Skip to content
Scanned
2026-04-22 20:49 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
59.00s
Vs prev

Audit overview

5 categories need attention: Performance, and 4 others.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

3

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

2

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 3

No <main> landmark found

Without a <main> landmark, screen-reader users can't skip past the navigation to the page content — every page starts with re-reading the menu.

Accessibility › Landmark Structure
Critical: 4

No favicon or icon links detected

Without a favicon, your tab shows a blank icon and bookmarks look unbranded — amateur signal in every browser surface.

Accessibility › Favicon & Branding
Warning: 5

182 third-party resources (100% of weight)

Informational: third-party resource count and their share of page weight. High share caps perf gains from frontend optimization.

Performance › Page Weight Inventory
What fixing these means. Your site has several issues that may be affecting user experience and business outcomes. Your LCP of 17.8s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 1 performance issue below directly contributes to it. Accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology — an estimated 15% of your potential audience. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
2 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
2 accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology.
Your LCP is 17.8s — fixing the 1 performance critical could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

TWD 10,667 investment → TWD 190,400/month returns

Investment
TWD 10,667
6.7 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
TWD 190,400
TWD 2,284,806/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+21320% Y1
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
TWD 9,8670.1 mo payback · +23057% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
TWD 1,067 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

9 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~38%.

Barriers
9
3 crit 6 warn
Bounce delta
+38pp
added vs baseline
Score
52
D
Speed
2
Trust
1
Usability
1
Content
4
Nav
1
  • Page takes 17.8s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 15.3s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • Page feels frozen for 2.8s
    Clicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs
    → Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
  • No viewport meta tag
    Mobile browsers render at desktop width and shrink — text unreadable, tap targets miniature
    → Add <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1">
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • No Open Graph tags
    Links shared on LinkedIn / Slack / Facebook show bare URLs — referral clicks drop
    → Add og:title, og:description, og:image, og:url to the page head

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

NT$10,667 6.7 developer hours at NT$1600/hr
Quick wins
NT$1,067 2 fixes in ~40 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

NT$ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

TWD 190,400 / month at risk ~TWD 2,284,806 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Bounce-Rate Cost

TWD 190,372 /mo

+38.1pp bounce · ~3,807 lost visitors/mo

CPC: TWD 50.00

Bandwidth Waste

TWD 29 /mo

11093.5 MB/mo × 2.581 TWD/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~1.1 MB per page load
    Saves TWD 29/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 4 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

26
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
92
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
73
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
91
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

7.20 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

17.84 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

2.80 s

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.001

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

12.25 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

20.86 s

Desktop

49
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
93
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
73
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
91
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.58 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

4.17 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

388 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.002

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

3.35 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

4.94 s

Categories

8
Avg score 69.0

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Cloudflare · 2298 peers
You 69
·
Avg 75
-6 below average
0 50 100
Compliance P6Accessibility P8Content P8Infrastructure P11Sustainability P12Performance P16SEO P17Security P71

Top 10% of Cloudflare sites score 85+ on Compliance; you're at 66 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 3% of Cloudflare sites See full Cloudflare benchmark →
Google Search Console · 3990 peers
You 69
·
Avg 74
At average
0 50 100
Compliance P5Content P10Accessibility P11SEO P11Infrastructure P18Security P80Performance P23Sustainability P29

Top 10% of Google Search Console sites score 85+ on Compliance; you're at 66 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 7% of Google Search Console sites See full Google Search Console benchmark →

Technology stack

Cloudflare, with Nginx CDN

6 technologies detected 2 stack layers 1 with CPE identifier Complex

Stack Architecture

Framework
Cloudflare Google Search Console HSTS Microsoft Microsoft 365
CDN
Nginx

All Detected Technologies (6)

Nginx is a web server that can also be used as a reverse proxy, load balancer, mail proxy and HTTP cache.

Categories Web servers, Reverse proxies Website https://nginx.org/en Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header: nginx
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →
Categories DNS Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence NS record: ns0226.secondary.cloudflare.com
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=7MQXeVsdWG-vo41NvtF2RCG_UF7d4FsaLAECKN1O-xI

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Low Evidence TXT record: MS=ms57490047
Categories Email Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence TXT SPF record includes spf.protection.outlook.com: v=spf1 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:_spf1.gigabyte.com include:spfgw.fsi.ne.jp ip4:103.130.100.225 ip4:103.130.100.253 ip4:211.23.46.111 ip4:218.32.81.100 ip4:124.219.118.123 ip4:61.216.99.205 ip4:23.102.228.62 -all

Observations (1)

No build tool detected

A framework (Cloudflare) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgigabyte.com)](https://beavercheck.com/sites/gigabyte.com)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/gigabyte.com"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgigabyte.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgigabyte.com

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 7h total → projected C (78)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+4

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

3 findings 1h → C (73)
  • · No <main> landmark found
  • · No favicon or icon links detected
  • · 182 third-party resources (100% of weight)

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+5

Medium effort, high structural impact

2 findings 6h → C (78)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found

Send Feedback