Skip to content
Scanned
2026-09-25 18:16 UTC
Worker
🇺🇸 New York
Duration
1.3m
Vs prev
—

Global Performance

6/6 locations ✓

High global latency — average 1335ms across 6 locations, fastest from New York (254ms), slowest from Singapore (4285ms). Assets on AWS CloudFront (host ctf-images.gammacdn.com, 21 assets); document served directly from origin. Cache-Control header is missing. 5 locations above the 500ms target.

United Stated - New York
Full audit
254ms
DNS 200ms · TLS 24ms
United States - Santa Clara
638ms
DNS 459ms · TLS 66ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
1140ms
DNS 721ms · TLS 145ms
Spain - Madrid
702ms
DNS 337ms · TLS 126ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
988ms
DNS 689ms · TLS 107ms
Singapore - Singapore
4285ms
DNS 3607ms · TLS 232ms
CDN: AWS CloudFront (assets only) · Avg TTFB: 1335ms · Cache: No cache headers

Audit overview

Content needs attention; the rest of the categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

4

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

1

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Your mail setup has problems.

bigrocco.com fails 1 mail check: No DMARC record found. This is the kind of misconfiguration that sends your mail to spam.

Get a full deliverability audit — €179, 48h →

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

HSTS header is missing

Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 3

No <main> landmark found

Without a <main> landmark, screen-reader users can't skip past the navigation to the page content — every page starts with re-reading the menu.

Accessibility › Landmark Structure
Critical: 4

Soft 404: server returns HTTP 200 for non-existent pages

Soft 404s (HTTP 200 for missing pages) confuse Google — it indexes the 'not found' page as real content and ranks it.

Accessibility › 404 Error Page
Warning: 5

1 publicly-accessible JavaScript source map(s)

Source maps reveal original source code (variable names, comments, file structure) and are shipped to production by mistake almost universally. The standard fix is a one-line build-tool config change.

Security › Source Map Exposure
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
3 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
2 accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

$442 investment → $9,444/month returns + USD 150,000 risk avoided

Investment
$442
4.4 h · 5 findings
Monthly returns
$9,444
$113,332/yr
Payback
0.0 mo
+25560% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided USD 150,000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
$342 → 0.0 mo payback · +33070% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
$142 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

10 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~35%.

Barriers
10
3 crit 7 warn
Bounce delta
+35pp
added vs baseline
Score
49
D
Speed
2
Trust
2
Usability
1
Content
3
Nav
2
  • Page takes 16.5s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 14.0s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • Page feels frozen for 2.6s
    Clicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs
    → Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
  • Severe layout shift during page load
    Users mis-click when content jumps — converting intent into frustration
    → Reserve space for images, ads, and embeds with explicit width/height
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

$442 4.4 developer hours at $100/hr
Quick wins
$142 4 fixes in ~85 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

$ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

$9,444 / month at risk ~$113,332 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

$150,000

ADA Title III
  • No <main> landmark found
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
  • Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
  • 2 empty heading(s)
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000

Bounce-Rate Cost

$9,444 /mo

+35.1pp bounce · ~3,511 lost visitors/mo

CPC: USD 2.69

Bandwidth Waste

$0.59 /mo

7405.0 MB/mo × 0.080 USD/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~740 KB per page load
    Saves $0.59/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 4 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

9
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
88
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
50
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

4.79 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

16.52 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

2.60 s

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

2.777

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

4.79 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

16.52 s

Desktop

36
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
88
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
50
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.39 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

3.40 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

351 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.906

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

1.54 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

3.40 s

Categories

8
Avg score 77.0

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Algolia · 50 peers
You 78
·
Avg 75
At average
0 50 100
Better than 72% of Algolia sites See full Algolia benchmark →
Algolia DocSearch · 19 peers
You 78
·
Avg 76
At average
0 50 100
Better than 73% of Algolia DocSearch sites See full Algolia DocSearch benchmark →

Technology stack

Algolia 3.35.1, on Apache/styled-components, hosted on Apache HTTP Server, wi...

11 technologies detected 6 stack layers 2 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Build
Webpack
Framework
Algolia 3.35.1 Algolia DocSearch Cloudflare Rocket Loader React React Router 6 core-js 3.49.0
Runtime
styled-components 5.3.11
Server
Apache
CDN
Cloudflare
Hosting
Apache HTTP Server 2

All Detected Technologies (11)

Categories CDN Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header in redirect: cloudflare
Categories Server Website https://httpd.apache.org Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header: Apache/2

Apache is a free and open-source cross-platform web server software.

Categories Web servers Website https://httpd.apache.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Styled components is a CSS-in-JS styling framework that uses tagged template literals in JavaScript.

Categories JavaScript frameworks, Development Website https://styled-components.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Algolia offers a hosted web search product delivering real-time results.

Categories Search engines Website https://www.algolia.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Algolia DocSearch is a search widget specifically designed for documentation websites.

Categories Widgets Website https://docsearch.algolia.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Cloudflare Rocket Loader is responsible for prioritising over website's content by delaying the loading of Javascript until rendering.

React is an open-source JavaScript library for building user interfaces or UI components.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://reactjs.org Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

React Router provides declarative routing for React.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://reactrouter.com Detected by BeaverCheck

core-js is a modular standard library for JavaScript, with polyfills for cutting-edge ECMAScript features.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://github.com/zloirock/core-js Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Build Tool Website https://webpack.js.org Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence Chunk pattern: https://bigrocco.com/static/js/main.516bd22c.js

Observations (2)

Runtime exposed via X-Powered-By header

The X-Powered-By header reveals 'styled-components 5.3.11'. Remove this header in production to reduce information leakage.

→ Security

Complex technology stack detected

11 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbigrocco.com)](https://beavercheck.com/sites/bigrocco.com)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/bigrocco.com"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbigrocco.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbigrocco.com

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 4h total → projected B (86)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+7

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

4 findings 1h → B (85)
  • · No <main> landmark found
  • · HSTS header is missing
  • · Soft 404: server returns HTTP 200 for non-existent pages
  • · 1 publicly-accessible JavaScript source map(s)

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+1

Medium effort, high structural impact

1 findings 3h → B (86)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Send Feedback