Skip to content
https://hornbach.de Export & share
DE · EUR (€) · Estimated Applicable regulations: DSGVO · ePrivacy Directive · EAA Dev cost: €90/hr How jurisdiction is detected
Scanned
2026-05-10 11:19 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
54.00s
Vs prev

Global Performance

6/6 locations

Excellent global latency — average 80ms across 6 locations, fastest from Amsterdam (13ms), slowest from Sao Paulo (364ms). No CDN detected. Cache-Control header is missing.

Spain - Madrid
Full audit
32ms
DNS 27ms · TLS 3ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
13ms
DNS 4ms · TLS 7ms
United States - Santa Clara
14ms
DNS 7ms · TLS 5ms
Singapore - Singapore
15ms
DNS 9ms · TLS 5ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
364ms
DNS 354ms · TLS 7ms
United Stated - New York
40ms
DNS 33ms · TLS 5ms
CDN: No CDN · Avg TTFB: 80ms · Cache: No cache headers

Audit overview

All categories sit comfortably above the 70 threshold; this is a clean audit.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

3

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

2

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

HSTS header is missing

Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 3

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 4

Page weighs 7.8 MB (4.4 MB transferred)

Informational: total page weight (uncompressed) and bytes actually transferred over the wire.

Performance › Page Weight Budget
Critical: 5

1 link(s) with no accessible text

Links with no accessible text (empty <a></a>, image-only no alt, icon-only no aria-label) are unidentifiable to screen readers.

Accessibility › Link & Button Quality
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Your LCP of 11.1s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 1 performance issue below directly contributes to it. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
3 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
Your LCP is 11.1s — fixing the 1 performance critical could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.
1 accessibility issue excludes users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

€608 investment → €5,995/month returns + EUR 20,500,000 risk avoided

Investment
€608
6.8 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
€5,995
€71,935/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+11741% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided EUR 20,500,000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
€5630.1 mo payback · +12688% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
€68 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

6 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~26%.

Barriers
6
2 crit 4 warn
Bounce delta
+26pp
added vs baseline
Score
68
C
Speed
2
Trust
2
Usability
0
Content
0
Nav
2
  • Page takes 11.1s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 8.6s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • 3 broken link(s) on the page
    Clicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends
    → Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab
  • High main-thread blocking time
    Page is non-interactive for 430ms after first paint
    → Defer third-party scripts and split large bundles
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

€608 6.8 developer hours at €90/hr
Quick wins
€68 2 fixes in ~45 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

/hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Cost of inaction

€1,710,803 / month at risk ~€20,529,635 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

€20,500,000

DSGVOEAA
  • Privacy Policy not detected
    DSGVO: EUR 10,000 – EUR 20,000,000
  • 2 of 2 <nav> elements are unlabeled
    EAA: EUR 1,000 – EUR 500,000
  • Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)
    EAA: EUR 1,000 – EUR 500,000
  • No H1 heading found
    EAA: EUR 1,000 – EUR 500,000

Bounce-Rate Cost

€2,469 /mo

+26.0pp bounce · ~2,598 lost visitors/mo

CPC: EUR 0.95

Bandwidth Waste

€1.03 /mo

13915.7 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~1.4 MB per page load
    Saves €1.03/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

58
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
100
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

2.81 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

11.07 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

430 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.020

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

3.89 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

12.36 s

Desktop

87
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
100
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

671 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

2.23 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

1.41 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

2.25 s

Categories

8
Avg score 82.1

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Cart Functionality · 535 peers
You 81
·
Avg 73
+8 above average
0 50 100
Accessibility P98Security P96Compliance P13Sustainability P74Performance P69Content P65SEO P48Infrastructure P49

Top 10% of Cart Functionality sites score 86+ on Compliance; you're at 72 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 94% of Cart Functionality sites See full Cart Functionality benchmark →
Apple · 1257 peers
You 81
·
Avg 73
+8 above average
0 50 100
Accessibility P99Security P95Compliance P14Sustainability P74Content P72Performance P70SEO P62Infrastructure P51

