Skip to content
https://nu11cyber.com Export & share
Recent Trends
Performance stable →
95
TTFB stable →
747ms
FCP stable →
1.4s
LCP stable →
2.8s
Scanned
2026-05-28 10:41 UTC
Worker
🇸🇬 Singapore
Duration
48.00s
Vs prev
Improved by +4

Global Performance

6/6 locations

High global latency — average 2331ms across 6 locations, fastest from Santa Clara (493ms), slowest from Singapore (7307ms). Cloudflare edge cache (DYNAMIC). Cache-Control disables caching (no-store). 5 locations above the 500ms target.

Singapore - Singapore
Full audit
7307ms
DNS 12ms · TLS 11ms
Spain - Madrid
703ms
DNS 44ms · TLS 22ms
United States - Santa Clara
493ms
DNS 10ms · TLS 7ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
734ms
DNS 140ms · TLS 10ms
United Stated - New York
652ms
DNS 6ms · TLS 11ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
4095ms
DNS 9ms · TLS 8ms
CDN: Cloudflare (DYNAMIC) · Avg TTFB: 2331ms · Cache: no-store

Audit overview

All categories sit comfortably above the 70 threshold; this is a clean audit.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

4

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

1

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Soft 404: server returns HTTP 200 for non-existent pages

Soft 404s (HTTP 200 for missing pages) confuse Google — it indexes the 'not found' page as real content and ranks it.

Accessibility › 404 Error Page
Warning: 2

2 render-blocking <script src> tag(s) without async/defer

Performance issues directly impact user engagement and conversion rates.

Performance › JavaScript Blocking
Warning: 3

HSTS max-age is too short (0s, should be ≥ 31536000s)

Short HSTS max-age leaves a downgrade-attack window every time the cache expires — set ≥ 1 year.

Security › Security Headers
Warning: 4

Unattributable: 408ms CPU time

Informational: CPU time spent on this resource. Total >1s is a perf budget violation.

Performance › JS Execution Cost
Warning: 5

frame-ancestors directive is missing

Security gaps expose your site and users to attacks, eroding trust.

Security › Content Security Policy
What fixing these means. Your site is in great shape. The remaining improvements are refinements rather than critical fixes. Your LCP of 3.3s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 2 performance issues below directly contribute to it. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your search visibility.
1 accessibility issue excludes users who rely on assistive technology.
Your LCP is 3.3s — fixing the 2 performance criticals could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.
2 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

¥1,079 investment → ¥52,249/month returns + CNY 50,000,000 risk avoided

Investment
¥1,079
3.1 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
¥52,249
¥626,983/yr
Payback
0.0 mo
+57999% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided CNY 50,000,000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
¥9040.0 mo payback · +69244% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
¥379 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

6 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~19%.

Barriers
6
6 warn
Bounce delta
+19pp
added vs baseline
Score
82
B
Speed
1
Trust
2
Usability
1
Content
1
Nav
1
  • Page loads in 3.3s
    Every additional 100ms above 2.5s costs conversions — you're 805ms over
    → Target <2.5s LCP: defer non-critical scripts and optimize the hero image
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • Layout shifts during page load
    Content movement causes mis-clicks on CTAs and form fields
    → Add width/height to images; reserve space for late-loading embeds
  • Thin content
    Under 300 words — visitors bounce looking for substance, search engines rank competitors first
    → Add a substantive FAQ, product detail, or case-study section

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

¥1,079 3.1 developer hours at ¥350/hr
Quick wins
¥379 3 fixes in ~65 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

¥ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

¥46,614 / month at risk ~¥559,373 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

¥50,000,000

PIPL
  • 1 non-essential cookie(s) set without consent banner
    PIPL: CNY 100,000 – CNY 50,000,000

Bounce-Rate Cost

¥46,614 /mo

+18.6pp bounce · ~1,865 lost visitors/mo

CPC: CNY 25.00

Bandwidth Waste

¥0.56 /mo

985.6 MB/mo × 0.571 CNY/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~99 KB per page load
    Saves ¥0.56/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 1 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

83
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
100
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
88
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

2.52 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

3.30 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.141

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

2.55 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

3.30 s

Desktop

99
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
100
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
88
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

710 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

804 ms

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.050

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

875 ms

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

804 ms

Categories

8
Avg score 93.5

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

HSTS · 2531 peers
You 93
·
Avg 75
+18 above average
0 50 100
Accessibility P99Security P98Sustainability P96Performance P95Compliance P93Content P93Infrastructure P70SEO P49

Top 10% of HSTS sites score 96+ on SEO; you're at 91 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 98% of HSTS sites See full HSTS benchmark →
HTTP/3 · 1485 peers
You 93
·
Avg 75
+18 above average
0 50 100
Security P99Accessibility P99Performance P95Compliance P94Content P94Sustainability P93Infrastructure P61SEO P58

Top 10% of HTTP/3 sites score 96+ on SEO; you're at 91 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 99% of HTTP/3 sites See full HTTP/3 benchmark →

Technology stack

HSTS, with Cloudflare CDN

6 technologies detected 2 stack layers 2 with CPE identifier Complex

Stack Architecture

Framework
HSTS HTTP/3 Open Graph React 18.3.1
CDN
Cloudflare unpkg

All Detected Technologies (6)

Cloudflare is a web-infrastructure and website-security company, providing content-delivery-network services, DDoS mitigation, Internet security, and distributed domain-name-server services.

Categories CDN Website https://www.cloudflare.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header in redirect: cloudflare
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →
Categories CDN Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence Script URL contains unpkg.com: https://unpkg.com/react@18/umd/react.production.min.js

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

HTTP/3 is the third major version of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol used to exchange information on the World Wide Web.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://httpwg.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

React is an open-source JavaScript library for building user interfaces or UI components.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://reactjs.org Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL: https://unpkg.com/react@18/umd/react.production.min.js, Script URL: https://unpkg.com/react-dom@18/umd/react-dom.production.min.js
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Observations (1)

No build tool detected

A framework (HSTS) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fnu11cyber.com)](https://beavercheck.com/results/a87f096e-a6a9-44e9-95e1-e5ec7efff691)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/a87f096e-a6a9-44e9-95e1-e5ec7efff691"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fnu11cyber.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fnu11cyber.com

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 3h total → projected A+ (97)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+4

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

4 findings 1h → A+ (97)
  • · Soft 404: server returns HTTP 200 for non-existent pages
  • · Unattributable: 408ms CPU time
  • · HSTS max-age is too short (0s, should be ≥ 31536000s)
  • · frame-ancestors directive is missing

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

Medium effort, high structural impact

1 findings 2h → A+ (97)
  • · 2 render-blocking <script src> tag(s) without async/defer

Send Feedback