Skip to content
CZ · CZK (Kč) · Estimated Applicable regulations: GDPR · ePrivacy Directive · EAA Dev cost: CZK 1,100/hr How jurisdiction is detected
Scanned
2026-04-22 23:31 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
48.00s
Vs prev

Audit overview

4 categories need attention: Performance, and 3 others.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

3

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

2

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 3

Page weighs 11.2 MB (5.4 MB transferred)

Informational: total page weight (uncompressed) and bytes actually transferred over the wire.

Performance › Page Weight Budget
Critical: 4

2 link(s) with no accessible text

Links with no accessible text (empty <a></a>, image-only no alt, icon-only no aria-label) are unidentifiable to screen readers.

Accessibility › Link & Button Quality
Critical: 5

4 button(s) with no accessible text

Buttons with no accessible text (icon-only, no aria-label) can't be activated by voice control or understood by screen readers.

Accessibility › Link & Button Quality
What fixing these means. Your site has several issues that may be affecting user experience and business outcomes. Your LCP of 27.0s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 1 performance issue below directly contributes to it. Accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology — an estimated 15% of your potential audience. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
2 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
Your LCP is 27.0s — fixing the 1 performance critical could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.
2 accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

CZK 7,700 investment → CZK 72,488/month returns + EUR 120,500,000 risk avoided

Investment
CZK 7.700
7.0 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
CZK 72.488
CZK 869.856/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+11197% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided EUR 120.500.000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
CZK 7.1500.1 mo payback · +12066% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
CZK 1.100 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

7 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~29%.

Barriers
7
2 crit 5 warn
Bounce delta
+29pp
added vs baseline
Score
65
C
Speed
2
Trust
1
Usability
1
Content
2
Nav
1
  • Page takes 27.0s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 24.5s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • Page feels frozen for 606ms
    Clicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs
    → Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • Viewport disables user zoom
    Visitors with low vision can't read the page — and some jurisdictions treat this as a legal risk
    → Remove user-scalable=no; drop maximum-scale if it's below 2
  • No structured data
    No rich-result eligibility in Google — lower SERP CTR vs competitors with stars and prices
    → Add JSON-LD for your page type (Product, Article, FAQPage, LocalBusiness, …)

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

Kč7,700 7.0 developer hours at Kč1100/hr
Quick wins
Kč1,100 2 fixes in ~60 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

/hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

CZK 72.488 / month at risk ~CZK 869.856 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

€120.500.000

ePrivacy DirectiveGDPREAA
  • No privacy policy link detected
    GDPR: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000
  • Trackers detected but no cookie policy found
    GDPR: EUR 5.000 – EUR 10.000.000
  • Trackers detected but no cookie policy found
    GDPR: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000

Bounce-Rate Cost

CZK 72.456 /mo

+29.0pp bounce · ~2,898 lost visitors/mo

CPC: CZK 25.00

Bandwidth Waste

CZK 32 /mo

17113.8 MB/mo × 1.860 CZK/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~1.7 MB per page load
    Saves CZK 32/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

40
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
85
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
77
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
91
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

14.21 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

26.97 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

606 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

14.21 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

27.06 s

Desktop

64
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
73
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
77
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
82
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.37 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

5.20 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

90 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.097

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

2.58 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

5.23 s

Categories

8
Avg score 69.6

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

core-js · 1582 peers
You 69
·
Avg 72
At average
0 50 100
SEO P1Compliance P8Sustainability P10Accessibility P13Security P68Performance P33Content P39Infrastructure P59

Top 10% of core-js sites score 95+ on SEO; you're at 74 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 8% of core-js sites See full core-js benchmark →
Express · 67 peers
You 69
·
Avg 72
At average
0 50 100
Better than 11% of Express sites See full Express benchmark →

Technology stack

Express, hosted on Snowplow Analytics, with Nginx CDN

10 technologies detected 4 stack layers 2 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Analytics
Gemius
Framework
Express Facebook Google Search Console HSTS Open Graph Sentry core-js 3.44.0
CDN
Nginx
Hosting
Snowplow Analytics

All Detected Technologies (10)

Nginx is a web server that can also be used as a reverse proxy, load balancer, mail proxy and HTTP cache.

Categories Web servers, Reverse proxies Website https://nginx.org/en Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header: nginx
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Snowplow is an open-source behavioral data management platform for businesses.

Categories Analytics, IaaS Website https://snowplowanalytics.com Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Framework Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence X-Powered-By: Express in redirect
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: facebook-domain-verification=6mdnuyz6a3d469ymbwxomlgo643ire
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=fVymRyLb4gqjqZmaII90J9P0XN7Z_u41RSs8rBzYbCo

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

Sentry is an open-source platform for workflow productivity, aggregating errors from across the stack in real time.

Categories Issue trackers Website https://sentry.io/ Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

core-js is a modular standard library for JavaScript, with polyfills for cutting-edge ECMAScript features.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://github.com/zloirock/core-js Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Analytics Website https://www.gemius.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (2)

No build tool detected

A framework (Express) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

10 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmapy.cz)](https://beavercheck.com/results/a3ef24ee-8580-46ca-a183-1374f6260827)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/a3ef24ee-8580-46ca-a183-1374f6260827"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmapy.cz" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmapy.cz

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 7h total → projected C (79)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+5

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

3 findings 1h → C (74)
  • · Page weighs 11.2 MB (5.4 MB transferred)
  • · 2 link(s) with no accessible text
  • · 4 button(s) with no accessible text

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+5

Medium effort, high structural impact

2 findings 6h → C (79)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found

Send Feedback