Skip to content
Scanned
2026-09-11 18:27 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
33.00s
Vs prev

Global Performance

6/6 locations

Acceptable global latency — average 365ms across 6 locations, fastest from Madrid (144ms), slowest from Sao Paulo (647ms). Assets on Cloudflare (host api.pagepeeker.com, 6 assets); document served directly from origin. Cache-Control disables caching (no-store). 1 location above the 500ms target.

Spain - Madrid
Full audit
144ms
DNS 40ms · TLS 28ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
151ms
DNS 111ms · TLS 13ms
United Stated - New York
291ms
DNS 30ms · TLS 86ms
United States - Santa Clara
462ms
DNS 15ms · TLS 148ms
Singapore - Singapore
495ms
DNS 14ms · TLS 160ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
647ms
DNS 21ms · TLS 208ms
CDN: Cloudflare (assets only) · Avg TTFB: 365ms · Cache: no-store

Audit overview

All categories sit comfortably above the 70 threshold; this is a clean audit.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

3

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

2

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Your mail setup has problems.

pricemysite.com fails 1 mail check: DMARC policy is none — monitoring only. This is the kind of misconfiguration that sends your mail to spam.

Get a full deliverability audit — €179, 48h →

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

HSTS header is missing

Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.

Security › Security Headers
Warning: 3

2 link(s) open in a new tab without rel=noopener

target="_blank" without rel="noopener" lets the destination tab navigate the original via window.opener -- a reverse-tabnabbing phishing primitive.

Security › Cross-Origin Tab Safety
Warning: 4

20 third-party resources (53% of weight)

Informational: third-party resource count and their share of page weight. High share caps perf gains from frontend optimization.

Performance › Page Weight Inventory
Warning: 5

5 render-blocking <script src> tag(s) without async/defer

Performance issues directly impact user engagement and conversion rates.

Performance › JavaScript Blocking
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Your LCP of 2.6s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 2 performance issues below directly contribute to it. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
3 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
Your LCP is 2.6s — fixing the 2 performance criticals could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

£413 investment → £4,248/month returns + GBP 50,000 risk avoided

Investment
£413
5.5 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
£4,248
£50,981/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+12259% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided GBP 50,000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
£2630.1 mo payback · +19321% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
£38 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

7 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~20%.

Barriers
7
7 warn
Bounce delta
+20pp
added vs baseline
Score
79
B
Speed
1
Trust
2
Usability
0
Content
3
Nav
1
  • Page loads in 2.6s
    Every additional 100ms above 2.5s costs conversions — you're 80ms over
    → Target <2.5s LCP: defer non-critical scripts and optimize the hero image
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • No Open Graph tags
    Links shared on LinkedIn / Slack / Facebook show bare URLs — referral clicks drop
    → Add og:title, og:description, og:image, og:url to the page head
  • No structured data
    No rich-result eligibility in Google — lower SERP CTR vs competitors with stars and prices
    → Add JSON-LD for your page type (Product, Article, FAQPage, LocalBusiness, …)

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

£413 5.5 developer hours at £75/hr
Quick wins
£38 2 fixes in ~30 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

£ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

£4,131 / month at risk ~£49,578 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

£50,000

Equality Act 2010
  • Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)
    Equality Act 2010: GBP 500 – GBP 50,000
  • Heading level skipped: H1 → H3 (missing H2)
    Equality Act 2010: GBP 500 – GBP 50,000

Bounce-Rate Cost

£4,131 /mo

+19.7pp bounce · ~1,967 lost visitors/mo

CPC: GBP 2.10

Bandwidth Waste

£0.06 /mo

988.3 MB/mo × 0.063 GBP/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~99 KB per page load
    Saves £0.06/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 2 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

96
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
91
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.88 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

2.58 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.003

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

1.88 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

2.58 s

Desktop

98
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
91
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

640 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

1.14 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.007

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

640 ms

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

1.14 s

Categories

8
Avg score 83.2

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Bootstrap · 1044 peers
You 84
·
Avg 75
+9 above average
0 50 100
Accessibility P97Performance P95Sustainability P94Compliance P12SEO P15Security P85Content P29Infrastructure P33

Top 10% of Bootstrap sites score 85+ on Compliance; you're at 70 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 95% of Bootstrap sites See full Bootstrap benchmark →
HTTP/3 · 2046 peers
You 84
·
Avg 78
+6 above average
0 50 100
Infrastructure P16Accessibility P83Compliance P19Performance P81Sustainability P78Content P32Security P66SEO P36

Top 10% of HTTP/3 sites score 95+ on Infrastructure; you're at 85 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 77% of HTTP/3 sites See full HTTP/3 benchmark →

Technology stack

Bootstrap 4.6.0, on LiteSpeed/PHP

6 technologies detected 3 stack layers 4 with CPE identifier Complex

Stack Architecture

Framework
Bootstrap 4.6.0 HTTP/3 Tailwind CSS jQuery 3.6.0
Runtime
PHP
Server
LiteSpeed

All Detected Technologies (6)

LiteSpeed is a high-scalability web server.

Categories Web servers Website https://litespeedtech.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header: LiteSpeed
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

PHP is a general-purpose scripting language used for web development.

Categories Programming languages Website https://php.net Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Bootstrap is a free and open-source CSS framework directed at responsive, mobile-first front-end web development. It contains CSS and JavaScript-based design templates for typography, forms, buttons, navigation, and other interface components.

Categories UI frameworks Website https://getbootstrap.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL: https://pricemysite.com/js/bootstrap.bundle.min.js
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

HTTP/3 is the third major version of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol used to exchange information on the World Wide Web.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://httpwg.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Framework Website https://tailwindcss.com Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence Found 7 unique Tailwind utility classes in HTML

jQuery is a JavaScript library which is a free, open-source software designed to simplify HTML DOM tree traversal and manipulation, as well as event handling, CSS animation, and Ajax.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://jquery.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL: https://pricemysite.com/js/jquery.min.js
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Observations (2)

No build tool detected

A framework (Bootstrap) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Bootstrap version may be outdated

Detected Bootstrap 4.6.0. The current major version is 5. Consider updating for security patches and new features.

→ Security

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpricemysite.com)](https://beavercheck.com/sites/pricemysite.com)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/pricemysite.com"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpricemysite.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpricemysite.com

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 6h total → projected A (90)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+4

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

3 findings 0h → B (88)
  • · HSTS header is missing
  • · 20 third-party resources (53% of weight)
  • · 2 link(s) open in a new tab without rel=noopener

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+2

Medium effort, high structural impact

2 findings 5h → A (90)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · 5 render-blocking <script src> tag(s) without async/defer

Send Feedback