Skip to content
https://www.gonetcrm.pl Export & share
PL · PLN (zł) · Estimated Applicable regulations: RODO · ePrivacy Directive · EAA Dev cost: PLN 150/hr How jurisdiction is detected
Scanned
2026-09-23 09:39 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
47.00s
Vs prev

Global Performance

6/6 locations

High global latency — average 1593ms across 6 locations, fastest from Amsterdam (213ms), slowest from Santa Clara (2372ms). No CDN (document or assets). Cache-Control header is missing. 4 locations above the 500ms target.

Spain - Madrid
Full audit
296ms
DNS 62ms · TLS 129ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
213ms
DNS 84ms · TLS 72ms
United Stated - New York
2354ms
DNS 216ms · TLS 1912ms
United States - Santa Clara
2372ms
DNS 335ms · TLS 1697ms
Singapore - Singapore
2307ms
DNS 468ms · TLS 1479ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
2019ms
DNS 432ms · TLS 1179ms
CDN: No CDN (document or assets) · Avg TTFB: 1593ms · Cache: No cache headers

Audit overview

All categories sit comfortably above the 70 threshold; this is a clean audit.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

2

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

3

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Your mail setup has problems.

gonetcrm.pl fails 2 mail checks: No DMARC record found, No SPF record found. This is the kind of misconfiguration that sends your mail to spam.

Get a full deliverability audit — €179, 48h →

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

HSTS header is missing

Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.

Security › Security Headers
Warning: 3

Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing

COEP enforces that all embedded resources opt-in to cross-origin embedding — required for cross-origin isolation features.

Security › Security Headers
Warning: 4

Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy header is missing

COOP isolates your top-level browsing context from cross-origin windows — without it, popup-based side-channel attacks remain possible.

Security › Security Headers
Warning: 5

No DMARC record found

Without DMARC, anyone can send phishing emails using your domain name.

Security › Email Security
What fixing these means. Your site is in great shape. The remaining improvements are refinements rather than critical fixes. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
5 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

PLN 825 investment → PLN 13,949/month returns + EUR 500,000 risk avoided

Investment
PLN 825
5.5 h · 5 findings
Monthly returns
PLN 13 949
PLN 167 382/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+20189% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided EUR 500.000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
PLN 6380.0 mo payback · +26156% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
PLN 75 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

5 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~10%.

Barriers
5
5 warn
Bounce delta
+10pp
added vs baseline
Score
85
A
Speed
0
Trust
2
Usability
0
Content
1
Nav
2
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • Content is hard to read
    Graduate-level reading difficulty — limits the addressable audience for product or blog pages
    → Shorten sentences; replace jargon with plain language; target Flesch ease ≥60
  • No skip-to-content link
    Keyboard and screen-reader users must tab through the entire header on every page
    → Add a visible-on-focus <a href="#main">Skip to content</a> as the first focusable element
  • 1 broken link(s) on the page
    Clicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends
    → Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

zł825 5.5 developer hours at zł150/hr
Quick wins
zł75 2 fixes in ~30 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

/hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

PLN 13 949 / month at risk ~PLN 167 382 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

€500.000

EAA
  • Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)
    EAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000

Bounce-Rate Cost

PLN 13 948 /mo

+10.0pp bounce · ~996 lost visitors/mo

CPC: PLN 14.00

Bandwidth Waste

PLN 0,16 /mo

498.0 MB/mo × 0.320 PLN/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~50 KB per page load
    Saves PLN 0,16/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 2 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

99
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
100
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

908 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

1.96 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

1.03 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

1.98 s

Desktop

100
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
100
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

247 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

450 ms

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

404 ms

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

454 ms

Categories

8
Avg score 88.2

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Debian · 17 peers
You 88
·
Avg 74
+14 above average
0 50 100
Better than 94% of Debian sites See full Debian benchmark →
Open Graph · 4144 peers
You 88
·
Avg 76
+12 above average
0 50 100
Performance P93SEO P93Accessibility P91Security P87Sustainability P79Content P75Compliance P33Infrastructure P51

Top 10% of Open Graph sites score 87+ on Compliance; you're at 76 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 91% of Open Graph sites See full Open Graph benchmark →

Technology stack

Debian, on Apache, hosted on Apache HTTP Server

4 technologies detected 3 stack layers 2 with CPE identifier Standard

Stack Architecture

Framework
Debian Open Graph
Server
Apache 2.2.22
Hosting
Apache HTTP Server 2.2.22

All Detected Technologies (4)

Categories Server Website https://httpd.apache.org Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header: Apache/2.2.22 (Debian)

Apache is a free and open-source cross-platform web server software.

Categories Web servers Website https://httpd.apache.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Debian is a Linux software which is a free open-source software.

Categories Operating systems Website https://debian.org Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (2)

Server version exposed in headers

The Server header reveals 'Apache 2.2.22'. Exposing exact server versions helps attackers target known vulnerabilities. Consider configuring your server to hide version information.

→ Security

No build tool detected

A framework (Debian) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.gonetcrm.pl)](https://beavercheck.com/sites/gonetcrm.pl)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/gonetcrm.pl"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.gonetcrm.pl" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.gonetcrm.pl

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 6h total → projected A (92)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+4

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

2 findings 0h → A (92)
  • · HSTS header is missing
  • · Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy header is missing

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

Medium effort, high structural impact

3 findings 5h → A (92)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing
  • · No DMARC record found

Send Feedback