Skip to content
Scanned
2026-04-20 09:07 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
1.1m
Vs prev

Global Performance

6/6 locations

Acceptable global latency — average 491ms across 6 locations, fastest from New York (151ms), slowest from Singapore (938ms). Cloudflare edge cache (DYNAMIC). 3 locations above the 500ms target.

Spain - Madrid
Full audit
543ms
DNS 49ms · TLS 23ms
United Stated - New York
151ms
DNS 7ms · TLS 8ms
United States - Santa Clara
233ms
DNS 11ms · TLS 10ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
449ms
DNS 10ms · TLS 12ms
Singapore - Singapore
938ms
DNS 12ms · TLS 9ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
631ms
DNS 10ms · TLS 8ms
CDN: Cloudflare (DYNAMIC) · Avg TTFB: 491ms · Cache: no-cache, must-revalidate, max-age=0

Audit overview

Security and Accessibility need attention; the other categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

3

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

2

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

Cookie 'PHPSESSID' is missing the Secure flag

A cookie without the Secure flag can leak over HTTP — in HSTS-protected sites, this is still a defense-in-depth gap.

Security › Cookie Security
Critical: 3

HSTS header is missing

Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 4

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 5

Page weighs 7.8 MB (6.2 MB transferred)

Informational: total page weight (uncompressed) and bytes actually transferred over the wire.

Performance › Page Weight Budget
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Your LCP of 28.5s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 1 performance issue below directly contributes to it. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
4 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
Your LCP is 28.5s — fixing the 1 performance critical could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

€553 investment → €5,416/month returns + EUR 120,500,000 risk avoided

Investment
€553
6.5 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
€5.416
€64.995/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+11664% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided EUR 120.500.000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
€2980.1 mo payback · +21747% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
€43 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

6 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~25%.

Barriers
6
1 crit 5 warn
Bounce delta
+25pp
added vs baseline
Score
75
B
Speed
2
Trust
2
Usability
0
Content
0
Nav
2
  • Page takes 28.5s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 26.0s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • High main-thread blocking time
    Page is non-interactive for 466ms after first paint
    → Defer third-party scripts and split large bundles
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • No skip-to-content link
    Keyboard and screen-reader users must tab through the entire header on every page
    → Add a visible-on-focus <a href="#main">Skip to content</a> as the first focusable element

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

€553 6.5 developer hours at €85/hr
Quick wins
€43 2 fixes in ~30 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

/hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

€5.416 / month at risk ~€64.995 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

€120.500.000

ePrivacy DirectiveGDPREAA
  • No privacy policy link detected
    GDPR: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000
  • 1 advertising/retargeting trackers detected
    GDPR: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000
  • Trackers detected but no cookie policy found
    GDPR: EUR 5.000 – EUR 10.000.000

Bounce-Rate Cost

€5.415 /mo

+24.6pp bounce · ~2,461 lost visitors/mo

CPC: EUR 2.20

Bandwidth Waste

€1,44 /mo

19438.1 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~1.9 MB per page load
    Saves €1,44/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

47
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
77
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
77
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
77
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

3.59 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

28.54 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

466 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

13.65 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

28.56 s

Desktop

63
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
80
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
81
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
77
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.46 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

5.68 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

3.77 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

5.68 s

Categories

8
Avg score 76.5

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Google Font API · 1046 peers
You 72
·
Avg 73
At average
0 50 100
Infrastructure P1Content P92Security P14Compliance P32Accessibility P58SEO P58Performance P44Sustainability P56

Top 10% of Google Font API sites score 96+ on Infrastructure; you're at 75 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 26% of Google Font API sites See full Google Font API benchmark →
Google Search Console · 3886 peers
You 72
·
Avg 73
At average
0 50 100
Infrastructure P1Security P6Content P89SEO P67Compliance P38Accessibility P58Sustainability P56Performance P46

Top 10% of Google Search Console sites score 95+ on Infrastructure; you're at 75 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 30% of Google Search Console sites See full Google Search Console benchmark →

Technology stack

Google Font API, on PHP, with Cloudflare CDN

13 technologies detected 4 stack layers 4 with CPE identifier Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Analytics
Google Analytics Google Tag Manager theTradeDesk
Framework
Google Font API Google Search Console Google Workspace HTTP/3 Microsoft Open Graph jQuery 1.11.2 jQuery UI 1.10.4
Runtime
PHP
CDN
Cloudflare

All Detected Technologies (13)

Cloudflare is a web-infrastructure and website-security company, providing content-delivery-network services, DDoS mitigation, Internet security, and distributed domain-name-server services.

Categories CDN Website https://www.cloudflare.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header in redirect: cloudflare
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

PHP is a general-purpose scripting language used for web development.

Categories Programming languages Website https://php.net Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Google Font API is a web service that supports open-source font files that can be used on your web designs.

Categories Font scripts Website https://fonts.google.com/ Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=UtgdNhq7FFXwrddiF_bwIU_Nwy931srgmVmt4NcV6LY
Categories Email Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence TXT SPF record includes _spf.google.com: v=spf1 ip4:72.235.190.38 include:spf.senior-anywhere.com include:_spf.google.com -all

HTTP/3 is the third major version of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol used to exchange information on the World Wide Web.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://httpwg.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Low Evidence TXT record: MS=ms36431299

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

jQuery is a JavaScript library which is a free, open-source software designed to simplify HTML DOM tree traversal and manipulation, as well as event handling, CSS animation, and Ajax.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://jquery.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

jQuery UI is a collection of GUI widgets, animated visual effects, and themes implemented with jQuery, Cascading Style Sheets, and HTML.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://jqueryui.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Google Analytics is a free web analytics service that tracks and reports website traffic.

Categories Analytics Website https://google.com/analytics Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Tag Manager is a tag management system (TMS) that allows you to quickly and easily update measurement codes and related code fragments collectively known as tags on your website or mobile app.

Categories Tag managers Website https://www.google.com/tagmanager Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL contains www.googletagmanager.com: https://www.googletagmanager.com/gtag/js?id=G-YMFHVL5QGV&cx=c&gtm=4e64f1

theTradeDesk is an technology company that markets a software platform used by digital ad buyers to purchase data-driven digital advertising campaigns across various ad formats and devices.

Categories Advertising Website https://www.thetradedesk.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (3)

No build tool detected

A framework (Google Font API) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

jQuery version may be outdated

Detected jQuery 1.11.2. The current major version is 3. Consider updating for security patches and new features.

→ Security

Complex technology stack detected

13 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Flapietra.edu)](https://beavercheck.com/results/ad70d926-ac69-419b-9e4d-402540a318a4)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/ad70d926-ac69-419b-9e4d-402540a318a4"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Flapietra.edu" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Flapietra.edu

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 6h total → projected B (82)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+7

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

3 findings 0h → C (79)
  • · Page weighs 7.8 MB (6.2 MB transferred)
  • · Cookie 'PHPSESSID' is missing the Secure flag
  • · HSTS header is missing

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+3

Medium effort, high structural impact

2 findings 6h → B (82)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found

Send Feedback