Audit overview
4 categories need attention: Performance, and 3 others.
Fix Priority Matrix
5 findingsQuick Wins
3High impact, low effort — start here.
Strategic
2High impact, requires investment.
Easy Improvements
0Small gains, minimal effort.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Deprioritize
0Low impact, high effort — do last.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Screenshots
Top Priorities (5)
Content-Security-Policy header is missing
Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.
No Content-Security-Policy header found
Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.
Page weighs 27.1 MB (18.5 MB transferred)
Informational: total page weight (uncompressed) and bytes actually transferred over the wire.
2 link(s) with no accessible text
Links with no accessible text (empty <a></a>, image-only no alt, icon-only no aria-label) are unidentifiable to screen readers.
Soft 404: server returns HTTP 200 for non-existent pages
Soft 404s (HTTP 200 for missing pages) confuse Google — it indexes the 'not found' page as real content and ranks it.
Business case
What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.
Return on investment
€385 investment → €8,052/month returns + EUR 120,500,000 risk avoided
Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.
Conversion barriers
6 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~26%.
- Page takes 12.4s to loadUsers abandon at ~3s — you're 9.9s over the 2.5s threshold→ Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
- Page feels frozen for 2.8sClicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs→ Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
- No HSTS headerReturning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request→ Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
- No Content-Security-Policy headerHigher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form→ Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
- No structured dataNo rich-result eligibility in Google — lower SERP CTR vs competitors with stars and prices→ Add JSON-LD for your page type (Product, Article, FAQPage, LocalBusiness, …)
Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.
Remediation cost
Start here for the best return on investment
Cost by category
Cost by effort level
Adjust assumptions
Team composition
Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.
Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead
Warning:Cost of inaction
Compliance Risk
€120.500.000
- No privacy policy link detectedGDPR: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000
- Trackers detected but no cookie policy foundGDPR: EUR 5.000 – EUR 10.000.000
- Trackers detected but no cookie policy foundGDPR: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000
Bounce-Rate Cost
€5.717 /mo
+26.0pp bounce · ~2,598 lost visitors/mo
CPC: EUR 2.20
Bandwidth Waste
€4,31 /mo
58127.4 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB
- Optimize transfer: save ~5.8 MB per page loadSaves €4,31/mo
Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.
Unique monthly visitors from your analytics
Purchases, signups, or key actions
Optional — for revenue estimation
more engaged visitors from reduced bounce
Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value
How this is calculated
Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.
Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.
These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary
Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers
Lighthouse
Mobile
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
3.84 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
12.36 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
2.76 s
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.000
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
11.26 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
26.81 s
Desktop
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
1.13 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
1.66 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
304 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.001
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
3.65 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
5.12 s
Categories
8Performance
Page weighs 27.1 MB (18.5 MB transferred)
Security
Content-Security-Policy header is missing
Accessibility
2 link(s) with no accessible text
SEO
All checks pass
Infrastructure
All checks pass
Compliance
All checks pass
Content
All checks pass
Sustainability
All checks pass
How you compare
Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.
Top 10% of Facebook sites score 86+ on Sustainability; you're at 54 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.
Technology stack
Facebook, on Emotion, hosted on Next.js
Stack Architecture
Google Tag Manager 
Framer Motion Google Search Console Google Workspace HSTS 
MUI Material UI Microsoft 
Open Graph 
React 
Swiper 
Varnish 
Vimeo 
Webpack 
Emotion 
Turbopack 
Next.js 16.0.10 Next.js App Router All Detected Technologies (19)
Next.js is a React framework for developing single page Javascript applications.
The Next.js App Router is a new paradigm for building applications using React's latest features.
Emotion is a library designed for writing CSS styles with JavaScript.
Turbopack is an incremental bundler for JavaScript and TypeScript, written in Rust and integrated into the Next.js framework for optimized build performance.
Framer Motion is a modern animation library for JavaScript, React, and Vue.
HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.
MUI(formerly Material UI) is a simple and customisable component library to build faster, beautiful, and more accessible React applications.
Material UI is a simple and customisable component library to build faster, beautiful, and more accessible React applications.
Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.
React is an open-source JavaScript library for building user interfaces or UI components.
Swiper is a JavaScript library that creates modern touch sliders with hardware-accelerated transitions.
Varnish is a reverse caching proxy.
Vimeo is a video hosting, sharing and services platform. Vimeo operation an ad-free basis by providing subscription plans.
Webpack is an open-source JavaScript module bundler.
Google Tag Manager is a tag management system (TMS) that allows you to quickly and easily update measurement codes and related code fragments collectively known as tags on your website or mobile app.
Observations (2)
No build tool detected
A framework (Facebook) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.
Complex technology stack detected
19 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.
Show your score
Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.
This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.
[](https://beavercheck.com/results/aaa95a70-069d-47dd-a4f7-a17849dbbbf8)<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/aaa95a70-069d-47dd-a4f7-a17849dbbbf8"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Funipd.it" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Funipd.itExport & share
Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.
Copies markdown to clipboard
Fix Plan
Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.
Three-week fix plan
2 sprints · 7h total → projected B (80)
Sprint 1: Quick Wins
+6Highest ROI — low effort, high impact
- · Page weighs 27.1 MB (18.5 MB transferred)
- · 2 link(s) with no accessible text
- · Soft 404: server returns HTTP 200 for non-existent pages
Sprint 2: Core Fixes
+5Medium effort, high structural impact
- · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
- · No Content-Security-Policy header found