Skip to content
Recent Trends
Performance improving ↑
88
TTFB improving ↑
134ms
FCP improving ↑
2.2s
LCP improving ↑
3.1s
Scanned
2026-04-04 16:43 UTC
Worker
🇺🇸 Santa Clara
Duration
1.1m
Vs prev

Audit overview

Accessibility needs attention; the rest of the categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

2

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

3

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

'unsafe-eval' found in script source

Unsafe value (unsafe-inline, unsafe-eval) in script-src defeats CSP's main protection — XSS injections can execute again.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 2

'unsafe-inline' found in script source

Unsafe value (unsafe-inline, unsafe-eval) in script-src defeats CSP's main protection — XSS injections can execute again.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 3

6 image-only link(s) without alt text

Image-only links with no alt are unidentifiable to screen-reader users — link's destination is invisible.

Accessibility › Link & Button Quality
Warning: 4

Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing

COEP enforces that all embedded resources opt-in to cross-origin embedding — required for cross-origin isolation features.

Security › Security Headers
Warning: 5

Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy header is missing

COOP isolates your top-level browsing context from cross-origin windows — without it, popup-based side-channel attacks remain possible.

Security › Security Headers
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
4 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
1 accessibility issue excludes users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

€1,169 investment → €7,586/month returns + EUR 20,500,000 risk avoided

Investment
€1.169
13.8 h · 5 findings
Monthly returns
€7.586
€91.030/yr
Payback
0.2 mo
+7689% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided EUR 20.500.000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
€1.0630.1 mo payback · +8468% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
€64 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

4 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~22%.

Barriers
4
1 crit 3 warn
Bounce delta
+22pp
added vs baseline
Score
81
B
Speed
2
Trust
1
Usability
0
Content
1
Nav
0
  • Page takes 4.8s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 2.3s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • High main-thread blocking time
    Page is non-interactive for 497ms after first paint
    → Defer third-party scripts and split large bundles
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • No structured data
    No rich-result eligibility in Google — lower SERP CTR vs competitors with stars and prices
    → Add JSON-LD for your page type (Product, Article, FAQPage, LocalBusiness, …)

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

€1,169 13.8 developer hours at €85/hr
Quick wins
€64 2 fixes in ~45 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

/hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

€4.759 / month at risk ~€57.104 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

€20.500.000

GDPREAA
  • No privacy policy link detected
    GDPR: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000
  • Multiple <main> landmarks (2 found)
    EAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000
  • 6 image-only link(s) without alt text
    EAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000

Bounce-Rate Cost

€4.758 /mo

+21.6pp bounce · ~2,163 lost visitors/mo

CPC: EUR 2.20

Bandwidth Waste

€0,24 /mo

3174.5 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~317 KB per page load
    Saves €0,24/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 3 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

69
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
100
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.53 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

4.83 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

497 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

3.24 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

4.91 s

Desktop

99
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
96
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
92
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

385 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

745 ms

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

85 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

656 ms

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

1.07 s

Categories

8
Avg score 84.0

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Algolia · 46 peers
You 83
·
Avg 74
+9 above average
0 50 100
Better than 97% of Algolia sites See full Algolia benchmark →
Google Search Console · 3872 peers
You 83
·
Avg 73
+10 above average
0 50 100
Security P94Compliance P92Sustainability P90Performance P83Accessibility P76Infrastructure P62SEO P40Content P47

Top 10% of Google Search Console sites score 96+ on SEO; you're at 89 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 95% of Google Search Console sites See full Google Search Console benchmark →

Technology stack

Algolia, on Turbopack, hosted on Next.js, with Vercel Edge CDN

14 technologies detected 4 stack layers 2 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Framework
Algolia Google Search Console Google Workspace HSTS Open Graph Priority Hints React Tailwind CSS Webpack
Runtime
Turbopack
CDN
Vercel Edge
Hosting
Next.js 16.2.1-canary.17 Next.js App Router Vercel

All Detected Technologies (14)

Categories CDN Website https://vercel.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence x-vercel-id: sfo1::pdx1::ltzdr-1775320973134-f3bdad301a15

Next.js is a React framework for developing single page Javascript applications.

Categories JavaScript frameworks, Web frameworks, Web servers, Static site generator Website https://nextjs.org Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL: https://nextjs.org/_next/static/chunks/3fa_wwjk-ynxw.js?dpl=dpl_76REKkd1QYthvffCGiAYfiJAQnff
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

The Next.js App Router is a new paradigm for building applications using React's latest features.

Categories JavaScript frameworks, Web servers Website https://nextjs.org/docs/app Detected by BeaverCheck

Vercel is a cloud platform for static frontends and serverless functions.

Categories PaaS Website https://vercel.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Header: x-vercel-id, Server: Vercel

Turbopack is an incremental bundler for JavaScript and TypeScript, written in Rust and integrated into the Next.js framework for optimized build performance.

Categories Development Website https://nextjs.org/docs/app/api-reference/turbopack Detected by BeaverCheck

Algolia offers a hosted web search product delivering real-time results.

Categories Search engines Website https://www.algolia.com Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=BsXDDAvxM3KYqCMD-vaPIxduP9YLqllhaBlERyhjsgw
Categories Email Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence MX record: aspmx.l.google.com

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

Priority Hints exposes a mechanism for developers to signal a relative priority for browsers to consider when fetching resources.

Categories Performance Website https://wicg.github.io/priority-hints/ Detected by BeaverCheck

React is an open-source JavaScript library for building user interfaces or UI components.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://reactjs.org Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →
Categories Framework Website https://tailwindcss.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Found 52 unique Tailwind utility classes in HTML

Webpack is an open-source JavaScript module bundler.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://webpack.js.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (2)

No build tool detected

A framework (Algolia) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

14 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fnextjs.org)](https://beavercheck.com/results/ab209dee-70ec-4ca1-aa3e-e312322da4cf)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/ab209dee-70ec-4ca1-aa3e-e312322da4cf"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fnextjs.org" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fnextjs.org

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

3 sprints · 14h total → projected B (89)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+2

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

2 findings 1h → B (85)
  • · 6 image-only link(s) without alt text
  • · Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy header is missing

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+1

Medium effort, high structural impact

1 findings 1h → B (86)
  • · Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing

Sprint 3: Strategic Improvements

+3

Higher effort, long-term payoff

2 findings 12h → B (89)
  • · 'unsafe-eval' found in script source
  • · 'unsafe-inline' found in script source

Send Feedback