Skip to content
Scanned
2026-04-21 22:50 UTC
Worker
🇳🇱 Amsterdam
Duration
2.3m
Vs prev

Audit overview

3 categories need attention: Security, and 2 others.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

3

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

2

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

HSTS header is missing

Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 3

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 4

1 button(s) with no accessible text

Buttons with no accessible text (icon-only, no aria-label) can't be activated by voice control or understood by screen readers.

Accessibility › Link & Button Quality
Critical: 5

6 image-in-link without alt text

Image-only links with no alt create empty links — screen-reader users hear 'link' with no destination context.

Accessibility › Alt Text Quality
What fixing these means. Your site has several issues that may be affecting user experience and business outcomes. Accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology — an estimated 15% of your potential audience. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
3 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
2 accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

¥2,538 investment → ¥58,875/month returns + CNY 50,000,000 risk avoided

Investment
¥2,538
7.3 h · 5 findings
Monthly returns
¥58,875
¥706,502/yr
Payback
0.0 mo
+27742% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided CNY 50,000,000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
¥2,1880.0 mo payback · +32197% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
¥438 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

12 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~37%.

Barriers
12
4 crit 8 warn
Bounce delta
+37pp
added vs baseline
Score
36
F
Speed
2
Trust
2
Usability
2
Content
3
Nav
3
  • Page takes 9.7s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 7.2s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • Page feels frozen for 1.7s
    Clicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs
    → Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
  • Severe layout shift during page load
    Users mis-click when content jumps — converting intent into frustration
    → Reserve space for images, ads, and embeds with explicit width/height
  • 44 broken link(s) on the page
    Clicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends
    → Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

¥2,538 7.3 developer hours at ¥350/hr
Quick wins
¥438 3 fixes in ~75 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

¥ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

¥37,256 / month at risk ~¥447,071 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

¥50,000,000

PIPL
  • No privacy policy link detected
    PIPL: CNY 100,000 – CNY 50,000,000
  • Trackers detected but no cookie policy found
    PIPL: CNY 100,000 – CNY 50,000,000
  • Trackers detected but no privacy policy found
    PIPL: CNY 100,000 – CNY 50,000,000

Bounce-Rate Cost

¥37,252 /mo

+37.3pp bounce · ~3,725 lost visitors/mo

CPC: CNY 10.00

Bandwidth Waste

¥3.70 /mo

6474.8 MB/mo × 0.571 CNY/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~647 KB per page load
    Saves ¥3.70/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

9
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
64
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
73
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

4.10 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

9.73 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

1.69 s

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.578

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

13.08 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

16.87 s

Desktop

80
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
63
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
77
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
83
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.70 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

1.97 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

32 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.032

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

2.51 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

2.28 s

Categories

8
Avg score 67.2

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Babel · 102 peers
You 66
·
Avg 71
At average
0 50 100
Better than 7% of Babel sites See full Babel benchmark →
Bootstrap · 885 peers
You 66
·
Avg 74
-8 below average
0 50 100
Content P1Security P2SEO P3Accessibility P4Compliance P16Infrastructure P21Performance P34Sustainability P41

Top 10% of Bootstrap sites score 95+ on Content; you're at 56 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Technology stack

Babel, on OpenResty/Ruby, with Nginx CDN

17 technologies detected 5 stack layers 8 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Analytics
Baidu Analytics (百度统计) CNZZ Sensors Data
Framework
Babel Bootstrap 3.3.6Google Search Console Microsoft Moment.js 2.12.0 Ruby on Rails Sentry Vue.js 2.4.2 Webpack core-js 2.6.11 jQuery 2.2.2
Runtime
Ruby
Server
OpenResty 1.21.4.1
CDN
Nginx

All Detected Technologies (17)

Nginx is a web server that can also be used as a reverse proxy, load balancer, mail proxy and HTTP cache.

Categories Web servers, Reverse proxies Website https://nginx.org/en Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

OpenResty is a web platform based on nginx which can run Lua scripts using its LuaJIT engine.

Categories Web servers Website https://openresty.org Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header: openresty/1.21.4.1
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Ruby is an open-source object-oriented programming language.

Categories Programming languages Website https://ruby-lang.org Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Babel is a free and open-source transcompiler for writing next generation JavaScript.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://babeljs.io Detected by BeaverCheck

Bootstrap is a free and open-source CSS framework directed at responsive, mobile-first front-end web development. It contains CSS and JavaScript-based design templates for typography, forms, buttons, navigation, and other interface components.

Categories UI frameworks Website https://getbootstrap.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=6ARJIxhZLIgZT7J8MZkENr5mR0-CqshgzYyA3r3jBWU
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Low Evidence TXT record: MS=ms95641435

Moment.js is a free and open-source JavaScript library that removes the need to use the native JavaScript Date object directly.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://momentjs.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Ruby on Rails is a server-side web application framework written in Ruby under the MIT License.

Categories Web frameworks Website https://rubyonrails.org Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Sentry is an open-source platform for workflow productivity, aggregating errors from across the stack in real time.

Categories Issue trackers Website https://sentry.io/ Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Vue.js is an open-source model–view–viewmodel JavaScript framework for building user interfaces and single-page applications.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://vuejs.org Detected by BeaverCheck

Webpack is an open-source JavaScript module bundler.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://webpack.js.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck

core-js is a modular standard library for JavaScript, with polyfills for cutting-edge ECMAScript features.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://github.com/zloirock/core-js Detected by BeaverCheck

jQuery is a JavaScript library which is a free, open-source software designed to simplify HTML DOM tree traversal and manipulation, as well as event handling, CSS animation, and Ajax.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://jquery.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Baidu Analytics (百度统计) is a free tool for tracking and reporting traffic data of users visiting your site.

Categories Analytics Website https://tongji.baidu.com/ Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Analytics Website https://web.umeng.com/ Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Analytics Website https://www.sensorsdata.cn Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (7)

Server version exposed in headers

The Server header reveals 'OpenResty 1.21.4.1'. Exposing exact server versions helps attackers target known vulnerabilities. Consider configuring your server to hide version information.

→ Security

jQuery loaded alongside a modern framework

Both jQuery and Vue.js are loaded. Modern frameworks handle DOM manipulation natively. jQuery may be unnecessary and adds ~30KB to the page weight. Check the Performance tab for bundle analysis.

→ Performance

No build tool detected

A framework (Babel) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Bootstrap version may be outdated

Detected Bootstrap 3.3.6. The current major version is 5. Consider updating for security patches and new features.

→ Security

Vue.js version may be outdated

Detected Vue.js 2.4.2. The current major version is 3. Consider updating for security patches and new features.

→ Security

jQuery version may be outdated

Detected jQuery 2.2.2. The current major version is 3. Consider updating for security patches and new features.

→ Security

Complex technology stack detected

17 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fjianshu.com)](https://beavercheck.com/results/9f89e6a4-9095-4fb1-a485-9fd501aa8ec9)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/9f89e6a4-9095-4fb1-a485-9fd501aa8ec9"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fjianshu.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fjianshu.com

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 7h total → projected C (75)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+5

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

3 findings 1h → C (71)
  • · HSTS header is missing
  • · 1 button(s) with no accessible text
  • · 6 image-in-link without alt text

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+4

Medium effort, high structural impact

2 findings 6h → C (75)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found

Send Feedback