Audit overview
Security and Sustainability need attention; the other categories are in good shape.
Fix Priority Matrix
5 findingsQuick Wins
3High impact, low effort — start here.
Strategic
2High impact, requires investment.
Easy Improvements
0Small gains, minimal effort.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Deprioritize
0Low impact, high effort — do last.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Screenshots
Top Priorities (5)
'unsafe-eval' found in script source
Unsafe value (unsafe-inline, unsafe-eval) in script-src defeats CSP's main protection — XSS injections can execute again.
Cookie 'geo' is missing the Secure flag
A cookie without the Secure flag can leak over HTTP — in HSTS-protected sites, this is still a defense-in-depth gap.
147 HTTP requests — consider bundling or reducing
High HTTP request count — bundling, sprite-ing, and HTTP/2 server push can reduce per-request overhead.
99 third-party resources (62% of weight)
Informational: third-party resource count and their share of page weight. High share caps perf gains from frontend optimization.
Cookie 'geo' has no SameSite attribute
Without SameSite, cookies ride along on cross-site requests — enabling CSRF attacks that SameSite=Lax blocks for free.
Business case
What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.
Return on investment
$1,050 investment → $3,195/month returns + USD 157,500 risk avoided
Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.
Conversion barriers
5 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~28%.
- Page takes 17.0s to loadUsers abandon at ~3s — you're 14.5s over the 2.5s threshold→ Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
- Page feels frozen for 693msClicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs→ Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
- 13 broken link(s) on the pageClicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends→ Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab
- No Content-Security-Policy headerHigher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form→ Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
- No skip-to-content linkKeyboard and screen-reader users must tab through the entire header on every page→ Add a visible-on-focus <a href="#main">Skip to content</a> as the first focusable element
Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.
Remediation cost
Start here for the best return on investment
Cost by category
Cost by effort level
Adjust assumptions
Team composition
Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.
Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead
Warning:Cost of inaction
Compliance Risk
$157,500
- No privacy policy link detectedCCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
- Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
- Multiple H1 headings (2 found)ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
Bounce-Rate Cost
$3,194 /mo
+27.5pp bounce · ~2,753 lost visitors/mo
CPC: USD 1.16
Bandwidth Waste
$0.76 /mo
9512.0 MB/mo × 0.080 USD/GB
- Optimize transfer: save ~951 KB per page loadSaves $0.76/mo
Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.
Unique monthly visitors from your analytics
Purchases, signups, or key actions
Optional — for revenue estimation
more engaged visitors from reduced bounce
Fix 2 critical issues to capture this value
How this is calculated
Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.
Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.
These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary
Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers
Lighthouse
Mobile
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
5.11 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
16.99 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
693 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.005
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
6.35 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
17.86 s
Desktop
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
970 ms
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
2.59 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
107 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.000
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
2.25 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
2.64 s
Categories
8Performance
147 HTTP requests — consider bundling or reducing
Security
'unsafe-eval' found in script source
Accessibility
All checks pass
SEO
All checks pass
Infrastructure
All checks pass
Compliance
All checks pass
Content
All checks pass
Sustainability
All checks pass
How you compare
Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.
Top 10% of HSTS sites score 92+ on Sustainability; you're at 66 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.
Technology stack
HSTS
Stack Architecture
Fourthwall 2616.1.0-external
HTTP/3 
Open Graph 
Priority Hints 
Sentry 
Svelte All Detected Technologies (7)
Fourthwall helps to create and launch a branded website.
HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.
HTTP/3 is the third major version of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol used to exchange information on the World Wide Web.
Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.
Priority Hints exposes a mechanism for developers to signal a relative priority for browsers to consider when fetching resources.
Sentry is an open-source platform for workflow productivity, aggregating errors from across the stack in real time.
Svelte is a free and open-source front end compiler created by Rich Harris and maintained by the Svelte core team members.
Observations (1)
No build tool detected
A framework (HSTS) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.
Show your score
Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.
This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.
[](https://beavercheck.com/results/b0ee0c27-78ec-403e-a47d-6a7fac15ce53)<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/b0ee0c27-78ec-403e-a47d-6a7fac15ce53"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpodcasts.apple.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpodcasts.apple.comExport & share
Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.
Copies markdown to clipboard
Fix Plan
Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.
Three-week fix plan
3 sprints · 10h total → projected B (83)
Sprint 1: Quick Wins
+5Highest ROI — low effort, high impact
- · Cookie 'geo' is missing the Secure flag
- · 99 third-party resources (62% of weight)
- · Cookie 'geo' has no SameSite attribute
Sprint 2: Core Fixes
+1Medium effort, high structural impact
- · 147 HTTP requests — consider bundling or reducing
Sprint 3: Strategic Improvements
+1Higher effort, long-term payoff
- · 'unsafe-eval' found in script source