Skip to content
https://theseocover.com Export & share
Scanned
2026-09-22 14:14 UTC
Worker
🇧🇷 Sao Paulo
Duration
3.0m
Vs prev

Global Performance

6/6 locations

Acceptable global latency — average 278ms across 6 locations, fastest from New York (77ms), slowest from Singapore (751ms). Cloudflare edge cache (MISS). 1 location above the 500ms target.

Brazil - Sao Paulo
Full audit
404ms
DNS 186ms · TLS 16ms
Spain - Madrid
210ms
DNS 42ms · TLS 38ms
United States - Santa Clara
131ms
DNS 18ms · TLS 14ms
United Stated - New York
77ms
DNS 15ms · TLS 13ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
98ms
DNS 17ms · TLS 19ms
Singapore - Singapore
751ms
DNS 181ms · TLS 80ms
CDN: Cloudflare (MISS) · Avg TTFB: 278ms · Cache: public, max-age=0, must-revalidate

Audit overview

Compliance needs attention; the rest of the categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

3

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

2

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Your mail setup has problems.

theseocover.com fails 1 mail check: DMARC policy is none — monitoring only. This is the kind of misconfiguration that sends your mail to spam.

Get a full deliverability audit — €179, 48h →

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

26 image(s) missing alt attribute

Each image without alt text is a WCAG 1.1.1 failure — invisible to screen-reader users, lost from Google Image Search.

Accessibility › Alt Text Quality
Critical: 3

26 image-in-link without alt text

Image-only links with no alt create empty links — screen-reader users hear 'link' with no destination context.

Accessibility › Alt Text Quality
Critical: 4

7 link(s) with no accessible text

Links with no accessible text (empty <a></a>, image-only no alt, icon-only no aria-label) are unidentifiable to screen readers.

Accessibility › Link & Button Quality
Critical: 5

Soft 404: server returns HTTP 200 for non-existent pages

Soft 404s (HTTP 200 for missing pages) confuse Google — it indexes the 'not found' page as real content and ranks it.

Accessibility › 404 Error Page
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
1 security gap detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
4 accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

$600 investment → $15,858/month returns + USD 157,500 risk avoided

Investment
$600
6.0 h · 5 findings
Monthly returns
$15,858
$190,300/yr
Payback
0.0 mo
+31617% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided USD 157,500
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
$5000.0 mo payback · +37960% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
$150 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

7 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~30%.

Barriers
7
3 crit 4 warn
Bounce delta
+30pp
added vs baseline
Score
58
C
Speed
2
Trust
1
Usability
0
Content
1
Nav
3
  • Page takes 7.3s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 4.8s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • Page feels frozen for 146.7s
    Clicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs
    → Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
  • 8 broken link(s) on the page
    Clicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends
    → Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • Content is hard to read
    Graduate-level reading difficulty — limits the addressable audience for product or blog pages
    → Shorten sentences; replace jargon with plain language; target Flesch ease ≥60

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

$600 6.0 developer hours at $100/hr
Quick wins
$150 3 fixes in ~90 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

$ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

$10,386 / month at risk ~$124,627 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

$157,500

ADA Title IIICCPA/CPRA
  • Trackers detected but no cookie policy found
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • Trackers detected but no privacy policy found
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • 1 of 3 <nav> elements are unlabeled
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000

Bounce-Rate Cost

$10,385 /mo

+29.7pp bounce · ~2,967 lost visitors/mo

CPC: USD 3.50

Bandwidth Waste

$0.57 /mo

7121.8 MB/mo × 0.080 USD/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~712 KB per page load
    Saves $0.57/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

27
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
90
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

4.82 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

7.27 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

146.69 s

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.006

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

22.55 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

165.56 s

Desktop

49
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
90
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

900 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

2.12 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

21.82 s

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.008

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

5.58 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

32.98 s

Categories

8
Avg score 82.9

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Angular · 70 peers
You 83
·
Avg 73
+10 above average
0 50 100
Better than 97% of Angular sites See full Angular benchmark →
Google Font API · 1271 peers
You 83
·
Avg 75
+8 above average
0 50 100
Security P98SEO P89Compliance P13Sustainability P84Performance P83Infrastructure P23Accessibility P74Content P42

Top 10% of Google Font API sites score 85+ on Compliance; you're at 67 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 91% of Google Font API sites See full Google Font API benchmark →

Technology stack

Angular 20.3.9, on TypeScript, with Cloudflare CDN

13 technologies detected 3 stack layers 2 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Framework
Angular 20.3.9 GSAP Google Font API Google Search Console HSTS HTTP/3 Lenis 1.3.23 Open Graph RSS Zone.js
Runtime
TypeScript
CDN
Cloudflare Cloudinary

All Detected Technologies (13)

Cloudflare is a web-infrastructure and website-security company, providing content-delivery-network services, DDoS mitigation, Internet security, and distributed domain-name-server services.

Categories CDN Website https://www.cloudflare.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header in redirect: cloudflare
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Cloudinary is an end-to-end image- and video-management solution for websites and mobile apps, covering everything from image and video uploads, storage, manipulations, optimisations to delivery.

Categories CDN, Digital asset management Website https://cloudinary.com Detected by BeaverCheck

TypeScript is an open-source language which builds on JavaScript by adding static type definitions.

Categories Programming languages Website https://www.typescriptlang.org Detected by BeaverCheck

Angular is a TypeScript-based open-source web application framework led by the Angular Team at Google.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://angular.io Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

GSAP is an animation library that allows you to create animations with JavaScript.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://greensock.com/gsap Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Font API is a web service that supports open-source font files that can be used on your web designs.

Categories Font scripts Website https://fonts.google.com/ Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=cLOj0sQMxytmWl1mT0XnQpYjr8igOqtIqfxX4vBRnbI

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

HTTP/3 is the third major version of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol used to exchange information on the World Wide Web.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://httpwg.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Lenis is a smooth scroll library to normalise the scrolling experience across devices.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website http://lenis.darkroom.engineering Detected by BeaverCheck

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

RSS is a family of web feed formats used to publish frequently updated works—such as blog entries, news headlines, audio, and video—in a standardized format.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://github.com/angular/angular/tree/master/packages/zone.js Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (2)

No build tool detected

A framework (Angular) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

13 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftheseocover.com)](https://beavercheck.com/sites/theseocover.com)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/theseocover.com"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftheseocover.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftheseocover.com

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 6h total → projected A (90)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+4

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

3 findings 2h → B (87)
  • · 26 image-in-link without alt text
  • · 7 link(s) with no accessible text
  • · Soft 404: server returns HTTP 200 for non-existent pages

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+3

Medium effort, high structural impact

2 findings 4h → A (90)
  • · 26 image(s) missing alt attribute
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Send Feedback