Skip to content
Recent Trends
Performance stable →
60
TTFB stable →
147ms
FCP stable →
1.5s
LCP stable →
16.2s
Scanned
2026-10-06 11:41 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
58.00s
Vs prev
—

Global Performance

6/6 locations ✓

Acceptable global latency — average 456ms across 6 locations, fastest from New York (309ms), slowest from Santa Clara (577ms). No CDN (document or assets). Cache-Control header is missing. 2 locations above the 500ms target.

Spain - Madrid
Full audit
449ms
DNS 29ms · TLS 0ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
374ms
DNS 18ms · TLS 0ms
United States - Santa Clara
577ms
DNS 7ms · TLS 0ms
United Stated - New York
309ms
DNS 16ms · TLS 0ms
Singapore - Singapore
532ms
DNS 6ms · TLS 0ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
493ms
DNS 5ms · TLS 0ms
CDN: No CDN (document or assets) · Avg TTFB: 456ms · Cache: No cache headers

Audit overview

4 categories need attention: Accessibility, and 3 others.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

4

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

1

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Your mail setup has problems.

wonk.sytes.net fails 2 mail checks: No DMARC record found, No SPF record found. This is the kind of misconfiguration that sends your mail to spam.

Get a full deliverability audit — €179, 48h →

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Connection is not encrypted (plain HTTP)

Plain-HTTP sites leak everything — credentials, session cookies, browsing history — to anyone on the network path.

Security › TLS & Certificates
Critical: 2

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 3

HSTS header is missing

Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 4

Page weighs 10.6 MB (10.2 MB transferred)

Informational: total page weight (uncompressed) and bytes actually transferred over the wire.

Performance › Page Weight Budget
Critical: 5

48 link(s) with no accessible text

Links with no accessible text (empty <a></a>, image-only no alt, icon-only no aria-label) are unidentifiable to screen readers.

Accessibility › Link & Button Quality
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Your LCP of 13.6s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 1 performance issue below directly contributes to it. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
3 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
Your LCP is 13.6s — fixing the 1 performance critical could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.
1 accessibility issue excludes users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

€380 investment → €10,867/month returns + EUR 120,500,000 risk avoided

Investment
€380
4.8 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
€10.867
€130.400/yr
Payback
0.0 mo
+34216% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided EUR 120.500.000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
€340 → 0.0 mo payback · +38253% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
€140 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

11 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~44%.

Barriers
11
4 crit 7 warn
Bounce delta
+44pp
added vs baseline
Score
39
F
Speed
1
Trust
3
Usability
2
Content
3
Nav
2
  • Page takes 13.6s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 11.1s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • Site is not served over HTTPS
    Browsers show "Not Secure" in the URL bar — visitors abandon before reading
    → Install a TLS certificate (Let's Encrypt is free) and redirect HTTP → HTTPS
  • Severe layout shift during page load
    Users mis-click when content jumps — converting intent into frustration
    → Reserve space for images, ads, and embeds with explicit width/height
  • No viewport meta tag
    Mobile browsers render at desktop width and shrink — text unreadable, tap targets miniature
    → Add <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1">
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

€380 4.8 developer hours at €80/hr
Quick wins
€140 3 fixes in ~105 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

€ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

€9.655 / month at risk ~€115.864 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

€120.500.000

ePrivacy DirectiveGDPREAA
  • No privacy policy found (page links and common paths checked)
    GDPR: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000
  • Trackers detected but no cookie policy found
    GDPR: EUR 5.000 – EUR 10.000.000
  • Trackers detected but no cookie policy found
    GDPR: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000

Bounce-Rate Cost

€9.653 /mo

+43.9pp bounce · ~4,388 lost visitors/mo

CPC: EUR 2.20

Bandwidth Waste

€2,39 /mo

32223.3 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~3.2 MB per page load
    Saves €2,39/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

51
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
69
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
67
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
82
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.63 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

13.57 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

159 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.346

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

5.64 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

13.57 s

Desktop

82
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
69
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
70
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
82
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

593 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

1.14 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.217

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

2.28 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

1.14 s

Categories

8
Avg score 73.4

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Ubuntu · 87 peers
You 76
·
Avg 75
At average
0 50 100
Better than 52% of Ubuntu sites See full Ubuntu benchmark →
Apache · 536 peers
You 76
·
Avg 74
At average
0 50 100
Compliance P2Content P23Security P75Sustainability P26Accessibility P72SEO P29Performance P67Infrastructure P48

Top 10% of Apache sites score 84+ on Compliance; you're at 59 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 64% of Apache sites See full Apache benchmark →

Technology stack

Ubuntu, on Apache, hosted on Apache HTTP Server

5 technologies detected 4 stack layers 2 with CPE identifier Standard

Stack Architecture

Analytics
Google Analytics Google Tag Manager
Framework
Ubuntu
Server
Apache 2.4.18
Hosting
Apache HTTP Server 2.4.18

All Detected Technologies (5)

Categories Server Website https://httpd.apache.org Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header: Apache/2.4.18 (Ubuntu)

Apache is a free and open-source cross-platform web server software.

Categories Web servers Website https://httpd.apache.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Ubuntu is a free and open-source operating system on Linux for the enterprise server, desktop, cloud, and IoT.

Categories Operating systems Website https://www.ubuntu.com/server Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Google Analytics is a free web analytics service that tracks and reports website traffic.

Categories Analytics Website https://google.com/analytics Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Tag Manager is a tag management system (TMS) that allows you to quickly and easily update measurement codes and related code fragments collectively known as tags on your website or mobile app.

Categories Tag managers Website https://www.google.com/tagmanager Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL contains www.googletagmanager.com: https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-GSWFZK5K4X

Observations (2)

Server version exposed in headers

The Server header reveals 'Apache 2.4.18'. Exposing exact server versions helps attackers target known vulnerabilities. Consider configuring your server to hide version information.

→ Security

No build tool detected

A framework (Ubuntu) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwonk.sytes.net%2F76s%2Fpratka%2Findex.html)](https://beavercheck.com/sites/wonk.sytes.net)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/wonk.sytes.net"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwonk.sytes.net%2F76s%2Fpratka%2Findex.html" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwonk.sytes.net%2F76s%2Fpratka%2Findex.html

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 5h total → projected B (86)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+9

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

4 findings 2h → B (85)
  • · Page weighs 10.6 MB (10.2 MB transferred)
  • · HSTS header is missing
  • · 48 link(s) with no accessible text
  • · Connection is not encrypted (plain HTTP)

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+1

Medium effort, high structural impact

1 findings 3h → B (86)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Send Feedback