Skip to content
https://ptfarmada.com Export & share
Recent Trends
Performance stable →
100
TTFB degrading ↓
130ms
FCP improving ↑
1.1s
LCP improving ↑
1.2s
Scanned
2026-08-25 02:08 UTC
Worker
🇺🇸 New York
Duration
35.00s
Vs prev
no change

Global Performance

6/6 locations

Excellent global latency — average 53ms across 6 locations, fastest from Amsterdam (30ms), slowest from Madrid (78ms). Cloudflare edge cache (HIT).

United Stated - New York
Full audit
52ms
DNS 7ms · TLS 11ms
United States - Santa Clara
53ms
DNS 7ms · TLS 15ms
Singapore - Singapore
34ms
DNS 6ms · TLS 9ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
30ms
DNS 3ms · TLS 8ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
71ms
DNS 3ms · TLS 13ms
Spain - Madrid
78ms
DNS 1ms · TLS 23ms
CDN: Cloudflare (HIT) · Avg TTFB: 53ms · Cache: public, max-age=0, must-revalidate

Audit overview

All categories sit comfortably above the 70 threshold; this is a clean audit.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

4

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

0

High impact, requires investment.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Easy Improvements

1

Small gains, minimal effort.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Warning: 1

Unattributable: 386ms CPU time

Informational: CPU time spent on this resource. Total >1s is a perf budget violation.

Performance › JS Execution Cost
Warning: 2

https://ptfarmada.com/: 564ms CPU time

Informational: CPU time spent on this resource. Total >1s is a perf budget violation.

Performance › JS Execution Cost
Warning: 3

2 link(s) open in new tab without warning

Links with target="_blank" without rel="noopener" leak the originating page's window context — security and UX issue.

Accessibility › Link & Button Quality
Warning: 4

35 text node(s) render below 12 CSS pixels on mobile

Mobile browsers default the root font-size to 16 px; text below ~ 12 px is hard to read without zooming. Affects readability + WCAG 1.4.4 (Resize Text) effort.

Accessibility › Mobile-Readable Font Sizes
Warning: 5

Registrar lock is NOT enabled

Without registrar lock, an attacker who phishes your registrar credentials can transfer the domain in minutes — total brand hijack.

Infrastructure › Domain Intelligence
What fixing these means. Your site is in great shape. The remaining improvements are refinements rather than critical fixes. The 2 performance issues below shape how fast users perceive your page. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your conversion rate.
2 performance issues — Akamai's research found 53% of mobile users abandon pages over 3s.
2 accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology.
1 infrastructure issue creates a performance ceiling no frontend fix can overcome.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

Return on Investment

Your site is healthy — fixing remaining items has minimal financial upside.

We surface the figures only when the projected returns clear a 1% noise floor of the investment, so we don't print a misleading ROI when the audit is essentially clean. The sections below still list the specific findings if you want to chase the last few points.

Conversion barriers

No conversion barriers detected.

Barriers
0
Bounce delta
+0pp
added vs baseline
Score
100
A+
Speed
0
Trust
0
Usability
0
Content
0
Nav
0

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

£119 1.6 developer hours at £75/hr
Quick wins
£119 3 fixes in ~95 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

£ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

£0.03 / month at risk ~£0.33 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Bandwidth Waste

£0.03 /mo

431.2 MB/mo × 0.063 GBP/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~43 KB per page load
    Saves £0.03/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction
How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

98
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
100
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
92
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.55 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

2.31 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

61 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.016

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

1.55 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

2.31 s

Desktop

100
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
100
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
92
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

447 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

561 ms

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

447 ms

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

561 ms

Categories

8
Avg score 96.4

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Google Search Console · 4127 peers
You 96
·
Avg 74
+22 above average
0 50 100
Security P99Performance P98Accessibility P98Compliance P98Content P97Sustainability P96SEO P91Infrastructure P89
Better than 98% of Google Search Console sites See full Google Search Console benchmark →
HSTS · 2853 peers
You 96
·
Avg 76
+20 above average
0 50 100
Security P98Accessibility P97Compliance P97Performance P96Content P96Sustainability P94SEO P90Infrastructure P87
Better than 97% of HSTS sites See full HSTS benchmark →

Technology stack

Google Search Console, with Cloudflare CDN

6 technologies detected 2 stack layers 1 with CPE identifier Complex

Stack Architecture

Framework
Google Search Console HSTS HTTP/3 Open Graph Priority Hints
CDN
Cloudflare

All Detected Technologies (6)

Cloudflare is a web-infrastructure and website-security company, providing content-delivery-network services, DDoS mitigation, Internet security, and distributed domain-name-server services.

Categories CDN Website https://www.cloudflare.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header in redirect: cloudflare
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=4kJn3SFoN3CKfscYtJG6ACDtE57KklmE-UD75TDRaWQ

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

HTTP/3 is the third major version of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol used to exchange information on the World Wide Web.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://httpwg.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

Priority Hints exposes a mechanism for developers to signal a relative priority for browsers to consider when fetching resources.

Categories Performance Website https://wicg.github.io/priority-hints/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (1)

No build tool detected

A framework (Google Search Console) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fptfarmada.com)](https://beavercheck.com/sites/ptfarmada.com)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/ptfarmada.com"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fptfarmada.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fptfarmada.com

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

1 sprints · 2h total → projected A+ (99)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+3

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

5 findings 2h → A+ (99)
  • · Unattributable: 386ms CPU time
  • · https://ptfarmada.com/: 564ms CPU time
  • · Registrar lock is NOT enabled
  • · 2 link(s) open in new tab without warning
  • · 35 text node(s) render below 12 CSS pixels on mobile

Send Feedback