Skip to content
Scanned
2026-04-22 22:13 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
2.9m
Vs prev

Audit overview

4 categories need attention: Accessibility, and 3 others.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

3

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

2

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 3

Page weighs 7.9 MB (4.9 MB transferred)

Informational: total page weight (uncompressed) and bytes actually transferred over the wire.

Performance › Page Weight Budget
Critical: 4

No <main> landmark found

Without a <main> landmark, screen-reader users can't skip past the navigation to the page content — every page starts with re-reading the menu.

Accessibility › Landmark Structure
Critical: 5

No favicon or icon links detected

Without a favicon, your tab shows a blank icon and bookmarks look unbranded — amateur signal in every browser surface.

Accessibility › Favicon & Branding
What fixing these means. Your site has several issues that may be affecting user experience and business outcomes. Your LCP of 14.3s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 1 performance issue below directly contributes to it. Accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology — an estimated 15% of your potential audience. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
2 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
Your LCP is 14.3s — fixing the 1 performance critical could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.
2 accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

£500 investment → £8,300/month returns + GBP 18,050,000 risk avoided

Investment
£500
6.7 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
£8,300
£99,605/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+19821% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided GBP 18,050,000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
£4630.1 mo payback · +21436% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
£50 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

10 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~37%.

Barriers
10
2 crit 8 warn
Bounce delta
+37pp
added vs baseline
Score
56
C
Speed
2
Trust
2
Usability
1
Content
4
Nav
1
  • Page takes 14.3s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 11.8s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • No viewport meta tag
    Mobile browsers render at desktop width and shrink — text unreadable, tap targets miniature
    → Add <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1">
  • High main-thread blocking time
    Page is non-interactive for 270ms after first paint
    → Defer third-party scripts and split large bundles
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

£500 6.7 developer hours at £75/hr
Quick wins
£50 2 fixes in ~40 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

£ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

£7,824 / month at risk ~£93,887 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

£18,050,000

UK GDPRPECREquality Act 2010
  • No privacy policy link detected
    UK GDPR: GBP 10,000 – GBP 17,500,000
  • Trackers detected but no cookie policy found
    UK GDPR: GBP 10,000 – GBP 17,500,000
  • Trackers detected but no cookie policy found
    PECR: GBP 1,000 – GBP 500,000

Bounce-Rate Cost

£7,823 /mo

+37.3pp bounce · ~3,725 lost visitors/mo

CPC: GBP 2.10

Bandwidth Waste

£0.97 /mo

15365.2 MB/mo × 0.063 GBP/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~1.5 MB per page load
    Saves £0.97/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Categories

8
Avg score 68.9

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Google Search Console · 3886 peers
You 69
·
Avg 73
At average
0 50 100
Compliance P4Content P10Accessibility P11SEO P11Infrastructure P18Security P77Sustainability P29Performance P35

Top 10% of Google Search Console sites score 85+ on Compliance; you're at 66 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 7% of Google Search Console sites See full Google Search Console benchmark →
HSTS · 2614 peers
You 69
·
Avg 75
-6 below average
0 50 100
SEO P8Compliance P8Accessibility P9Content P10Infrastructure P14Sustainability P23Performance P26Security P62

Top 10% of HSTS sites score 96+ on SEO; you're at 74 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 3% of HSTS sites See full HSTS benchmark →

Technology stack

Google Search Console

3 technologies detected 1 stack layers Standard

Stack Architecture

Framework
Google Search Console HSTS Proofpoint

All Detected Technologies (3)

Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=vPkZv7fjzUVwP2apQBxXmbtPQb0PAhU5k9KuxnAwr5o

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Email Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence MX record: mxb-00299f02.gslb.pphosted.com

Observations (1)

No build tool detected

A framework (Google Search Console) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fhsbc.com)](https://beavercheck.com/results/acbff685-3634-4fec-a6bc-c5f65f1788e5)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/acbff685-3634-4fec-a6bc-c5f65f1788e5"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fhsbc.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fhsbc.com

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 7h total → projected B (80)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+6

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

3 findings 1h → C (75)
  • · Page weighs 7.9 MB (4.9 MB transferred)
  • · No <main> landmark found
  • · No favicon or icon links detected

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+5

Medium effort, high structural impact

2 findings 6h → B (80)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found

Send Feedback