Skip to content
DE · EUR (€) · Estimated Applicable regulations: DSGVO · ePrivacy Directive · EAA Dev cost: €90/hr How jurisdiction is detected
Scanned
2026-04-21 19:39 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
1.3m
Vs prev

Audit overview

Security and Accessibility need attention; the other categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

2

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

3

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

HSTS header is missing

Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 3

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 4

4 link(s) with no accessible text

Links with no accessible text (empty <a></a>, image-only no alt, icon-only no aria-label) are unidentifiable to screen readers.

Accessibility › Link & Button Quality
Warning: 5

is missing width/height — may cause layout shift

Performance issues directly impact user engagement and conversion rates.

Performance › Image Optimization
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Your LCP of 8.3s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 1 performance issue below directly contributes to it. The 3 security gaps leave your users exposed — modern browsers increasingly warn visitors about insecure sites. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
3 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
1 accessibility issue excludes users who rely on assistive technology.
Your LCP is 8.3s — fixing the 1 performance critical could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

€788 investment → €10,929/month returns + EUR 120,500,000 risk avoided

Investment
€788
8.8 h · 5 findings
Monthly returns
€10.929
€131.149/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+16554% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided EUR 120.500.000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
€5630.1 mo payback · +23215% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
€68 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

8 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~27%.

Barriers
8
1 crit 7 warn
Bounce delta
+27pp
added vs baseline
Score
69
C
Speed
2
Trust
2
Usability
0
Content
2
Nav
2
  • Page takes 8.3s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 5.8s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • High main-thread blocking time
    Page is non-interactive for 240ms after first paint
    → Defer third-party scripts and split large bundles
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • No structured data
    No rich-result eligibility in Google — lower SERP CTR vs competitors with stars and prices
    → Add JSON-LD for your page type (Product, Article, FAQPage, LocalBusiness, …)

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

€788 8.8 developer hours at €90/hr
Quick wins
€68 2 fixes in ~45 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

/hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

€5.833 / month at risk ~€69.997 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

€120.500.000

ePrivacy DirectiveDSGVOEAA
  • No privacy policy link detected
    DSGVO: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000
  • Trackers detected but no cookie policy found
    DSGVO: EUR 5.000 – EUR 10.000.000
  • Trackers detected but no cookie policy found
    DSGVO: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000

Bounce-Rate Cost

€5.833 /mo

+26.5pp bounce · ~2,651 lost visitors/mo

CPC: EUR 2.20

Bandwidth Waste

€0,29 /mo

3909.5 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~391 KB per page load
    Saves €0,29/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 4 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

57
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
90
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

4.27 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

8.27 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

240 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

6.15 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

8.87 s

Desktop

91
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
92
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.01 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

1.63 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.042

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

1.32 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

1.63 s

Categories

8
Avg score 78.2

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Bootstrap · 921 peers
You 75
·
Avg 74
At average
0 50 100
Security P3Infrastructure P8Accessibility P78Sustainability P74Performance P72SEO P64Compliance P38Content P49

Top 10% of Bootstrap sites score 78+ on Security; you're at 58 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 59% of Bootstrap sites See full Bootstrap benchmark →
Google Search Console · 3886 peers
You 75
·
Avg 73
At average
0 50 100
Security P1Infrastructure P6Accessibility P81Performance P77Sustainability P76SEO P75Compliance P42Content P51

Top 10% of Google Search Console sites score 79+ on Security; you're at 58 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 61% of Google Search Console sites See full Google Search Console benchmark →

Technology stack

Bootstrap 3.4.1, on Ruby, with F5 BigIP CDN

13 technologies detected 4 stack layers 7 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Analytics
Matomo Analytics
Framework
Bootstrap 3.4.1Google Search Console Microsoft Open Graph RequireJS 2.3.5 Ruby on Rails Usercentrics jQuery 3.6.0 jQuery Migrate 3.3.2 jQuery UI 1.12.1
Runtime
Ruby
CDN
F5 BigIP

All Detected Technologies (13)

F5's BIG-IP is a family of products covering software and hardware designed around application availability, access control, and security solutions.

Categories Reverse proxies Website https://www.f5.com/products/big-ip-services Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Ruby is an open-source object-oriented programming language.

Categories Programming languages Website https://ruby-lang.org Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Bootstrap is a free and open-source CSS framework directed at responsive, mobile-first front-end web development. It contains CSS and JavaScript-based design templates for typography, forms, buttons, navigation, and other interface components.

Categories UI frameworks Website https://getbootstrap.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Found 4 Bootstrap class patterns in HTML
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=XHSgSiW3S-oNc6utmVvWr_K-iNo1ZpYHGDMV1ev8txw
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Low Evidence TXT record: MS=ms65105063

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

RequireJS is a JavaScript library and file loader which manages the dependencies between JavaScript files and in modular programming.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://requirejs.org Detected by BeaverCheck

Ruby on Rails is a server-side web application framework written in Ruby under the MIT License.

Categories Web frameworks Website https://rubyonrails.org Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Usercentrics is a SaaS enterprise solution for Consent Management (CMP) that helps enterprise customers to obtain, manage and document the user consent.

Categories Cookie compliance Website https://usercentrics.com Detected by BeaverCheck

jQuery is a JavaScript library which is a free, open-source software designed to simplify HTML DOM tree traversal and manipulation, as well as event handling, CSS animation, and Ajax.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://jquery.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Query Migrate is a javascript library that allows you to preserve the compatibility of your jQuery code developed for versions of jQuery older than 1.9.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://github.com/jquery/jquery-migrate Detected by BeaverCheck

jQuery UI is a collection of GUI widgets, animated visual effects, and themes implemented with jQuery, Cascading Style Sheets, and HTML.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://jqueryui.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Matomo Analytics is a free and open-source web analytics application, that runs on a PHP/MySQL web-server.

Categories Analytics Website https://matomo.org Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Observations (3)

No build tool detected

A framework (Bootstrap) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Bootstrap version may be outdated

Detected Bootstrap 3.4.1. The current major version is 5. Consider updating for security patches and new features.

→ Security

Complex technology stack detected

13 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmpg.de)](https://beavercheck.com/results/a15b4231-6186-4f22-844d-a658763e1187)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/a15b4231-6186-4f22-844d-a658763e1187"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmpg.de" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmpg.de

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 9h total → projected B (83)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+4

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

2 findings 1h → C (79)
  • · HSTS header is missing
  • · 4 link(s) with no accessible text

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+4

Medium effort, high structural impact

3 findings 8h → B (83)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found
  • · is missing width/height — may cause layout shift

Send Feedback