Audit overview
Security and Accessibility need attention; the other categories are in good shape.
Fix Priority Matrix
5 findingsQuick Wins
3High impact, low effort — start here.
Strategic
2High impact, requires investment.
Easy Improvements
0Small gains, minimal effort.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Deprioritize
0Low impact, high effort — do last.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Screenshots
Your mail setup has problems.
theonion.org fails 2 mail checks: No DMARC record found, MTA-STS policy file present but DNS record missing. This is the kind of misconfiguration that sends your mail to spam.
Top Priorities (5)
Connection is not encrypted (plain HTTP)
Plain-HTTP sites leak everything — credentials, session cookies, browsing history — to anyone on the network path.
Content-Security-Policy header is missing
Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.
HSTS header is missing
Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.
No favicon or icon links detected
Without a favicon, your tab shows a blank icon and bookmarks look unbranded — amateur signal in every browser surface.
Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing
COEP enforces that all embedded resources opt-in to cross-origin embedding — required for cross-origin isolation features.
Business case
What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.
Return on investment
AUD 633 investment → AUD 12,402/month returns
Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.
Conversion barriers
4 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~35%.
- Site is not served over HTTPSBrowsers show "Not Secure" in the URL bar — visitors abandon before reading→ Install a TLS certificate (Let's Encrypt is free) and redirect HTTP → HTTPS
- No viewport meta tagMobile browsers render at desktop width and shrink — text unreadable, tap targets miniature→ Add <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1">
- No HSTS headerReturning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request→ Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
- No Content-Security-Policy headerHigher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form→ Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.
Remediation cost
Start here for the best return on investment
Cost by category
Cost by effort level
Adjust assumptions
Team composition
Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.
Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead
Warning:Cost of inaction
Bounce-Rate Cost
AUD 12,402 /mo
+35.4pp bounce · ~3,543 lost visitors/mo
CPC: AUD 3.50
Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.
Unique monthly visitors from your analytics
Purchases, signups, or key actions
Optional — for revenue estimation
more engaged visitors from reduced bounce
Fix 4 critical issues to capture this value
How this is calculated
Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.
Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.
These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary
Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers
Lighthouse
Categories
4How you compare
Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.
Top 10% of Apache sites score 77+ on Accessibility; you're at 52 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.
Technology stack
Apache, hosted on Apache HTTP Server
Stack Architecture
All Detected Technologies (2)
Apache is a free and open-source cross-platform web server software.
Observations (1)
Minimal technology footprint
Only 2 technologies detected. This suggests a simple setup with minimal dependencies — excellent for performance and security.
Show your score
Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.
This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.
[](https://beavercheck.com/sites/theonion.org)<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/theonion.org"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=http%3A%2F%2Ftheonion.org" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=http%3A%2F%2Ftheonion.orgFix Plan
Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.
Three-week fix plan
2 sprints · 6h total → projected B (82)
Sprint 1: Quick Wins
+11Highest ROI — low effort, high impact
- · HSTS header is missing
- · No favicon or icon links detected
- · Connection is not encrypted (plain HTTP)
Sprint 2: Core Fixes
+3Medium effort, high structural impact
- · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
- · Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing

