Global Performance
6/6 locations ✓Acceptable global latency — average 347ms across 6 locations, fastest from Amsterdam (103ms), slowest from Sao Paulo (624ms). No CDN detected. Cache-Control disables caching (no-store). 2 locations above the 500ms target.
Audit overview
Compliance and Sustainability need attention; the other categories are in good shape.
Fix Priority Matrix
5 findingsQuick Wins
3High impact, low effort — start here.
Strategic
2High impact, requires investment.
Easy Improvements
0Small gains, minimal effort.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Deprioritize
0Low impact, high effort — do last.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Screenshots
Top Priorities (5)
Content-Security-Policy header is missing
Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.
Cookie '.AspNetCore.Antiforgery.VyLW6ORzMgk' is missing the Secure flag
A cookie without the Secure flag can leak over HTTP — in HSTS-protected sites, this is still a defense-in-depth gap.
HSTS header is missing
Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.
No Content-Security-Policy header found
Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.
Page weighs 4.5 MB (4.5 MB transferred)
Informational: total page weight (uncompressed) and bytes actually transferred over the wire.
Business case
What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.
Return on investment
€520 investment → €6,058/month returns + EUR 120,500,000 risk avoided
Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.
Conversion barriers
8 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~28%.
- Page takes 25.7s to loadUsers abandon at ~3s — you're 23.2s over the 2.5s threshold→ Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
- No HSTS headerReturning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request→ Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
- No Content-Security-Policy headerHigher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form→ Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
- 1 form field(s) without a labelScreen readers skip unlabeled fields; autofill can't identify them; checkout abandonment spikes→ Associate every input with a visible <label for="…">; add autocomplete attributes
- No Open Graph tagsLinks shared on LinkedIn / Slack / Facebook show bare URLs — referral clicks drop→ Add og:title, og:description, og:image, og:url to the page head
Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.
Remediation cost
Start here for the best return on investment
Cost by category
Cost by effort level
Adjust assumptions
Team composition
Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.
Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead
Cost of inaction
Compliance Risk
€120,500,000
- No privacy policy link detectedRGPD: EUR 10,000 – EUR 20,000,000
- 1 non-essential cookie(s) set without consent bannerRGPD: EUR 5,000 – EUR 10,000,000
- 1 non-essential cookie(s) set without consent bannerRGPD: EUR 10,000 – EUR 20,000,000
- 1 non-essential cookie(s) set without consent bannerePrivacy Directive: EUR 5,000 – EUR 100,000,000
- Privacy Policy not detectedRGPD: EUR 10,000 – EUR 20,000,000
- No <nav> landmark foundEAA: EUR 1,000 – EUR 500,000
- Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)EAA: EUR 1,000 – EUR 500,000
- No H1 heading foundEAA: EUR 1,000 – EUR 500,000
- 1 control(s) without accessible labelEAA: EUR 1,000 – EUR 500,000
Bounce-Rate Cost
€6,057 /mo
+27.5pp bounce · ~2,753 lost visitors/mo
CPC: EUR 2.20
Bandwidth Waste
€1.04 /mo
14069.4 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB
- Optimize transfer: save ~1.4 MB per page loadSaves €1.04/mo
Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.
Unique monthly visitors from your analytics
Purchases, signups, or key actions
Optional — for revenue estimation
more engaged visitors from reduced bounce
Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value
How this is calculated
Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.
Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.
These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary
Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers
Lighthouse
Mobile
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
24.51 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
25.70 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
137 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.000
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
24.51 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
25.70 s
Desktop
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
1.14 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
4.27 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
72 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.001
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
1.14 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
4.33 s
Categories
8Performance
Page weighs 4.5 MB (4.5 MB transferred)
Security
Content-Security-Policy header is missing
Accessibility
All checks pass
SEO
All checks pass
Infrastructure
All checks pass
Compliance
All checks pass
Content
All checks pass
Sustainability
All checks pass
How you compare
Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.
Top 10% of Google Font API sites score 86+ on Compliance; you're at 59 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.
Technology stack
Blazor, hosted on Kestrel
Stack Architecture
Blazor 
Google Font API 
HTTP/3 
Microsoft ASP.NET 
Monaco Editor 
MudBlazor 
Tailwind CSS 
Kestrel All Detected Technologies (8)
Google Font API is a web service that supports open-source font files that can be used on your web designs.
HTTP/3 is the third major version of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol used to exchange information on the World Wide Web.
ASP.NET is an open-source, server-side web-application framework designed for web development to produce dynamic web pages.
Monaco Editor is the code editor that powers VS Code. Monaco Editor is a tool in the text editor category of a tech stack.
MudBlazor is a component library for Blazor implementing Material Design.
Observations (2)
No build tool detected
A framework (Blazor) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.
Complex technology stack detected
8 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.
Show your score
Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.
This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.
[](https://beavercheck.com/results/a780565d-13fe-434a-a372-cfece44146ef)<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/a780565d-13fe-434a-a372-cfece44146ef"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2FVanessave.ilysix.fr" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2FVanessave.ilysix.frExport & share
Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.
Copies markdown to clipboard
Fix Plan
Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.
Three-week fix plan
2 sprints · 6h total → projected B (86)
Sprint 1: Quick Wins
+7Highest ROI — low effort, high impact
- · Page weighs 4.5 MB (4.5 MB transferred)
- · Cookie '.AspNetCore.Antiforgery.VyLW6ORzMgk' is missing the Secure flag
- · HSTS header is missing
Sprint 2: Core Fixes
+1Medium effort, high structural impact
- · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
- · No Content-Security-Policy header found