Skip to content
CH · CHF (CHF) · Estimated Applicable regulations: nDSG/FADP Dev cost: CHF 130/hr How jurisdiction is detected
Scanned
2026-04-22 23:09 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
2.5m
Vs prev

Audit overview

Security and Accessibility need attention; the other categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

2

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

3

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Warning: 3

Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing

COEP enforces that all embedded resources opt-in to cross-origin embedding — required for cross-origin isolation features.

Security › Security Headers
Warning: 4

Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy header is missing

COOP isolates your top-level browsing context from cross-origin windows — without it, popup-based side-channel attacks remain possible.

Security › Security Headers
Warning: 5

DMARC policy is none — monitoring only

DMARC p=none collects reports but doesn't actually block spoofed mail — phishing emails still reach inboxes.

Security › Email Security
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
5 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

CHF 1,008 investment → CHF 6,614/month returns + CHF 250,000 risk avoided

Investment
CHF 1’008
7.8 h · 5 findings
Monthly returns
CHF 6’614
CHF 79’364/yr
Payback
0.2 mo
+7777% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided CHF 250’000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
CHF 9100.1 mo payback · +8621% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
CHF 98 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

2 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~21%.

Barriers
2
1 crit 1 warn
Bounce delta
+21pp
added vs baseline
Score
87
A
Speed
0
Trust
1
Usability
1
Content
0
Nav
0
  • No viewport meta tag
    Mobile browsers render at desktop width and shrink — text unreadable, tap targets miniature
    → Add <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1">
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

CHF1,008 7.8 developer hours at CHF130/hr
Quick wins
CHF98 2 fixes in ~45 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

CHF /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

CHF 6’614 / month at risk ~CHF 79’364 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

CHF 250’000

nDSG/FADP
  • No privacy policy link detected
    nDSG/FADP: CHF 1’000 – CHF 250’000

Bounce-Rate Cost

CHF 6’614 /mo

+20.7pp bounce · ~2,067 lost visitors/mo

CPC: CHF 3.20

Bandwidth Waste

CHF 0.00 /mo

67.8 MB/mo × 0.071 CHF/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~7 KB per page load
    Saves CHF 0.00/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 2 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

0
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
71
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
91
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

0 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

0 ms

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

0 ms

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

0 ms

Desktop

0
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
71
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
91
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

0 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

0 ms

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

0 ms

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

0 ms

Categories

6
Avg score 75.0

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Amazon Route 53 · 1003 peers
You 74
·
Avg 72
At average
0 50 100
Accessibility P1Performance P99Sustainability P90Infrastructure P74Security P69Compliance P67

Top 10% of Amazon Route 53 sites score 68+ on Accessibility; you're at 28 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 63% of Amazon Route 53 sites See full Amazon Route 53 benchmark →
Google Workspace · 1764 peers
You 74
·
Avg 74
At average
0 50 100
Accessibility P1Performance P99Compliance P71Sustainability P70Security P58Infrastructure P55

Top 10% of Google Workspace sites score 70+ on Accessibility; you're at 28 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 46% of Google Workspace sites See full Google Workspace benchmark →

Technology stack

Amazon Route 53, on Apache, hosted on Apache HTTP Server

6 technologies detected 3 stack layers 2 with CPE identifier Complex

Stack Architecture

Framework
Amazon Route 53 Google Workspace HSTS OpenSSL 3.2.2
Server
Apache 2.4.64
Hosting
Apache HTTP Server 2.4.64

All Detected Technologies (6)

Categories Server Website https://httpd.apache.org Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header: Apache/2.4.64 (Amazon Linux) OpenSSL/3.2.2

Apache is a free and open-source cross-platform web server software.

Categories Web servers Website https://httpd.apache.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →
Categories DNS Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence NS record: ns-614.awsdns-12.net
Categories Email Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence MX record: aspmx.l.google.com

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

OpenSSL is a software library for applications that secure communications over computer networks against eavesdropping or need to identify the party at the other end.

Categories Web server extensions Website https://openssl.org Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Observations (2)

Server version exposed in headers

The Server header reveals 'Apache 2.4.64'. Exposing exact server versions helps attackers target known vulnerabilities. Consider configuring your server to hide version information.

→ Security

No build tool detected

A framework (Amazon Route 53) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffourmilab.ch)](https://beavercheck.com/results/a50c0d4d-2f31-4ae5-9f8f-5fee37379842)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/a50c0d4d-2f31-4ae5-9f8f-5fee37379842"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffourmilab.ch" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Ffourmilab.ch

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 8h total → projected B (81)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+2

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

2 findings 1h → C (76)
  • · Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy header is missing
  • · DMARC policy is none — monitoring only

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+5

Medium effort, high structural impact

3 findings 7h → B (81)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found
  • · Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing

Send Feedback