Skip to content
CZ · CZK (Kč) · Estimated Applicable regulations: GDPR · ePrivacy Directive · EAA Dev cost: CZK 1,100/hr How jurisdiction is detected
Scanned
2026-09-08 14:31 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
59.00s
Vs prev

Global Performance

6/6 locations

High global latency — average 847ms across 6 locations, fastest from Amsterdam (215ms), slowest from Sao Paulo (1441ms). Assets on Cloudflare (host cdn.vidstack.io, 4 assets); document served directly from origin (Linode). Cache-Control disables caching (no-store). 4 locations above the 500ms target.

Spain - Madrid
Full audit
331ms
DNS 110ms · TLS 54ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
215ms
DNS 92ms · TLS 21ms
United States - Santa Clara
1314ms
DNS 513ms · TLS 296ms
Singapore - Singapore
1195ms
DNS 336ms · TLS 318ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
1441ms
DNS 364ms · TLS 405ms
United Stated - New York
586ms
DNS 98ms · TLS 172ms
CDN: Cloudflare (assets only) · Avg TTFB: 847ms · Cache: no-store

Audit overview

Content and Sustainability need attention; the other categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

4

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

1

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Cookie '.AspNetCore.Antiforgery.VyLW6ORzMgk' is missing the Secure flag

A cookie without the Secure flag can leak over HTTP — in HSTS-protected sites, this is still a defense-in-depth gap.

Security › Cookie Security
Critical: 2

HSTS header is missing

Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 3

Page weighs 16.6 MB (6.7 MB transferred)

Informational: total page weight (uncompressed) and bytes actually transferred over the wire.

Performance › Page Weight Budget
Critical: 4

1 button(s) with no accessible text

Buttons with no accessible text (icon-only, no aria-label) can't be activated by voice control or understood by screen readers.

Accessibility › Link & Button Quality
Warning: 5

128 inline style attribute(s) detected

Inline style attributes force `style-src 'unsafe-inline'` in any CSP -- effectively negating CSP's XSS-mitigation value for stylesheets.

Security › CSP Inline-Style Readiness
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Your LCP of 34.6s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 1 performance issue below directly contributes to it. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
3 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
Your LCP is 34.6s — fixing the 1 performance critical could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.
1 accessibility issue excludes users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

CZK 5,500 investment → CZK 84,795/month returns + EUR 500,000 risk avoided

Investment
CZK 5.500
5.0 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
CZK 84.795
CZK 1.017.535/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+18401% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided EUR 500.000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
CZK 1.1000.0 mo payback · +92403% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
CZK 1.100 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

7 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~34%.

Barriers
7
4 crit 3 warn
Bounce delta
+34pp
added vs baseline
Score
51
D
Speed
2
Trust
2
Usability
0
Content
1
Nav
2
  • Page takes 34.6s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 32.1s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • Page feels frozen for 5.1s
    Clicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs
    → Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
  • Mixed content on HTTPS page
    Browsers block insecure subresources — broken images, missing scripts, warning badge
    → Change http:// URLs inside the page to https:// (or protocol-relative)
  • 21 broken link(s) on the page
    Clicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends
    → Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

Kč5,500 5.0 developer hours at Kč1100/hr
Quick wins
Kč1,100 3 fixes in ~60 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

/hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

CZK 84.795 / month at risk ~CZK 1.017.535 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

€500.000

EAA
  • 2 of 2 <nav> elements are unlabeled
    EAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000
  • Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)
    EAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000
  • Heading level skipped: H2 → H5 (missing H3)
    EAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000

Bounce-Rate Cost

CZK 84.755 /mo

+33.9pp bounce · ~3,390 lost visitors/mo

CPC: CZK 25.00

Bandwidth Waste

CZK 39 /mo

21165.9 MB/mo × 1.860 CZK/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~2.1 MB per page load
    Saves CZK 39/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 4 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

26
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
87
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

9.82 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

34.59 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

5.09 s

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

10.68 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

34.95 s

Desktop

70
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
93
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

513 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

754 ms

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

1.75 s

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.007

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

686 ms

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

5.99 s

Categories

8
Avg score 79.1

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Framework · 1959 peers
You 81
·
Avg 76
At average
0 50 100
Better than 79% of Framework sites
Bootstrap · 1038 peers
You 81
·
Avg 75
+6 above average
0 50 100
Security P91SEO P88Content P17Accessibility P77Sustainability P24Performance P71Infrastructure P59Compliance P56

Top 10% of Bootstrap sites score 95+ on Content; you're at 68 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 86% of Bootstrap sites See full Bootstrap benchmark →

Technology stack

Blazor, hosted on Snowplow Analytics, with Nginx CDN

12 technologies detected 4 stack layers 4 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Analytics
Facebook Pixel Google Tag Manager
Framework
Blazor Bootstrap 5.3.5Google Search Console Microsoft ASP.NET Open Graph Priority Hints Tailwind CSS Ubuntu
CDN
Nginx 1.18.0
Hosting
Snowplow Analytics

All Detected Technologies (12)

Nginx is a web server that can also be used as a reverse proxy, load balancer, mail proxy and HTTP cache.

Categories Web servers, Reverse proxies Website https://nginx.org/en Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header: nginx/1.18.0 (Ubuntu)
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Snowplow is an open-source behavioral data management platform for businesses.

Categories Analytics, IaaS Website https://snowplowanalytics.com Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Web frameworks Website https://dotnet.microsoft.com/apps/aspnet/web-apps/blazor Detected by BeaverCheck

Bootstrap is a free and open-source CSS framework directed at responsive, mobile-first front-end web development. It contains CSS and JavaScript-based design templates for typography, forms, buttons, navigation, and other interface components.

Categories UI frameworks Website https://getbootstrap.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Found 4 Bootstrap class patterns in HTML
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=s5DH_dItH7M1BRvS3KyrCmANMHx4eUAoa0lEG2kXWdM

ASP.NET is an open-source, server-side web-application framework designed for web development to produce dynamic web pages.

Categories Web frameworks Website https://www.asp.net Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

Priority Hints exposes a mechanism for developers to signal a relative priority for browsers to consider when fetching resources.

Categories Performance Website https://wicg.github.io/priority-hints/ Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Framework Website https://tailwindcss.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Found 86 unique Tailwind utility classes in HTML

Ubuntu is a free and open-source operating system on Linux for the enterprise server, desktop, cloud, and IoT.

Categories Operating systems Website https://www.ubuntu.com/server Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Facebook pixel is an analytics tool that allows you to measure the effectiveness of your advertising.

Categories Analytics Website https://facebook.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Tag Manager is a tag management system (TMS) that allows you to quickly and easily update measurement codes and related code fragments collectively known as tags on your website or mobile app.

Categories Tag managers Website https://www.google.com/tagmanager Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (2)

No build tool detected

A framework (Blazor) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

12 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpsichologie.cz)](https://beavercheck.com/sites/psichologie.cz)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/psichologie.cz"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpsichologie.cz" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpsichologie.cz

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 5h total → projected A (90)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+9

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

4 findings 1h → A (90)
  • · Page weighs 16.6 MB (6.7 MB transferred)
  • · Cookie '.AspNetCore.Antiforgery.VyLW6ORzMgk' is missing the Secure flag
  • · HSTS header is missing
  • · 1 button(s) with no accessible text

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

Medium effort, high structural impact

1 findings 4h → A (90)
  • · 128 inline style attribute(s) detected

Send Feedback