Skip to content
EU · EUR (€) · Estimated Applicable regulations: GDPR · ePrivacy Directive · EAA Dev cost: €85/hr How jurisdiction is detected
Scanned
2026-11-02 15:16 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
47.00s
Vs prev
—

Audit overview

All categories sit comfortably above the 70 threshold; this is a clean audit.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

1

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

4

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

'unsafe-eval' found in script source

Unsafe value (unsafe-inline, unsafe-eval) in script-src defeats CSP's main protection — XSS injections can execute again.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 2

'unsafe-inline' found in script source

Unsafe value (unsafe-inline, unsafe-eval) in script-src defeats CSP's main protection — XSS injections can execute again.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 3

Scan returned a Cloudflare bot-protection interstitial, not the actual page

Security gaps expose your site and users to attacks, eroding trust.

Security › Bot Challenge Detection
Warning: 4

is missing width/height — may cause layout shift

Performance issues directly impact user engagement and conversion rates.

Performance › Image Optimization
Warning: 5

1 render-blocking <script src> tag(s) without async/defer

Performance issues directly impact user engagement and conversion rates.

Performance › JavaScript Blocking
What fixing these means. Your site is in great shape. The remaining improvements are refinements rather than critical fixes. Your server takes 1301ms to respond — every other performance metric inherits that delay. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
3 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
2 performance issues — Akamai's research found 53% of mobile users abandon pages over 3s.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

€1,403 investment → €2,575/month returns + EUR 500,000 risk avoided

Investment
€1.403
16.5 h · 5 findings
Monthly returns
€2.575
€30.898/yr
Payback
0.5 mo
+2103% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided EUR 500.000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
€1.063 → 0.4 mo payback · +2808% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
€43 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

4 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~12%.

Barriers
4
4 warn
Bounce delta
+12pp
added vs baseline
Score
88
A
Speed
0
Trust
0
Usability
0
Content
3
Nav
1
  • No Open Graph tags
    Links shared on LinkedIn / Slack / Facebook show bare URLs — referral clicks drop
    → Add og:title, og:description, og:image, og:url to the page head
  • No structured data
    No rich-result eligibility in Google — lower SERP CTR vs competitors with stars and prices
    → Add JSON-LD for your page type (Product, Article, FAQPage, LocalBusiness, …)
  • Thin content
    Under 300 words — visitors bounce looking for substance, search engines rank competitors first
    → Add a substantive FAQ, product detail, or case-study section
  • No skip-to-content link
    Keyboard and screen-reader users must tab through the entire header on every page
    → Add a visible-on-focus <a href="#main">Skip to content</a> as the first focusable element

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

€1,403 16.5 developer hours at €85/hr
Quick wins
€43 1 fixes in ~30 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

€ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

€2.575 / month at risk ~€30.898 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

€500.000

EAA
  • No <nav> landmark found
    EAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000
  • Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)
    EAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000

Bounce-Rate Cost

€2.575 /mo

+11.7pp bounce · ~1,170 lost visitors/mo

CPC: EUR 2.20

Bandwidth Waste

€0,03 /mo

364.7 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~36 KB per page load
    Saves €0,03/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 3 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

96
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
87
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
77
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

2.14 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

2.14 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

2.81 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

2.14 s

Desktop

100
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
87
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
77
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

559 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

559 ms

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

559 ms

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

559 ms

Categories

8
Avg score 82.9

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

WordPress · 1184 peers
You 85
·
Avg 77
+8 above average
0 50 100
Performance P96SEO P6Security P91Accessibility P88Content P15Compliance P21Sustainability P71Infrastructure P67

Top 10% of WordPress sites score 97+ on SEO; you're at 85 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 91% of WordPress sites See full WordPress benchmark →
AngularJS · 505 peers
You 85
·
Avg 75
+10 above average
0 50 100
Performance P95Compliance P8Accessibility P90SEO P87Security P84Content P81Infrastructure P61Sustainability P51

Top 10% of AngularJS sites score 82+ on Compliance; you're at 70 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 96% of AngularJS sites See full AngularJS benchmark →

Technology stack

WordPress, on PHP, with Cloudflare CDN

9 technologies detected 4 stack layers 5 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

CMS
WordPress
Framework
AngularJS Cloudflare Turnstile Google Search Console HSTS HTTP/3 MySQL
Runtime
PHP
CDN
Cloudflare

All Detected Technologies (9)

Cloudflare is a web-infrastructure and website-security company, providing content-delivery-network services, DDoS mitigation, Internet security, and distributed domain-name-server services.

Categories CDN Website https://www.cloudflare.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header in redirect: cloudflare
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

PHP is a general-purpose scripting language used for web development.

Categories Programming languages Website https://php.net Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

WordPress is a free and open-source content management system written in PHP and paired with a MySQL or MariaDB database. Features include a plugin architecture and a template system.

Categories CMS, Blogs Website https://wordpress.org Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Header link contains wp-json
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

AngularJS is a JavaScript-based open-source web application framework led by the Angular Team at Google.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://angularjs.org Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Turnstile is Cloudflare's smart CAPTCHA alternative.

Categories Security Website https://www.cloudflare.com/products/turnstile Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL contains challenges.cloudflare.com: https://challenges.cloudflare.com/turnstile/v0/b/d0d7f3571048/api.js?onload=_23da6999e76815c10f52a53e&render=explicit
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=kezmxImkYXkQLQ9DN-FHW5XcAbQ91GkhVdShMQyMtnQ

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

HTTP/3 is the third major version of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol used to exchange information on the World Wide Web.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://httpwg.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck

MySQL is an open-source relational database management system.

Categories Databases Website https://mysql.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Observations (3)

WordPress detected — review security configuration

WordPress sites benefit from: protecting wp-login.php, disabling XML-RPC if unused, restricting REST API access, and keeping all plugins and themes up to date. Check the Security tab for specific findings.

→ Security

No build tool detected

A framework (AngularJS) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

9 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fluxsite.eu)](https://beavercheck.com/sites/luxsite.eu)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/luxsite.eu"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fluxsite.eu" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fluxsite.eu

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

3 sprints · 16h total → projected A (91)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+2

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

1 findings 0h → B (87)
  • · Scan returned a Cloudflare bot-protection interstitial, not the actual page

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+2

Medium effort, high structural impact

2 findings 4h → B (89)
  • · is missing width/height — may cause layout shift
  • · 1 render-blocking <script src> tag(s) without async/defer

Sprint 3: Strategic Improvements

+2

Higher effort, long-term payoff

2 findings 12h → A (91)
  • · 'unsafe-eval' found in script source
  • · 'unsafe-inline' found in script source

Send Feedback