Global Performance
6/6 locations ✓Strong global performance — average 197ms across 6 locations, fastest from Amsterdam (83ms), slowest from Sao Paulo (290ms). Cloudflare Pages in front.
Audit overview
All categories sit comfortably above the 70 threshold; this is a clean audit.
Fix Priority Matrix
5 findingsQuick Wins
2High impact, low effort — start here.
Strategic
3High impact, requires investment.
Easy Improvements
0Small gains, minimal effort.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Deprioritize
0Low impact, high effort — do last.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Screenshots
Your mail setup has problems.
racing-hub.pages.dev fails 2 mail checks: No DMARC record found, No SPF record found. This is the kind of misconfiguration that sends your mail to spam.
Top Priorities (5)
11 inline style attribute(s) detected
Inline style attributes force `style-src 'unsafe-inline'` in any CSP -- effectively negating CSP's XSS-mitigation value for stylesheets.
15 render-blocking stylesheet(s) -- recommended: <=3
Informational: a Permissions-Policy directive showing feature -> allowed origins.
Compressed response missing `Vary` header
Performance issues directly impact user engagement and conversion rates.
Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing
COEP enforces that all embedded resources opt-in to cross-origin embedding — required for cross-origin isolation features.
External link from fonts.googleapis.com lacks integrity attribute
External resource without SRI — if the third-party CDN is compromised, your site executes attacker-controlled code.
Business case
What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.
Return on investment
$750 investment → $7,794/month returns + USD 150,000 risk avoided
Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.
Conversion barriers
4 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~28%.
- Page takes 10.9s to loadUsers abandon at ~3s — you're 8.4s over the 2.5s threshold→ Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
- Severe layout shift during page loadUsers mis-click when content jumps — converting intent into frustration→ Reserve space for images, ads, and embeds with explicit width/height
- 3 broken link(s) on the pageClicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends→ Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab
- No skip-to-content linkKeyboard and screen-reader users must tab through the entire header on every page→ Add a visible-on-focus <a href="#main">Skip to content</a> as the first focusable element
Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.
Remediation cost
Start here for the best return on investment
Cost by category
Cost by effort level
Adjust assumptions
Team composition
Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.
Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead
Warning:Cost of inaction
Compliance Risk
$150,000
- Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
- 3 heading(s) are over 120 characters -- likely a misformatted paragraphADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
Bounce-Rate Cost
$7,407 /mo
+27.5pp bounce · ~2,753 lost visitors/mo
CPC: USD 2.69
Bandwidth Waste
$0.40 /mo
5060.8 MB/mo × 0.080 USD/GB
- Optimize transfer: save ~506 KB per page loadSaves $0.40/mo
Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.
Unique monthly visitors from your analytics
Purchases, signups, or key actions
Optional — for revenue estimation
more engaged visitors from reduced bounce
How this is calculated
Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.
Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.
These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary
Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers
Lighthouse
Mobile
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
1.28 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
10.90 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
19 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.288
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
3.16 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
10.92 s
Desktop
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
1.09 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
2.15 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
0 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.146
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
1.09 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
2.15 s
Categories
8Performance
15 render-blocking stylesheet(s) -- recommended: <=3
Security
11 inline style attribute(s) detected
Accessibility
All checks pass
SEO
All checks pass
Infrastructure
All checks pass
Compliance
All checks pass
Content
All checks pass
Sustainability
All checks pass
How you compare
Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.
Top 10% of Font Awesome sites score 85+ on Compliance; you're at 71 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.
Top 10% of Google Font API sites score 85+ on Compliance; you're at 71 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.
Technology stack
Font Awesome, on Supabase, with Cloudflare CDN
Stack Architecture
Font Awesome 
Google Font API HSTS 
HTTP/3 
Open Graph 
PWA 
PostgreSQL 
Priority Hints 
Supabase 
Cloudflare 
jsDelivr jsDelivr CDN All Detected Technologies (12)
Cloudflare is a web-infrastructure and website-security company, providing content-delivery-network services, DDoS mitigation, Internet security, and distributed domain-name-server services.
JSDelivr is a free public CDN for open-source projects. It can serve web files directly from the npm registry and GitHub repositories without any configuration.
Supabase is an open-source platform that offers a Postgres database, Authentication, APIs, Edge Functions, Realtime subscriptions, Storage, and Vector embeddings for project development.
Font Awesome is a font and icon toolkit based on CSS and Less.
Google Font API is a web service that supports open-source font files that can be used on your web designs.
HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.
HTTP/3 is the third major version of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol used to exchange information on the World Wide Web.
Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.
Progressive Web Apps (PWAs) are web apps built and enhanced with modern APIs to deliver enhanced capabilities, reliability, and installability while reaching anyone, anywhere, on any device, all with a single codebase.
PostgreSQL, also known as Postgres, is a free and open-source relational database management system emphasizing extensibility and SQL compliance.
Priority Hints exposes a mechanism for developers to signal a relative priority for browsers to consider when fetching resources.
Observations (2)
No build tool detected
A framework (Font Awesome) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.
Complex technology stack detected
12 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.
Show your score
Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.
This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.
[](https://beavercheck.com/sites/racing-hub.pages.dev)<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/racing-hub.pages.dev"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fracing-hub.pages.dev" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fracing-hub.pages.devExport & share
Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.
Copies markdown to clipboard
Fix Plan
Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.
Three-week fix plan
2 sprints · 8h total → projected A (94)
Sprint 1: Quick Wins
+2Highest ROI — low effort, high impact
- · 15 render-blocking stylesheet(s) -- recommended: <=3
- · External link from fonts.googleapis.com lacks integrity attribute
Sprint 2: Core Fixes
+3Medium effort, high structural impact
- · Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing
- · Compressed response missing `Vary` header
- · 11 inline style attribute(s) detected