Skip to content
Scanned
2026-11-03 10:19 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
45.00s
Vs prev
—

Audit overview

All categories sit comfortably above the 70 threshold; this is a clean audit.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

3

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

1

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

1

Small gains, minimal effort.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Your mail setup has problems.

wellficent.com fails 1 mail check: DMARC policy is none — monitoring only. This is the kind of misconfiguration that sends your mail to spam.

Get a full deliverability audit — €179, 48h →

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Warning: 1

Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing

COEP enforces that all embedded resources opt-in to cross-origin embedding — required for cross-origin isolation features.

Security › Security Headers
Warning: 2

DMARC policy is none — monitoring only

DMARC p=none collects reports but doesn't actually block spoofed mail — phishing emails still reach inboxes.

Security › Email Security
Warning: 3

Permissions-Policy covers 3/10 high-risk features (30%)

Informational: a labeled value pair from the audit.

Security › Permissions-Policy Granularity
Warning: 4

https://wellficent.com/assets/site.js?v=0bec55557e...: 270ms CPU time

Informational: CPU time spent on this resource. Total >1s is a perf budget violation.

Performance › JS Execution Cost
Warning: 5

https://wellficent.com/en/: 283ms CPU time

Informational: CPU time spent on this resource. Total >1s is a perf budget violation.

Performance › JS Execution Cost
What fixing these means. Your site is in great shape. The remaining improvements are refinements rather than critical fixes. The 2 performance issues below shape how fast users perceive your page. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
3 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
2 performance issues — Akamai's research found 53% of mobile users abandon pages over 3s.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

$150 investment → $867/month returns

Investment
$150
1.5 h · 2 findings
Monthly returns
$867
$10,410/yr
Payback
0.2 mo
+6840% Y1
$50 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

1 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~3%.

Barriers
1
1 warn
Bounce delta
+3pp
added vs baseline
Score
97
A+
Speed
0
Trust
0
Usability
0
Content
1
Nav
0
  • Content is hard to read
    Graduate-level reading difficulty — limits the addressable audience for product or blog pages
    → Shorten sentences; replace jargon with plain language; target Flesch ease ≥60

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

$150 1.5 developer hours at $100/hr
Quick wins
$50 1 fixes in ~30 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

$ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

$867 / month at risk ~$10,410 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Bounce-Rate Cost

$867 /mo

+3.2pp bounce · ~322 lost visitors/mo

CPC: USD 2.69

Bandwidth Waste

$0.06 /mo

785.0 MB/mo × 0.080 USD/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~78 KB per page load
    Saves $0.06/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction
How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

99
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
100
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

957 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

2.12 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

76 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

1.35 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

2.23 s

Desktop

100
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
100
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

298 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

470 ms

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

412 ms

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

470 ms

Categories

8
Avg score 90.0

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Google Search Console · 4610 peers
You 91
·
Avg 75
+16 above average
0 50 100
Accessibility P96Security P95Performance P93SEO P92Content P92Compliance P19Sustainability P81Infrastructure P25

Top 10% of Google Search Console sites score 86+ on Compliance; you're at 72 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 95% of Google Search Console sites See full Google Search Console benchmark →
HSTS · 3637 peers
You 91
·
Avg 78
+13 above average
0 50 100
Accessibility P93Security P92SEO P92Content P91Performance P88Infrastructure P20Sustainability P74Compliance P27

Top 10% of HSTS sites score 95+ on Infrastructure; you're at 85 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 91% of HSTS sites See full HSTS benchmark →

Technology stack

Google Search Console

4 technologies detected 1 stack layers Standard

Stack Architecture

Framework
Google Search Console HSTS Open Graph RSS

All Detected Technologies (4)

Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=b65sIJRrN4k8eVRsVXPwUpxBENxnEYWmkcmkAiVqGYI

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

RSS is a family of web feed formats used to publish frequently updated works—such as blog entries, news headlines, audio, and video—in a standardized format.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (1)

No build tool detected

A framework (Google Search Console) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwellficent.com)](https://beavercheck.com/sites/wellficent.com)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/wellficent.com"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwellficent.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwellficent.com

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 2h total → projected A (94)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+3

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

4 findings 0h → A (94)
  • · Permissions-Policy covers 3/10 high-risk features (30%)
  • · https://wellficent.com/assets/site.js?v=0bec55557e...: 270ms CPU time
  • · https://wellficent.com/en/: 283ms CPU time
  • · DMARC policy is none — monitoring only

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

Medium effort, high structural impact

1 findings 1h → A (94)
  • · Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing

Send Feedback