Skip to content
Scanned
2026-05-12 11:10 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
57.00s
Vs prev

Global Performance

6/6 locations

High global latency — average 790ms across 6 locations, fastest from Santa Clara (585ms), slowest from Sao Paulo (1297ms). No CDN detected. Cache-Control header is missing. 6 locations above the 500ms target.

Spain - Madrid
Full audit
707ms
DNS 61ms · TLS 217ms
United States - Santa Clara
585ms
DNS 92ms · TLS 167ms
United Stated - New York
685ms
DNS 51ms · TLS 218ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
737ms
DNS 13ms · TLS 243ms
Singapore - Singapore
727ms
DNS 336ms · TLS 138ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
1297ms
DNS 303ms · TLS 336ms
CDN: No CDN · Avg TTFB: 790ms · Cache: No cache headers

Audit overview

Compliance and Content need attention; the other categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

2

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

3

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

HSTS header is missing

Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 3

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 4

22 image(s) missing alt attribute

Each image without alt text is a WCAG 1.1.1 failure — invisible to screen-reader users, lost from Google Image Search.

Accessibility › Alt Text Quality
Critical: 5

No <main> landmark found

Without a <main> landmark, screen-reader users can't skip past the navigation to the page content — every page starts with re-reading the menu.

Accessibility › Landmark Structure
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
3 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
2 accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

$792 investment → $12,802/month returns + USD 157,500 risk avoided

Investment
$792
7.9 h · 5 findings
Monthly returns
$12,802
$153,619/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+19304% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided USD 157,500
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
$6250.0 mo payback · +24479% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
$42 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

8 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~28%.

Barriers
8
1 crit 7 warn
Bounce delta
+28pp
added vs baseline
Score
69
C
Speed
1
Trust
2
Usability
1
Content
3
Nav
1
  • Page takes 10.1s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 7.6s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • Viewport disables user zoom
    Visitors with low vision can't read the page — and some jurisdictions treat this as a legal risk
    → Remove user-scalable=no; drop maximum-scale if it's below 2
  • No Open Graph tags
    Links shared on LinkedIn / Slack / Facebook show bare URLs — referral clicks drop
    → Add og:title, og:description, og:image, og:url to the page head

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

$792 7.9 developer hours at $100/hr
Quick wins
$42 2 fixes in ~25 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

$ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Cost of inaction

$20,532 / month at risk ~$246,384 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

$157,500

ADA Title IIICCPA/CPRA
  • No privacy policy link detected
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • Privacy Policy not detected
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • No <main> landmark found
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
  • No <nav> landmark found
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
  • Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
  • No headings found
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
  • 22 image(s) missing alt attribute
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000

Bounce-Rate Cost

$7,407 /mo

+27.5pp bounce · ~2,753 lost visitors/mo

CPC: USD 2.69

Bandwidth Waste

$0.51 /mo

6343.9 MB/mo × 0.080 USD/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~634 KB per page load
    Saves $0.51/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

58
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
39
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
73
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

4.01 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

10.11 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

182 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.045

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

6.91 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

10.12 s

Desktop

84
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
39
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
73
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

899 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

1.90 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

2.66 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

1.90 s

Categories

8
Avg score 77.0

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Vue.js · 205 peers
You 80
·
Avg 72
+8 above average
0 50 100
Better than 95% of Vue.js sites See full Vue.js benchmark →
Nginx · 952 peers
You 80
·
Avg 74
+6 above average
0 50 100
Compliance P2Security P91SEO P13Accessibility P87Content P14Infrastructure P16Performance P74Sustainability P67

Top 10% of Nginx sites score 86+ on Compliance; you're at 62 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 85% of Nginx sites See full Nginx benchmark →

Technology stack

Vue.js, with Nginx CDN

2 technologies detected 2 stack layers 1 with CPE identifier Minimal

Stack Architecture

Framework
Vue.js
CDN
Nginx

All Detected Technologies (2)

Nginx is a web server that can also be used as a reverse proxy, load balancer, mail proxy and HTTP cache.

Categories Web servers, Reverse proxies Website https://nginx.org/en Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header: nginx
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Vue.js is an open-source model–view–viewmodel JavaScript framework for building user interfaces and single-page applications.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://vuejs.org Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (2)

No build tool detected

A framework (Vue.js) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Minimal technology footprint

Only 2 technologies detected. This suggests a simple setup with minimal dependencies — excellent for performance and security.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmhjys.qingtiankjysz.cfd%2F%23%2F)](https://beavercheck.com/results/a5fbf868-fcef-41ca-b7f9-bf8f63aa80e1)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/a5fbf868-fcef-41ca-b7f9-bf8f63aa80e1"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmhjys.qingtiankjysz.cfd%2F%23%2F" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmhjys.qingtiankjysz.cfd%2F%23%2F

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 8h total → projected B (87)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+4

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

2 findings 0h → B (84)
  • · No <main> landmark found
  • · HSTS header is missing

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+3

Medium effort, high structural impact

3 findings 8h → B (87)
  • · 22 image(s) missing alt attribute
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found

Send Feedback