Skip to content
Scanned
2026-05-10 11:06 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
36.00s
Vs prev

Global Performance

6/6 locations

Excellent global latency — average 96ms across 6 locations, fastest from Sao Paulo (71ms), slowest from Madrid (135ms). Cloudflare edge cache (DYNAMIC).

Spain - Madrid
Full audit
135ms
DNS 39ms · TLS 23ms
United Stated - New York
81ms
DNS 9ms · TLS 7ms
Singapore - Singapore
120ms
DNS 11ms · TLS 8ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
71ms
DNS 11ms · TLS 8ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
97ms
DNS 11ms · TLS 11ms
United States - Santa Clara
75ms
DNS 13ms · TLS 8ms
CDN: Cloudflare (DYNAMIC) · Avg TTFB: 96ms · Cache: public, max-age=0, must-revalidate

Audit overview

Compliance needs attention; the rest of the categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

3

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

2

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 3

1 link(s) with no accessible text

Links with no accessible text (empty <a></a>, image-only no alt, icon-only no aria-label) are unidentifiable to screen readers.

Accessibility › Link & Button Quality
Critical: 4

2 button(s) with no accessible text

Buttons with no accessible text (icon-only, no aria-label) can't be activated by voice control or understood by screen readers.

Accessibility › Link & Button Quality
Critical: 5

No <main> landmark found

Without a <main> landmark, screen-reader users can't skip past the navigation to the page content — every page starts with re-reading the menu.

Accessibility › Landmark Structure
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
2 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
3 accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

$717 investment → $4,232/month returns + USD 157,500 risk avoided

Investment
$717
7.2 h · 5 findings
Monthly returns
$4,232
$50,782/yr
Payback
0.2 mo
+6986% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided USD 157,500
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
$6500.2 mo payback · +7713% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
$117 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

6 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~16%.

Barriers
6
6 warn
Bounce delta
+16pp
added vs baseline
Score
82
B
Speed
0
Trust
2
Usability
0
Content
2
Nav
2
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • No structured data
    No rich-result eligibility in Google — lower SERP CTR vs competitors with stars and prices
    → Add JSON-LD for your page type (Product, Article, FAQPage, LocalBusiness, …)
  • Thin content
    Under 300 words — visitors bounce looking for substance, search engines rank competitors first
    → Add a substantive FAQ, product detail, or case-study section
  • No skip-to-content link
    Keyboard and screen-reader users must tab through the entire header on every page
    → Add a visible-on-focus <a href="#main">Skip to content</a> as the first focusable element

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

$717 7.2 developer hours at $100/hr
Quick wins
$117 3 fixes in ~70 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

$ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Cost of inaction

$17,357 / month at risk ~$208,282 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

$157,500

ADA Title IIICCPA/CPRA
  • No privacy policy link detected
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • Trackers detected but no cookie policy found
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • Trackers detected but no privacy policy found
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • Privacy Policy not detected
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • No <main> landmark found
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
  • No <nav> landmark found
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
  • Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
  • No headings found
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000

Bounce-Rate Cost

$4,232 /mo

+15.7pp bounce · ~1,573 lost visitors/mo

CPC: USD 2.69

Bandwidth Waste

$0.24 /mo

2947.0 MB/mo × 0.080 USD/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~295 KB per page load
    Saves $0.24/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

0
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
84
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

6.27 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

0 ms

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

6.33 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

0 ms

Desktop

88
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
87
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

968 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

1.81 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

135 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

1.23 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

1.86 s

Categories

8
Avg score 81.6

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Google Font API · 1000 peers
You 81
·
Avg 73
+8 above average
0 50 100
Compliance P2Accessibility P96Sustainability P95Performance P93Security P93SEO P8Content P30Infrastructure P35

Top 10% of Google Font API sites score 86+ on Compliance; you're at 63 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 95% of Google Font API sites See full Google Font API benchmark →
HSTS · 2430 peers
You 81
·
Avg 75
+6 above average
0 50 100
Compliance P3Accessibility P93Sustainability P93Performance P86Security P83SEO P27Infrastructure P31Content P41

Top 10% of HSTS sites score 86+ on Compliance; you're at 63 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 89% of HSTS sites See full HSTS benchmark →

Technology stack

Google Font API, on Emotion, hosted on Vercel, with Cloudflare CDN

14 technologies detected 6 stack layers 2 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Analytics
Google Analytics Google Tag Manager
Build
Webpack
Framework
Google Font API HSTS HTTP/3 MUI Material UI Material-UI Open Graph React
Runtime
Emotion
CDN
Cloudflare
Hosting
Vercel

All Detected Technologies (14)

Cloudflare is a web-infrastructure and website-security company, providing content-delivery-network services, DDoS mitigation, Internet security, and distributed domain-name-server services.

Categories CDN Website https://www.cloudflare.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header in redirect: cloudflare
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Vercel is a cloud platform for static frontends and serverless functions.

Categories PaaS Website https://vercel.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Header: x-vercel-id

Emotion is a library designed for writing CSS styles with JavaScript.

Categories JavaScript frameworks, Development Website https://emotion.sh Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Font API is a web service that supports open-source font files that can be used on your web designs.

Categories Font scripts Website https://fonts.google.com/ Detected by BeaverCheck

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

HTTP/3 is the third major version of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol used to exchange information on the World Wide Web.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://httpwg.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck

MUI(formerly Material UI) is a simple and customisable component library to build faster, beautiful, and more accessible React applications.

Categories UI frameworks Website https://mui.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Material UI is a simple and customisable component library to build faster, beautiful, and more accessible React applications.

Categories UI frameworks Website https://mui.com Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Framework Website https://mui.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Found 67 MUI class names (e.g. MuiButton) in HTML

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

React is an open-source JavaScript library for building user interfaces or UI components.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://reactjs.org Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Google Analytics is a free web analytics service that tracks and reports website traffic.

Categories Analytics Website https://google.com/analytics Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Tag Manager is a tag management system (TMS) that allows you to quickly and easily update measurement codes and related code fragments collectively known as tags on your website or mobile app.

Categories Tag managers Website https://www.google.com/tagmanager Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL contains www.googletagmanager.com: https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-W4J4LY449S
Categories Build Tool Website https://webpack.js.org Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence Chunk pattern: https://Dylankotzer.com/static/js/main.f9e0e4ec.js

Observations (1)

Complex technology stack detected

14 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2FDylankotzer.com)](https://beavercheck.com/results/ab64fe80-7dd1-43f5-ab60-bb3bf7dbb7f4)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/ab64fe80-7dd1-43f5-ab60-bb3bf7dbb7f4"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2FDylankotzer.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2FDylankotzer.com

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 7h total → projected A (90)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+4

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

3 findings 1h → B (85)
  • · No <main> landmark found
  • · 1 link(s) with no accessible text
  • · 2 button(s) with no accessible text

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+5

Medium effort, high structural impact

2 findings 6h → A (90)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found

Send Feedback