Audit overview
Security and Sustainability need attention; the other categories are in good shape.
Fix Priority Matrix
5 findingsQuick Wins
3High impact, low effort — start here.
Strategic
2High impact, requires investment.
Easy Improvements
0Small gains, minimal effort.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Deprioritize
0Low impact, high effort — do last.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Screenshots
Top Priorities (5)
119 HTTP requests — consider bundling or reducing
High HTTP request count — bundling, sprite-ing, and HTTP/2 server push can reduce per-request overhead.
68 third-party resources (65% of weight)
Informational: third-party resource count and their share of page weight. High share caps perf gains from frontend optimization.
Cookie 'X-Mapping-faaonofk' has no SameSite attribute
Without SameSite, cookies ride along on cross-site requests — enabling CSRF attacks that SameSite=Lax blocks for free.
Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing
COEP enforces that all embedded resources opt-in to cross-origin embedding — required for cross-origin isolation features.
Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy header is missing
COOP isolates your top-level browsing context from cross-origin windows — without it, popup-based side-channel attacks remain possible.
Business case
What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.
Return on investment
$550 investment → $7,474/month returns + USD 157,500 risk avoided
Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.
Conversion barriers
6 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~28%.
- Page takes 19.3s to loadUsers abandon at ~3s — you're 16.8s over the 2.5s threshold→ Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
- Page feels frozen for 1.2sClicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs→ Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
- No HSTS headerReturning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request→ Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
- No Content-Security-Policy headerHigher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form→ Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
- Content is hard to readGraduate-level reading difficulty — limits the addressable audience for product or blog pages→ Shorten sentences; replace jargon with plain language; target Flesch ease ≥60
Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.
Remediation cost
Start here for the best return on investment
Cost by category
Cost by effort level
Adjust assumptions
Team composition
Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.
Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead
Warning:Cost of inaction
Compliance Risk
$157,500
- No privacy policy link detectedCCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
- 1 advertising/retargeting trackers detectedCCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
- Trackers detected but no cookie policy foundCCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
Bounce-Rate Cost
$7,473 /mo
+27.8pp bounce · ~2,778 lost visitors/mo
CPC: USD 2.69
Bandwidth Waste
$0.92 /mo
11505.9 MB/mo × 0.080 USD/GB
- Optimize transfer: save ~1.2 MB per page loadSaves $0.92/mo
Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.
Unique monthly visitors from your analytics
Purchases, signups, or key actions
Optional — for revenue estimation
more engaged visitors from reduced bounce
How this is calculated
Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.
Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.
These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary
Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers
Lighthouse
Mobile
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
8.60 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
19.25 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
1.24 s
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.000
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
8.60 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
21.50 s
Desktop
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
2.59 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
4.45 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
84 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.000
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
2.61 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
5.19 s
Categories
8Performance
119 HTTP requests — consider bundling or reducing
Security
Cookie 'X-Mapping-faaonofk' has no SameSite attribute
Accessibility
All checks pass
SEO
All checks pass
Infrastructure
All checks pass
Compliance
All checks pass
Content
All checks pass
Sustainability
All checks pass
How you compare
Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.
Technology stack
Adobe Fonts, on IIS, hosted on Microsoft IIS
Stack Architecture
Facebook Pixel 2.9.303
Google Analytics 
Google Tag Manager 
Microsoft Clarity 
Siteimprove 
StackAdapt 
TikTok Pixel 
Adobe Fonts 
BlueConic Facebook SDK 
Foundation HSTS 
LazySizes 
Microsoft ASP.NET 4.0.30319
Open Graph 
Windows Server 
YouTube ZURB Foundation 6.7.4
core-js 3.32.2
jQuery 3.5.0
IIS 10.0 Microsoft IIS 10.0All Detected Technologies (22)
Internet Information Services (IIS) is an extensible web server software created by Microsoft for use with the Windows NT family.
Adobe Fonts is a web-based service providing access to a vast library of high-quality fonts for web and print design.
BlueConic is the advanced customer data platform that liberates companies' first-party data from disparate systems.
HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.
LazySizes is a JavaScript library used to delay the loading of images (iframes, scripts, etc) until they come into view.
ASP.NET is an open-source, server-side web-application framework designed for web development to produce dynamic web pages.
Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.
Windows Server is a brand name for a group of server operating systems.
YouTube is a video sharing service where users can create their own profile, upload videos, watch, like and comment on other videos.
Zurb Foundation is used to prototype in the browser. Allows rapid creation of websites or applications while leveraging mobile and responsive technology. The front end framework is the collection of HTML, CSS, and Javascript containing design patterns.
core-js is a modular standard library for JavaScript, with polyfills for cutting-edge ECMAScript features.
jQuery is a JavaScript library which is a free, open-source software designed to simplify HTML DOM tree traversal and manipulation, as well as event handling, CSS animation, and Ajax.
Facebook pixel is an analytics tool that allows you to measure the effectiveness of your advertising.
Google Analytics is a free web analytics service that tracks and reports website traffic.
Google Tag Manager is a tag management system (TMS) that allows you to quickly and easily update measurement codes and related code fragments collectively known as tags on your website or mobile app.
Microsoft's Clarity is a analytics tool which provides website usage statistics, session recording, and heatmaps.
Siteimprove is a digital analytics and content QA platform.
StackAdapt is a platform that provides a content advertising strategy solution for planning, executing, and optimizing digital campaigns.
Observations (3)
Server version exposed in headers
The Server header reveals 'IIS 10.0'. Exposing exact server versions helps attackers target known vulnerabilities. Consider configuring your server to hide version information.
No build tool detected
A framework (Adobe Fonts) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.
Complex technology stack detected
22 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.
Show your score
Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.
This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.
[](https://beavercheck.com/results/af5ce110-d453-4669-bfe7-4a6a2a07457c)<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/af5ce110-d453-4669-bfe7-4a6a2a07457c"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Funr.edu" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Funr.eduExport & share
Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.
Copies markdown to clipboard
Fix Plan
Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.
Three-week fix plan
2 sprints · 6h total → projected B (81)
Sprint 1: Quick Wins
+3Highest ROI — low effort, high impact
- · 68 third-party resources (65% of weight)
- · Cookie 'X-Mapping-faaonofk' has no SameSite attribute
- · Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy header is missing
Sprint 2: Core Fixes
+2Medium effort, high structural impact
- · Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing
- · 119 HTTP requests — consider bundling or reducing