Top 10% of Apple sites score 85+ on Compliance; you're at 72 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 97% of Apple sites See full Apple benchmark →

Technology stack

Apple, on JSS

18 technologies detected 4 stack layers 2 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Analytics
ABLyft BugSnag Dynatrace Google Tag Manager PayPal
Ecommerce
Cart Functionality
Framework
Apple DHL Foundation Google Play app Google Search Console Microsoft Native app preferred Open Graph React 18.3.1 Stencil Usercentrics
Runtime
JSS

All Detected Technologies (18)

JSS is an authoring tool for CSS which allows you to use JavaScript to describe styles in a declarative, conflict-free and reusable way.

Categories JavaScript frameworks, Development Website https://cssinjs.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Websites that have a shopping cart or checkout page, either using a known ecommerce platform or a custom solution.

Categories Ecommerce Website https://www.wappalyzer.com/technologies/ecommerce/cart-functionality Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Low Evidence TXT record: apple-domain-verification=Zn0wjdX_iPjv9CmH2E6E74WldzYBiwz7q5usMbaqV7Q

DHL is an international courier, package delivery and express mail service, which is a division of the German logistics firm Deutsche Post.

Categories Shipping carriers Website https://www.dhl.com Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Framework Website https://get.foundation Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Found 4 Foundation class patterns in HTML
Categories Other Detected by BeaverCheck · Low Evidence Manifest related_applications includes Google Play app
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=O6IN1i_8Wnc13XhQYAutvHAysMGODoqD2of2itZLjlA
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Low Evidence TXT record: MS=ms69565756
Categories Other Detected by BeaverCheck · Low Evidence Manifest prefer_related_applications is true

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

React is an open-source JavaScript library for building user interfaces or UI components.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://reactjs.org Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Stenciljs is an open-source web component compiler that enables developers to create reusable, interoperable UI components that can work across different frameworks and platforms.

Categories Web frameworks Website https://stenciljs.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Usercentrics is a SaaS enterprise solution for Consent Management (CMP) that helps enterprise customers to obtain, manage and document the user consent.

Categories Cookie compliance Website https://usercentrics.com Detected by BeaverCheck

ABlyft is an A/B-Testing Platform made for developers.

Categories A/B Testing Website https://ablyft.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Bugsnag is a cross-platform error monitoring, reporting, and resolution software.

Categories Analytics, Issue trackers Website https://bugsnag.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Dynatrace is a technology company that produces a software intelligence platform based on artificial intelligence to monitor and optimise application performance and development, IT infrastructure, and user experience for businesses and government agencies throughout the world.

Categories Analytics Website https://www.dynatrace.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Tag Manager is a tag management system (TMS) that allows you to quickly and easily update measurement codes and related code fragments collectively known as tags on your website or mobile app.

Categories Tag managers Website https://www.google.com/tagmanager Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL contains www.googletagmanager.com: https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtm.js?id=GTM-TZJ6LM&gtm=4e6562

PayPal is an online payments system that supports online money transfers and serves as an electronic alternative to traditional paper methods like checks and money orders.

Categories Payment processors Website https://paypal.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Observations (2)

No build tool detected

A framework (Apple) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

18 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fhornbach.de)](https://beavercheck.com/results/aaabdeec-edbe-4d73-b3fd-c3a1b484b050)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/aaabdeec-edbe-4d73-b3fd-c3a1b484b050"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fhornbach.de" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fhornbach.de

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 7h total → projected A (90)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+7

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

3 findings 1h → B (88)
  • · Page weighs 7.8 MB (4.4 MB transferred)
  • · HSTS header is missing
  • · 1 link(s) with no accessible text

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+2

Medium effort, high structural impact

2 findings 6h → A (90)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found

Send Feedback