Skip to content
https://art.pl Export & share
PL · PLN (zł) · Estimated Applicable regulations: RODO · ePrivacy Directive · EAA Dev cost: PLN 150/hr How jurisdiction is detected
Scanned
2026-04-22 21:11 UTC
Worker
🇧🇷 Sao Paulo
Duration
1.1m
Vs prev

Audit overview

4 categories need attention: Security, and 3 others.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

3

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

2

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

HSTS header is missing

Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 3

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 4

Page weighs 4.8 MB (4.8 MB transferred)

Informational: total page weight (uncompressed) and bytes actually transferred over the wire.

Performance › Page Weight Budget
Critical: 5

2 image-in-link without alt text

Image-only links with no alt create empty links — screen-reader users hear 'link' with no destination context.

Accessibility › Alt Text Quality
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Your LCP of 4.6s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 1 performance issue below directly contributes to it. Accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology — an estimated 15% of your potential audience. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
3 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
Your LCP is 4.6s — fixing the 1 performance critical could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.
1 accessibility issue excludes users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

PLN 1,013 investment → PLN 19,273/month returns + EUR 20,500,000 risk avoided

Investment
PLN 1 013
6.8 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
PLN 19 273
PLN 231 271/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+22742% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided EUR 20.500.000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
PLN 9380.0 mo payback · +24569% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
PLN 113 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

8 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~28%.

Barriers
8
1 crit 7 warn
Bounce delta
+28pp
added vs baseline
Score
69
C
Speed
1
Trust
2
Usability
0
Content
3
Nav
2
  • Page takes 4.6s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 2.1s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • No Open Graph tags
    Links shared on LinkedIn / Slack / Facebook show bare URLs — referral clicks drop
    → Add og:title, og:description, og:image, og:url to the page head
  • No structured data
    No rich-result eligibility in Google — lower SERP CTR vs competitors with stars and prices
    → Add JSON-LD for your page type (Product, Article, FAQPage, LocalBusiness, …)

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

zł1,013 6.8 developer hours at zł150/hr
Quick wins
zł113 2 fixes in ~45 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

/hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

PLN 12 896 / month at risk ~PLN 154 747 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

€20.500.000

RODOEAA
  • No privacy policy link detected
    RODO: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000
  • Privacy Policy not detected
    RODO: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000
  • Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)
    EAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000

Bounce-Rate Cost

PLN 12 891 /mo

+27.8pp bounce · ~2,778 lost visitors/mo

CPC: PLN 4.64

Bandwidth Waste

PLN 4,82 /mo

15057.2 MB/mo × 0.320 PLN/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~1.5 MB per page load
    Saves PLN 4,82/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

74
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
66
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

2.57 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

4.55 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

2 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.064

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

6.30 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

4.55 s

Desktop

90
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
72
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

810 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

1.22 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.067

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

2.42 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

1.22 s

Categories

8
Avg score 71.8

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Cart Functionality · 568 peers
You 70
·
Avg 73
At average
0 50 100
Compliance P7Content P7Infrastructure P17SEO P23Accessibility P32Sustainability P67Security P34Performance P66

Top 10% of Cart Functionality sites score 86+ on Compliance; you're at 66 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 13% of Cart Functionality sites See full Cart Functionality benchmark →
jQuery · 1925 peers
You 70
·
Avg 73
At average
0 50 100
Compliance P5Content P10Infrastructure P18SEO P19Accessibility P29Security P41Sustainability P58Performance P56

Top 10% of jQuery sites score 86+ on Compliance; you're at 66 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 11% of jQuery sites See full jQuery benchmark →

Technology stack

Masonry, hosted on OVH, with Nginx CDN

6 technologies detected 4 stack layers 2 with CPE identifier Complex

Stack Architecture

Ecommerce
Cart Functionality
Framework
Masonry Slick jQuery 3.6.0
CDN
Nginx
Hosting
OVH

All Detected Technologies (6)

Nginx is a web server that can also be used as a reverse proxy, load balancer, mail proxy and HTTP cache.

Categories Web servers, Reverse proxies Website https://nginx.org/en Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header: nginx
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →
Categories Hosting Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence NS record: ns14.ovh.net

Websites that have a shopping cart or checkout page, either using a known ecommerce platform or a custom solution.

Categories Ecommerce Website https://www.wappalyzer.com/technologies/ecommerce/cart-functionality Detected by BeaverCheck

Masonry is a JavaScript library that enables a cascading grid layout, positioning elements based on available vertical space for an optimized, gap-free arrangement.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://masonry.desandro.com Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://kenwheeler.github.io/slick Detected by BeaverCheck

jQuery is a JavaScript library which is a free, open-source software designed to simplify HTML DOM tree traversal and manipulation, as well as event handling, CSS animation, and Ajax.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://jquery.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL: https://art.pl/jquery/jquery-3.6.0.min.js
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Observations (1)

No build tool detected

A framework (Masonry) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fart.pl)](https://beavercheck.com/results/b4228787-fd70-4441-b973-1ffa7a5e0c15)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/b4228787-fd70-4441-b973-1ffa7a5e0c15"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fart.pl" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fart.pl

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 7h total → projected B (80)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+7

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

3 findings 1h → C (77)
  • · Page weighs 4.8 MB (4.8 MB transferred)
  • · HSTS header is missing
  • · 2 image-in-link without alt text

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+3

Medium effort, high structural impact

2 findings 6h → B (80)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found

Send Feedback