Skip to content
Scanned
2026-04-22 21:09 UTC
Worker
🇺🇸 New York
Duration
1.1m
Vs prev

Audit overview

6 categories need attention: Performance, and 5 others.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

2

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

3

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 3

Page weighs 13.4 MB (6.8 MB transferred)

Informational: total page weight (uncompressed) and bytes actually transferred over the wire.

Performance › Page Weight Budget
Warning: 4

189 third-party resources (100% of weight)

Informational: third-party resource count and their share of page weight. High share caps perf gains from frontend optimization.

Performance › Page Weight Inventory
Warning: 5

190 HTTP requests — consider bundling or reducing

High HTTP request count — bundling, sprite-ing, and HTTP/2 server push can reduce per-request overhead.

Performance › Page Weight Budget
What fixing these means. Your site has several issues that may be affecting user experience and business outcomes. Your LCP of 21.5s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 3 performance issues below directly contribute to it. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
2 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
Your LCP is 21.5s — fixing the 3 performance criticals could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

€550 investment → €7,340/month returns + EUR 500,000 risk avoided

Investment
€550
10.0 h · 3 findings
Monthly returns
€7.340
€88.080/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+15915% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided EUR 500.000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
€5500.1 mo payback · +15915% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

9 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~33%.

Barriers
9
3 crit 6 warn
Bounce delta
+33pp
added vs baseline
Score
52
D
Speed
2
Trust
2
Usability
1
Content
3
Nav
1
  • Page takes 21.5s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 19.0s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • Page feels frozen for 2.7s
    Clicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs
    → Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
  • Severe layout shift during page load
    Users mis-click when content jumps — converting intent into frustration
    → Reserve space for images, ads, and embeds with explicit width/height
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

€550 10.0 developer hours at €55/hr

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

/hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

€7.340 / month at risk ~€88.080 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

€500.000

EAA
  • No <nav> landmark found
    EAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000
  • Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)
    EAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000

Bounce-Rate Cost

€7.338 /mo

+33.4pp bounce · ~3,336 lost visitors/mo

CPC: EUR 2.20

Bandwidth Waste

€1,59 /mo

21512.1 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~2.2 MB per page load
    Saves €1,59/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 3 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

16
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
93
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
81
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

4.79 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

21.49 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

2.72 s

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.350

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

4.84 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

29.06 s

Desktop

37
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
97
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
81
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.22 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

6.24 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

232 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.377

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

4.58 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

6.34 s

Categories

8
Avg score 70.8

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

AngularJS · 454 peers
You 69
·
Avg 74
At average
0 50 100
SEO P1Performance P3Content P4Infrastructure P12Sustainability P12Security P32Compliance P35Accessibility P58

Top 10% of AngularJS sites score 81+ on SEO; you're at 69 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 5% of AngularJS sites See full AngularJS benchmark →
Apple · 1279 peers
You 69
·
Avg 73
At average
0 50 100
SEO P1Performance P8Content P8Infrastructure P26Security P36Accessibility P60Compliance P59Sustainability P42

Top 10% of Apple sites score 95+ on SEO; you're at 69 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 7% of Apple sites See full Apple benchmark →

Technology stack

AngularJS, hosted on Google Cloud, with Cloudflare CDN

12 technologies detected 3 stack layers 2 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Framework
AngularJS Apple Cloudflare Turnstile Facebook Google Search Console Google Workspace HSTS HTTP/3 Microsoft
CDN
Cloudflare Google Cloud CDN
Hosting
Google Cloud

All Detected Technologies (12)

Categories CDN Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header in redirect: cloudflare

Cloud CDN uses Google's global edge network to serve content closer to users.

Categories CDN Website https://cloud.google.com/cdn Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence via: 1.1 google

Google Cloud is a suite of cloud computing services.

Categories IaaS Website https://cloud.google.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Via header contains google
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

AngularJS is a JavaScript-based open-source web application framework led by the Angular Team at Google.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://angularjs.org Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Low Evidence TXT record: apple-domain-verification=PFveFCetoRJyrpN4

Turnstile is Cloudflare's smart CAPTCHA alternative.

Categories Security Website https://www.cloudflare.com/products/turnstile Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL contains challenges.cloudflare.com: https://challenges.cloudflare.com/turnstile/v0/b/0b8fb825cb67/api.js?onload=cFRiY3&render=explicit
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: facebook-domain-verification=g1lc5kyqo2hane7oiuxpvsmk3md5kb
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=kgsCog5ACwbdbHmEZzsbw8ELk06sxYmcgr_XPCInTn4
Categories Email Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence MX record: ASPMX.L.GOOGLE.COM

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

HTTP/3 is the third major version of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol used to exchange information on the World Wide Web.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://httpwg.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Low Evidence TXT record: MS=ms16812314

Observations (2)

No build tool detected

A framework (AngularJS) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

12 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fupf.edu)](https://beavercheck.com/results/9b257656-fb37-46e6-b7a8-69764b30ab00)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/9b257656-fb37-46e6-b7a8-69764b30ab00"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fupf.edu" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fupf.edu

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 10h total → projected C (78)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+4

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

2 findings 0h → C (73)
  • · Page weighs 13.4 MB (6.8 MB transferred)
  • · 189 third-party resources (100% of weight)

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+5

Medium effort, high structural impact

3 findings 10h → C (78)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found
  • · 190 HTTP requests — consider bundling or reducing

Send Feedback