Skip to content
Scanned
2026-05-10 13:25 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
44.00s
Vs prev

Global Performance

6/6 locations

Excellent global latency — average 19ms across 6 locations, fastest from Amsterdam (9ms), slowest from Madrid (41ms). Fastly edge cache (HIT). Cache-Control header is missing.

Spain - Madrid
Full audit
41ms
DNS 38ms · TLS 2ms
United Stated - New York
11ms
DNS 3ms · TLS 4ms
Singapore - Singapore
14ms
DNS 8ms · TLS 4ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
24ms
DNS 13ms · TLS 7ms
United States - Santa Clara
16ms
DNS 6ms · TLS 6ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
9ms
DNS 3ms · TLS 4ms
CDN: Fastly (HIT) · Avg TTFB: 19ms · Cache: No cache headers

Audit overview

Compliance needs attention; the rest of the categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

2

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

3

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 3

No favicon or icon links detected

Without a favicon, your tab shows a blank icon and bookmarks look unbranded — amateur signal in every browser surface.

Accessibility › Favicon & Branding
Warning: 4

1 link(s) open in a new tab without rel=noopener

target="_blank" without rel="noopener" lets the destination tab navigate the original via window.opener -- a reverse-tabnabbing phishing primitive.

Security › Cross-Origin Tab Safety
Warning: 5

15 risky subdomain name(s) advertised in certificate SANs

Internal/staging/admin subdomain names visible via Certificate Transparency -- attackers can enumerate them in seconds via crt.sh.

Security › Subdomain Inventory Exposure
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
4 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
1 accessibility issue excludes users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

$875 investment → $11,395/month returns + USD 157,500 risk avoided

Investment
$875
8.8 h · 5 findings
Monthly returns
$11,395
$136,737/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+15527% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided USD 157,500
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
$6500.1 mo payback · +20936% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
$75 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

7 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~27%.

Barriers
7
1 crit 6 warn
Bounce delta
+27pp
added vs baseline
Score
72
B
Speed
2
Trust
1
Usability
0
Content
3
Nav
1
  • Page takes 5.9s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 3.4s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • High main-thread blocking time
    Page is non-interactive for 536ms after first paint
    → Defer third-party scripts and split large bundles
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • No Open Graph tags
    Links shared on LinkedIn / Slack / Facebook show bare URLs — referral clicks drop
    → Add og:title, og:description, og:image, og:url to the page head
  • No structured data
    No rich-result eligibility in Google — lower SERP CTR vs competitors with stars and prices
    → Add JSON-LD for your page type (Product, Article, FAQPage, LocalBusiness, …)

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

$875 8.8 developer hours at $100/hr
Quick wins
$75 2 fixes in ~45 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

$ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Cost of inaction

$20,327 / month at risk ~$243,924 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

$157,500

ADA Title IIICCPA/CPRA
  • No privacy policy link detected
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • Trackers detected but no cookie policy found
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • Trackers detected but no privacy policy found
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • Privacy Policy not detected
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • No <nav> landmark found
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
  • Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000

Bounce-Rate Cost

$7,202 /mo

+26.8pp bounce · ~2,677 lost visitors/mo

CPC: USD 2.69

Bandwidth Waste

$0.32 /mo

4061.4 MB/mo × 0.080 USD/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~406 KB per page load
    Saves $0.32/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 3 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

51
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
95
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

5.41 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

5.86 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

536 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.024

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

5.41 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

9.25 s

Desktop

89
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
100
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.38 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

1.61 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

16 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.003

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

1.38 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

2.05 s

Categories

8
Avg score 79.9

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Google Search Console · 3769 peers
You 82
·
Avg 73
+9 above average
0 50 100
Compliance P1Security P97Accessibility P95Sustainability P83Performance P82SEO P30Content P32Infrastructure P44

Top 10% of Google Search Console sites score 85+ on Compliance; you're at 63 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 95% of Google Search Console sites See full Google Search Console benchmark →
HSTS · 2429 peers
You 82
·
Avg 75
+7 above average
0 50 100
Compliance P3Security P94Accessibility P92Sustainability P80Performance P77SEO P27Content P29Infrastructure P38

Top 10% of HSTS sites score 86+ on Compliance; you're at 63 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 91% of HSTS sites See full HSTS benchmark →

Technology stack

Google Search Console, with Fastly CDN

5 technologies detected 2 stack layers 1 with CPE identifier Standard

Stack Architecture

Framework
Google Search Console HSTS Proofpoint Varnish
CDN
Fastly

All Detected Technologies (5)

Categories CDN Website https://www.fastly.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence x-served-by: cache-toj-leto2350072-TOJ
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=c0froR8Rd3ORHU87Cz8PFBS2wY5M1_Ihd0qWdnhAVl4

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Email Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence MX record: mxa-001c4901.gslb.pphosted.com

Varnish is a reverse caching proxy.

Categories Caching Website https://www.varnish-cache.org Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Observations (1)

No build tool detected

A framework (Google Search Console) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2FZazzle.com)](https://beavercheck.com/results/9f63fe9b-2451-4782-bcb6-08c828a8b548)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/9f63fe9b-2451-4782-bcb6-08c828a8b548"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2FZazzle.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2FZazzle.com

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 9h total → projected B (87)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+2

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

2 findings 1h → B (84)
  • · No favicon or icon links detected
  • · 1 link(s) open in a new tab without rel=noopener

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+3

Medium effort, high structural impact

3 findings 8h → B (87)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found
  • · 15 risky subdomain name(s) advertised in certificate SANs

Send Feedback