Skip to content
Scanned
2026-10-03 20:37 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
39.00s
Vs prev
—

Global Performance

6/6 locations ✓

Acceptable global latency — average 481ms across 6 locations, fastest from Amsterdam (49ms), slowest from Sao Paulo (1020ms). No CDN (document or assets). Cache-Control disables caching (no-store). 3 locations above the 500ms target.

Spain - Madrid
Full audit
199ms
DNS 49ms · TLS 77ms
United Stated - New York
347ms
DNS 23ms · TLS 164ms
Singapore - Singapore
667ms
DNS 10ms · TLS 330ms
United States - Santa Clara
603ms
DNS 28ms · TLS 291ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
49ms
DNS 21ms · TLS 17ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
1020ms
DNS 227ms · TLS 400ms
CDN: No CDN (document or assets) · Avg TTFB: 481ms · Cache: no-store

Audit overview

Compliance needs attention; the rest of the categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

4

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

1

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Your mail setup has problems.

romastartup.org fails 1 mail check: No DMARC record found. This is the kind of misconfiguration that sends your mail to spam.

Get a full deliverability audit — €179, 48h →

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

Cookie 'nevercache-b39818' is missing the Secure flag

A cookie without the Secure flag can leak over HTTP — in HSTS-protected sites, this is still a defense-in-depth gap.

Security › Cookie Security
Critical: 3

HSTS header is missing

Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 4

No <main> landmark found

Without a <main> landmark, screen-reader users can't skip past the navigation to the page content — every page starts with re-reading the menu.

Accessibility › Landmark Structure
Warning: 5

10 third-party resources (42% of weight)

Informational: third-party resource count and their share of page weight. High share caps perf gains from frontend optimization.

Performance › Page Weight Inventory
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. The 1 performance issue below shapes how fast users perceive your page. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
3 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
1 accessibility issue excludes users who rely on assistive technology.
1 performance issue — Akamai's research found 53% of mobile users abandon pages over 3s.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

$367 investment → $4,730/month returns + USD 150,000 risk avoided

Investment
$367
3.7 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
$4,730
$56,757/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+15379% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided USD 150,000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
$350 → 0.1 mo payback · +16116% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
$67 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

7 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~18%.

Barriers
7
7 warn
Bounce delta
+18pp
added vs baseline
Score
79
B
Speed
0
Trust
2
Usability
1
Content
3
Nav
1
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • Layout shifts during page load
    Content movement causes mis-clicks on CTAs and form fields
    → Add width/height to images; reserve space for late-loading embeds
  • No Open Graph tags
    Links shared on LinkedIn / Slack / Facebook show bare URLs — referral clicks drop
    → Add og:title, og:description, og:image, og:url to the page head
  • No structured data
    No rich-result eligibility in Google — lower SERP CTR vs competitors with stars and prices
    → Add JSON-LD for your page type (Product, Article, FAQPage, LocalBusiness, …)

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

$367 3.7 developer hours at $100/hr
Quick wins
$67 3 fixes in ~40 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

$ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

$4,730 / month at risk ~$56,757 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

$150,000

ADA Title III
  • No <main> landmark found
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
  • No <nav> landmark found
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000
  • Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000

Bounce-Rate Cost

$4,730 /mo

+17.6pp bounce · ~1,758 lost visitors/mo

CPC: USD 2.69

Bandwidth Waste

$0.00 /mo

28.1 MB/mo × 0.080 USD/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~3 KB per page load
    Saves $0.00/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 4 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

91
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
96
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
50
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

797 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

1.69 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.193

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

797 ms

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

1.69 s

Desktop

97
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
96
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
50
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

234 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

475 ms

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.102

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

234 ms

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

475 ms

Categories

8
Avg score 79.2

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Microsoft 365 · 2539 peers
You 82
·
Avg 73
+9 above average
0 50 100
Compliance P3Performance P97Security P96Accessibility P93Infrastructure P16Sustainability P80SEO P26Content P37

Top 10% of Microsoft 365 sites score 85+ on Compliance; you're at 64 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 96% of Microsoft 365 sites See full Microsoft 365 benchmark →
Nginx · 1126 peers
You 82
·
Avg 75
+7 above average
0 50 100
Compliance P6SEO P11Security P89Infrastructure P15Performance P85Accessibility P81Content P29Sustainability P67

Top 10% of Nginx sites score 85+ on Compliance; you're at 64 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 85% of Nginx sites See full Nginx benchmark →

Technology stack

Microsoft 365, hosted on GoDaddy, with Nginx CDN

3 technologies detected 3 stack layers 1 with CPE identifier Standard

Stack Architecture

Framework
Microsoft 365
CDN
Nginx
Hosting
GoDaddy

All Detected Technologies (3)

Nginx is a web server that can also be used as a reverse proxy, load balancer, mail proxy and HTTP cache.

Categories Web servers, Reverse proxies Website https://nginx.org/en Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Server header: nginx
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →
Categories Hosting Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence NS record: ns42.domaincontrol.com
Categories Email Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence MX record: romastartup-org.mail.protection.outlook.com

Observations (1)

No build tool detected

A framework (Microsoft 365) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fromastartup.org)](https://beavercheck.com/sites/romastartup.org)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/romastartup.org"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fromastartup.org" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fromastartup.org

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 4h total → projected B (89)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+7

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

4 findings 1h → B (89)
  • · No <main> landmark found
  • · Cookie 'nevercache-b39818' is missing the Secure flag
  • · HSTS header is missing
  • · 10 third-party resources (42% of weight)

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

Medium effort, high structural impact

1 findings 3h → B (89)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Send Feedback