Audit overview
All categories sit comfortably above the 70 threshold; this is a clean audit.
Fix Priority Matrix
5 findingsQuick Wins
3High impact, low effort — start here.
Strategic
2High impact, requires investment.
Easy Improvements
0Small gains, minimal effort.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Deprioritize
0Low impact, high effort — do last.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Screenshots
Top Priorities (5)
'unsafe-inline' found in script source
Unsafe value (unsafe-inline, unsafe-eval) in script-src defeats CSP's main protection — XSS injections can execute again.
44 third-party resources (100% of weight)
Informational: third-party resource count and their share of page weight. High share caps perf gains from frontend optimization.
Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing
COEP enforces that all embedded resources opt-in to cross-origin embedding — required for cross-origin isolation features.
External link from cdn.joomla.org lacks integrity attribute
External resource without SRI — if the third-party CDN is compromised, your site executes attacker-controlled code.
External link from fonts.googleapis.com lacks integrity attribute
External resource without SRI — if the third-party CDN is compromised, your site executes attacker-controlled code.
Business case
What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.
Return on investment
£600 investment → £5,327/month returns + GBP 18,050,000 risk avoided
Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.
Conversion barriers
5 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~19%.
- 5 broken link(s) on the pageClicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends→ Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab
- Page loads in 3.7sEvery additional 100ms above 2.5s costs conversions — you're 1.2s over→ Target <2.5s LCP: defer non-critical scripts and optimize the hero image
- No Content-Security-Policy headerHigher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form→ Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
- No structured dataNo rich-result eligibility in Google — lower SERP CTR vs competitors with stars and prices→ Add JSON-LD for your page type (Product, Article, FAQPage, LocalBusiness, …)
- No skip-to-content linkKeyboard and screen-reader users must tab through the entire header on every page→ Add a visible-on-focus <a href="#main">Skip to content</a> as the first focusable element
Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.
Remediation cost
Start here for the best return on investment
Cost by category
Cost by effort level
Adjust assumptions
Team composition
Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.
Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead
Warning:Cost of inaction
Compliance Risk
£18,050,000
- No privacy policy link detectedUK GDPR: GBP 10,000 – GBP 17,500,000
- Trackers detected but no cookie policy foundUK GDPR: GBP 10,000 – GBP 17,500,000
- Trackers detected but no cookie policy foundPECR: GBP 1,000 – GBP 500,000
Bounce-Rate Cost
£3,916 /mo
+18.6pp bounce · ~1,865 lost visitors/mo
CPC: GBP 2.10
Bandwidth Waste
£0.17 /mo
2657.9 MB/mo × 0.063 GBP/GB
- Optimize transfer: save ~266 KB per page loadSaves £0.17/mo
Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.
Unique monthly visitors from your analytics
Purchases, signups, or key actions
Optional — for revenue estimation
more engaged visitors from reduced bounce
Fix 1 critical issues to capture this value
How this is calculated
Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.
Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.
These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary
Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers
Lighthouse
Mobile
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
2.79 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
3.69 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
106 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.000
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
3.37 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
7.29 s
Desktop
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
1.14 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
2.14 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
0 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.000
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
1.52 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
2.15 s
Categories
8Performance
44 third-party resources (100% of weight)
Security
'unsafe-inline' found in script source
Accessibility
All checks pass
SEO
All checks pass
Infrastructure
All checks pass
Compliance
All checks pass
Content
All checks pass
Sustainability
All checks pass
How you compare
Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.
Technology stack
Joomla, on LiteSpeed/PHP, with Cloudflare CDN
Stack Architecture
Google Analytics 
Google Tag Manager 
Pingdom RUM 
Joomla 
Bootstrap 
Google Font API Google Search Console Google Workspace HSTS 
Open Graph 
Tailwind CSS 
YouTube 
hCaptcha 
PHP 
LiteSpeed 
Cloudflare All Detected Technologies (17)
Cloudflare is a web-infrastructure and website-security company, providing content-delivery-network services, DDoS mitigation, Internet security, and distributed domain-name-server services.
LiteSpeed is a high-scalability web server.
PHP is a general-purpose scripting language used for web development.
Joomla is a free and open-source content management system for publishing web content.
Awesomplete is a tool in the Javascript UI Libraries category of a tech stack.
Bootstrap is a free and open-source CSS framework directed at responsive, mobile-first front-end web development. It contains CSS and JavaScript-based design templates for typography, forms, buttons, navigation, and other interface components.
Google Font API is a web service that supports open-source font files that can be used on your web designs.
HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.
Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.
YouTube is a video sharing service where users can create their own profile, upload videos, watch, like and comment on other videos.
hCaptcha is an anti-bot solution that protects user privacy and rewards websites.
Google Analytics is a free web analytics service that tracks and reports website traffic.
Google Tag Manager is a tag management system (TMS) that allows you to quickly and easily update measurement codes and related code fragments collectively known as tags on your website or mobile app.
Pingdom RUM(Real User Monitoring) is a feature of the Pingdom website monitoring and performance testing service. RUM enables you to collect and analyse data on how real users are experiencing your website.
Observations (2)
No build tool detected
A framework (Awesomplete) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.
Complex technology stack detected
17 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.
Show your score
Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.
This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.
[](https://beavercheck.com/results/abb887bf-90bd-431c-bccd-d8009f16acea)<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/abb887bf-90bd-431c-bccd-d8009f16acea"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fjoomla.org" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fjoomla.orgExport & share
Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.
Copies markdown to clipboard
Fix Plan
Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.
Three-week fix plan
3 sprints · 8h total → projected B (88)
Sprint 1: Quick Wins
+3Highest ROI — low effort, high impact
- · 44 third-party resources (100% of weight)
- · External link from cdn.joomla.org lacks integrity attribute
- · External link from fonts.googleapis.com lacks integrity attribute
Sprint 2: Core Fixes
Medium effort, high structural impact
- · Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing
Sprint 3: Strategic Improvements
+2Higher effort, long-term payoff
- · 'unsafe-inline' found in script source