clicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs
    → Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • No skip-to-content link
    Keyboard and screen-reader users must tab through the entire header on every page
    → Add a visible-on-focus <a href="#main">Skip to content</a> as the first focusable element

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

$675 6.8 developer hours at $100/hr
Quick wins
$75 2 fixes in ~45 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

$ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

$6,922 / month at risk ~$83,069 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

$150,000

ADA Title III
  • No <main> landmark found
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
  • Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
  • Heading level skipped: H2 → H4 (missing H3)
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000

Bounce-Rate Cost

$6,918 /mo

+25.7pp bounce · ~2,572 lost visitors/mo

CPC: USD 2.69

Bandwidth Waste

$4.72 /mo

58948.0 MB/mo × 0.080 USD/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~5.9 MB per page load
    Saves $4.72/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

42
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
79
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
92
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

5.17 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

18.26 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

656 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.002

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

7.68 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

18.32 s

Desktop

80
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
82
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
92
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.60 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

2.06 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.015

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

2.47 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

2.06 s

Categories

8
Avg score 76.9

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Bootstrap · 963 peers
You 78
·
Avg 74
At average
0 50 100
Sustainability P6Compliance P12Security P87Accessibility P81Infrastructure P44Content P56SEO P55Performance P50

Top 10% of Bootstrap sites score 90+ on Sustainability; you're at 56 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 77% of Bootstrap sites See full Bootstrap benchmark →
Font Awesome · 612 peers
You 78
·
Avg 74
At average
0 50 100
Sustainability P4Compliance P13Security P87Accessibility P80SEO P61Content P61Infrastructure P40Performance P52

Top 10% of Font Awesome sites score 90+ on Sustainability; you're at 56 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 79% of Font Awesome sites See full Font Awesome benchmark →

Technology stack

Bootstrap, hosted on Next.js, with Cloudflare CDN

15 technologies detected 4 stack layers 6 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Analytics
Google Analytics Google Tag Manager Matomo Analytics
Framework
Bootstrap Font Awesome 5.15.4 Google Font API Lodash 4.17.21 Open Graph React Tailwind CSS Webpack
CDN
Cloudflare Nginx 1.14.1 cdnjs
Hosting
Next.js 16.2.10

All Detected Technologies (15)

Cloudflare is a web-infrastructure and website-security company, providing content-delivery-network services, DDoS mitigation, Internet security, and distributed domain-name-server services.

Categories CDN Website https://www.cloudflare.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence NS record: tate.ns.cloudflare.com
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Nginx is a web server that can also be used as a reverse proxy, load balancer, mail proxy and HTTP cache.

Categories Web servers, Reverse proxies Website https://nginx.org/en Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header: nginx/1.14.1
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

cdnjs is a free distributed JS library delivery service.

Categories CDN Website https://cdnjs.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Next.js is a React framework for developing single page Javascript applications.

Categories JavaScript frameworks, Web frameworks, Web servers, Static site generator Website https://nextjs.org Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL: https://inserted.com/_next/static/chunks/polyfills-42372ed130431b0a.js
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →
Categories Framework Website https://getbootstrap.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Found 6 Bootstrap class patterns in HTML

Font Awesome is a font and icon toolkit based on CSS and Less.

Categories Font scripts Website https://fontawesome.com/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Font API is a web service that supports open-source font files that can be used on your web designs.

Categories Font scripts Website https://fonts.google.com/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Lodash is a JavaScript library which provides utility functions for common programming tasks using the functional programming paradigm.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://www.lodash.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

React is an open-source JavaScript library for building user interfaces or UI components.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://reactjs.org Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →
Categories Framework Website https://tailwindcss.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Found 11 unique Tailwind utility classes in HTML

Webpack is an open-source JavaScript module bundler.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://webpack.js.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Analytics is a free web analytics service that tracks and reports website traffic.

Categories Analytics Website https://google.com/analytics Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Tag Manager is a tag management system (TMS) that allows you to quickly and easily update measurement codes and related code fragments collectively known as tags on your website or mobile app.

Categories Tag managers Website https://www.google.com/tagmanager Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL contains www.googletagmanager.com: https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-FRE5M2QD89

Matomo Analytics is a free and open-source web analytics application, that runs on a PHP/MySQL web-server.

Categories Analytics Website https://matomo.org Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Observations (2)

No build tool detected

A framework (Bootstrap) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

15 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Finserted.com)](https://beavercheck.com/sites/inserted.com)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/inserted.com"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Finserted.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Finserted.com

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 7h total → projected B (87)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+6

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

3 findings 1h → B (84)
  • · Page weighs 21.7 MB (18.7 MB transferred)
  • · HSTS header is missing
  • · 2 link(s) with no accessible text

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+3

Medium effort, high structural impact

2 findings 6h → B (87)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found

Send Feedback