Skip to content
Scanned
2026-04-22 00:07 UTC
Worker
🇺🇸 New York
Duration
1.5m
Vs prev

Audit overview

4 categories need attention: Security, and 3 others.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

3

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

2

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

HSTS header is missing

Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 3

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Warning: 4

13 third-party resources (40% of weight)

Informational: third-party resource count and their share of page weight. High share caps perf gains from frontend optimization.

Performance › Page Weight Inventory
Warning: 5

Certificate expires soon (26 days remaining)

Cert expiry within the renewal window — fix now while there's no user impact, instead of after expiry when there's a full outage.

Security › TLS & Certificates
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Your LCP of 8.5s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 1 performance issue below directly contributes to it. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
4 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
Your LCP is 8.5s — fixing the 1 performance critical could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

₽23,625 investment → ₽287,150/month returns

Investment
₽23 625
6.8 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
₽287 150
₽3 445 799/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+14485% Y1
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
₽21 8750.1 mo payback · +15652% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
₽2 625 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

7 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~25%.

Barriers
7
1 crit 6 warn
Bounce delta
+25pp
added vs baseline
Score
72
B
Speed
1
Trust
2
Usability
1
Content
2
Nav
1
  • Page takes 8.5s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 6.0s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • Viewport disables user zoom
    Visitors with low vision can't read the page — and some jurisdictions treat this as a legal risk
    → Remove user-scalable=no; drop maximum-scale if it's below 2
  • No Open Graph tags
    Links shared on LinkedIn / Slack / Facebook show bare URLs — referral clicks drop
    → Add og:title, og:description, og:image, og:url to the page head

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

₽23,625 6.8 developer hours at ₽3500/hr
Quick wins
₽2,625 2 fixes in ~45 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

/hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

₽151 048 / month at risk ~₽1 812 579 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Bounce-Rate Cost

₽151 024 /mo

+25.2pp bounce · ~2,517 lost visitors/mo

CPC: RUB 60.00

Bandwidth Waste

₽24 /mo

3272.7 MB/mo × 7.273 RUB/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~327 KB per page load
    Saves ₽24/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 3 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

59
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
83
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

5.43 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

8.53 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

80 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

6.59 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

8.58 s

Desktop

77
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
83
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.53 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

2.94 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

1.53 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

2.94 s

Categories

8
Avg score 76.4

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Bootstrap · 923 peers
You 75
·
Avg 74
At average
0 50 100
Compliance P5Performance P90Content P17SEO P21Security P24Sustainability P74Infrastructure P72Accessibility P43

Top 10% of Bootstrap sites score 86+ on Compliance; you're at 69 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 59% of Bootstrap sites See full Bootstrap benchmark →
Bulma · 379 peers
You 75
·
Avg 74
At average
0 50 100
Compliance P4Performance P95Content P8SEO P11Security P21Sustainability P79Infrastructure P66Accessibility P39

Top 10% of Bulma sites score 85+ on Compliance; you're at 69 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 53% of Bulma sites See full Bulma benchmark →

Technology stack

Bootstrap, with Nginx CDN

10 technologies detected 2 stack layers 1 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Framework
Bootstrap Bulma Cloudflare Font Awesome Google Search Console Hammer.js 2.0.8 Open Graph Vue.js
CDN
Nginx jsDelivr CDN

All Detected Technologies (10)

Nginx is a web server that can also be used as a reverse proxy, load balancer, mail proxy and HTTP cache.

Categories Web servers, Reverse proxies Website https://nginx.org/en Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header: nginx
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →
Categories CDN Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence Script URL contains cdn.jsdelivr.net: https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/yandex-metrica-watch/watch.js
Categories Framework Website https://getbootstrap.com Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence Found 3 Bootstrap class patterns in HTML
Categories Framework Website https://bulma.io Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Found 39 Bulma class patterns in HTML
Categories DNS Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence NS record: aspen.ns.cloudflare.com

Font Awesome is a font and icon toolkit based on CSS and Less.

Categories Font scripts Website https://fontawesome.com/ Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=65sEnIGIq_2g-nyyL2v00ohczY8W8dnxYl08mDLYhZI

Hammer.js is a JavaScript library for adding touch gestures like swipe, pinch, and rotate to web applications.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://hammerjs.github.io Detected by BeaverCheck

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

Vue.js is an open-source model–view–viewmodel JavaScript framework for building user interfaces and single-page applications.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://vuejs.org Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (2)

No build tool detected

A framework (Bootstrap) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

10 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftaplink.cc)](https://beavercheck.com/sites/taplink.cc)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/taplink.cc"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftaplink.cc" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftaplink.cc

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 7h total → projected B (83)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+5

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

3 findings 1h → B (80)
  • · HSTS header is missing
  • · 13 third-party resources (40% of weight)
  • · Certificate expires soon (26 days remaining)

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+3

Medium effort, high structural impact

2 findings 6h → B (83)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found

Send Feedback