Skip to content
BR · BRL (R$) · Estimated Applicable regulations: LGPD Dev cost: R$ 180/hr How jurisdiction is detected
Scanned
2026-04-22 23:59 UTC
Worker
🇺🇸 Santa Clara
Duration
1.5m
Vs prev

Audit overview

5 categories need attention: Security, and 4 others.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

3

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

2

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

HSTS header is missing

Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 3

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 4

Page weighs 20.8 MB (11.0 MB transferred)

Informational: total page weight (uncompressed) and bytes actually transferred over the wire.

Performance › Page Weight Budget
Critical: 5

No <main> landmark found

Without a <main> landmark, screen-reader users can't skip past the navigation to the page content — every page starts with re-reading the menu.

Accessibility › Landmark Structure
What fixing these means. Your site has several issues that may be affecting user experience and business outcomes. Your LCP of 55.9s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 1 performance issue below directly contributes to it. Accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology — an estimated 15% of your potential audience. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
3 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
Your LCP is 55.9s — fixing the 1 performance critical could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.
1 accessibility issue excludes users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

BRL 1,155 investment → BRL 9,432/month returns + BRL 50,000,000 risk avoided

Investment
BRL 1.155
6.4 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
BRL 9.432
BRL 113.181/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+9699% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided BRL 50.000.000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
BRL 1.1250.1 mo payback · +9961% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
BRL 75 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

10 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~38%.

Barriers
10
2 crit 8 warn
Bounce delta
+38pp
added vs baseline
Score
56
C
Speed
2
Trust
2
Usability
2
Content
3
Nav
1
  • Page takes 55.9s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 53.4s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • No viewport meta tag
    Mobile browsers render at desktop width and shrink — text unreadable, tap targets miniature
    → Add <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1">
  • High main-thread blocking time
    Page is non-interactive for 511ms after first paint
    → Defer third-party scripts and split large bundles
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

R$1,155 6.4 developer hours at R$180/hr
Quick wins
R$75 2 fixes in ~25 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

R$ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

BRL 9.432 / month at risk ~BRL 113.181 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

BRL 50.000.000

LGPD
  • No privacy policy link detected
    LGPD: BRL 10.000 – BRL 50.000.000
  • Privacy Policy not detected
    LGPD: BRL 10.000 – BRL 50.000.000

Bounce-Rate Cost

BRL 9.418 /mo

+37.7pp bounce · ~3,767 lost visitors/mo

CPC: BRL 2.50

Bandwidth Waste

BRL 14 /mo

34602.6 MB/mo × 0.410 BRL/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~3.5 MB per page load
    Saves BRL 14/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

39
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
92
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

10.88 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

55.87 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

511 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.110

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

19.44 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

56.33 s

Desktop

55
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
89
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

4.47 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

7.57 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

26 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.053

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

5.70 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

7.70 s

Categories

8
Avg score 66.2

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Amazon ELB · 173 peers
You 67
·
Avg 70
At average
0 50 100
Better than 2% of Amazon ELB sites See full Amazon ELB benchmark →
Microsoft 365 · 2421 peers
You 67
·
Avg 72
At average
0 50 100
Infrastructure P3Sustainability P4Compliance P9Content P10SEO P12Accessibility P20Performance P34Security P59

Top 10% of Microsoft 365 sites score 94+ on Infrastructure; you're at 77 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 1% of Microsoft 365 sites See full Microsoft 365 benchmark →

Technology stack

Amazon ELB, hosted on Amazon Web Services

3 technologies detected 2 stack layers Standard

Stack Architecture

Framework
Amazon ELB Microsoft 365
Hosting
Amazon Web Services

All Detected Technologies (3)

Amazon Web Services (AWS) is a comprehensive cloud services platform offering compute power, database storage, content delivery and other functionality.

Categories PaaS Website https://aws.amazon.com/ Detected by BeaverCheck

AWS ELB is a network load balancer service provided by Amazon Web Services for distributing traffic across multiple targets, such as Amazon EC2 instances, containers, IP addresses, and Lambda functions.

Categories Load balancers Website https://aws.amazon.com/elasticloadbalancing/ Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Email Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence TXT SPF record includes spf.protection.outlook.com: v=spf1 ip4:189.28.129.7 ip4:189.28.130.8 ip4:189.28.129.17 ip4:189.28.129.18 ip4:189.28.129.19 ip4:189.28.129.25 ip4:189.9.35.150 include:spf.protection.outlook.com include:spf.messagelabs.com -all

Observations (1)

No build tool detected

A framework (Amazon ELB) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fsaude.gov.br)](https://beavercheck.com/results/b129c0b6-1d10-4f57-b60e-dddbd513e059)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/b129c0b6-1d10-4f57-b60e-dddbd513e059"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fsaude.gov.br" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fsaude.gov.br

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 6h total → projected C (77)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+7

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

3 findings 0h → C (74)
  • · Page weighs 20.8 MB (11.0 MB transferred)
  • · No <main> landmark found
  • · HSTS header is missing

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+3

Medium effort, high structural impact

2 findings 6h → C (77)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found

Send Feedback