Skip to content
https://support.microsoft.com Export & share
Scanned
2026-04-21 18:47 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
1.2m
Vs prev

Audit overview

3 categories need attention: Security, and 2 others.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

2

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

3

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 3

1 button(s) with no accessible text

Buttons with no accessible text (icon-only, no aria-label) can't be activated by voice control or understood by screen readers.

Accessibility › Link & Button Quality
Critical: 4

1 control(s) without accessible label

Form controls without labels — assistive tech announces 'edit text' with no context; users can't complete forms.

Accessibility › Form Accessibility
Critical: 5

1 image-only link(s) without alt text

Image-only links with no alt are unidentifiable to screen-reader users — link's destination is invisible.

Accessibility › Link & Button Quality
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. The 2 security gaps leave your users exposed — modern browsers increasingly warn visitors about insecure sites. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
2 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
3 accessibility issues exclude users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

$800 investment → $5,451/month returns + USD 157,500 risk avoided

Investment
$800
8.0 h · 5 findings
Monthly returns
$5,451
$65,416/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+8077% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided USD 157,500
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
$6500.1 mo payback · +9964% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
$100 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

9 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~30%.

Barriers
9
2 crit 7 warn
Bounce delta
+30pp
added vs baseline
Score
59
C
Speed
2
Trust
2
Usability
1
Content
2
Nav
2
  • Page takes 13.2s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 10.7s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • 19 broken link(s) on the page
    Clicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends
    → Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab
  • High main-thread blocking time
    Page is non-interactive for 488ms after first paint
    → Defer third-party scripts and split large bundles
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

$800 8.0 developer hours at $100/hr
Quick wins
$100 2 fixes in ~60 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

$ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

$3,520 / month at risk ~$42,239 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

$157,500

ADA Title IIICCPA/CPRA
  • No privacy policy link detected
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • Trackers detected but no cookie policy found
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • Trackers detected but no privacy policy found
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500

Bounce-Rate Cost

$3,519 /mo

+30.3pp bounce · ~3,034 lost visitors/mo

CPC: USD 1.16

Bandwidth Waste

$0.69 /mo

8583.5 MB/mo × 0.080 USD/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~858 KB per page load
    Saves $0.69/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

47
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
96
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
81
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

6.55 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

13.17 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

488 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

6.55 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

13.70 s

Desktop

78
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
100
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
81
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.01 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

1.57 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.280

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

1.25 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

1.58 s

Categories

8
Avg score 74.0

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Cart Functionality · 568 peers
You 74
·
Avg 73
At average
0 50 100
Content P1Security P6Performance P88Infrastructure P86SEO P16Accessibility P73Compliance P37Sustainability P56

Top 10% of Cart Functionality sites score 95+ on Content; you're at 55 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 55% of Cart Functionality sites See full Cart Functionality benchmark →
Azure Front Door · 35 peers
You 74
·
Avg 74
At average
0 50 100
Better than 45% of Azure Front Door sites See full Azure Front Door benchmark →

Technology stack

Azure Front Door, hosted on Azure, with Azure CDN CDN

8 technologies detected 5 stack layers 1 with CPE identifier Complex

Stack Architecture

Analytics
Azure Monitor
Ecommerce
Cart Functionality
Framework
Azure Front Door HSTS core-js 3.19.3 jQuery 3.5.1
CDN
Azure CDN
Hosting
Azure

All Detected Technologies (8)

Categories CDN Website https://azure.microsoft.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence x-azure-ref: 20260421T184559Z-r1ff48f47d75n7pshC1PARfc3c00000004b000000000ge57

Azure is a cloud computing service for building, testing, deploying, and managing applications and services through Microsoft-managed data centers.

Categories PaaS Website https://azure.microsoft.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Header: x-azure-ref

Websites that have a shopping cart or checkout page, either using a known ecommerce platform or a custom solution.

Categories Ecommerce Website https://www.wappalyzer.com/technologies/ecommerce/cart-functionality Detected by BeaverCheck

Azure Front Door is a scalable and secure entry point for fast delivery of your global web applications.

Categories Load balancers Website https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/frontdoor/ Detected by BeaverCheck

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

core-js is a modular standard library for JavaScript, with polyfills for cutting-edge ECMAScript features.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://github.com/zloirock/core-js Detected by BeaverCheck

jQuery is a JavaScript library which is a free, open-source software designed to simplify HTML DOM tree traversal and manipulation, as well as event handling, CSS animation, and Ajax.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://jquery.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Azure Monitor collects monitoring telemetry from a variety of on-premises and Azure sources. Azure Monitor helps you maximise the availability and performance of your applications and services.

Categories Analytics, Performance Website https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/services/monitor Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (2)

No build tool detected

A framework (Azure Front Door) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

8 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fsupport.microsoft.com)](https://beavercheck.com/results/b4eff9e3-2b63-4d91-842e-a600a8727840)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/b4eff9e3-2b63-4d91-842e-a600a8727840"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fsupport.microsoft.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fsupport.microsoft.com

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 8h total → projected B (82)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+3

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

2 findings 1h → C (77)
  • · 1 button(s) with no accessible text
  • · 1 image-only link(s) without alt text

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+5

Medium effort, high structural impact

3 findings 7h → B (82)
  • · 1 control(s) without accessible label
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found

Send Feedback