Skip to content
FR · EUR (€) · Estimated Applicable regulations: RGPD · ePrivacy Directive · EAA Dev cost: €80/hr How jurisdiction is detected
Scanned
2026-04-22 21:44 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
1.0m
Vs prev

Audit overview

Security needs attention; the rest of the categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

1

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

4

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 3

4 control(s) without accessible label

Form controls without labels — assistive tech announces 'edit text' with no context; users can't complete forms.

Accessibility › Form Accessibility
Warning: 4

32 third-party resources (100% of weight)

Informational: third-party resource count and their share of page weight. High share caps perf gains from frontend optimization.

Performance › Page Weight Inventory
Warning: 5

Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing

COEP enforces that all embedded resources opt-in to cross-origin embedding — required for cross-origin isolation features.

Security › Security Headers
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Your LCP of 6.5s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 1 performance issue below directly contributes to it. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
3 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
1 accessibility issue excludes users who rely on assistive technology.
Your LCP is 6.5s — fixing the 1 performance critical could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

€640 investment → €9,482/month returns + EUR 120,500,000 risk avoided

Investment
€640
8.0 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
€9.482
€113.784/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+17679% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided EUR 120.500.000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
€5600.1 mo payback · +20219% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

5 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~26%.

Barriers
5
2 crit 3 warn
Bounce delta
+26pp
added vs baseline
Score
71
B
Speed
1
Trust
1
Usability
1
Content
0
Nav
2
  • Page takes 6.5s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 4.0s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • 4 form field(s) without a label
    Screen readers skip unlabeled fields; autofill can't identify them; checkout abandonment spikes
    → Associate every input with a visible <label for="…">; add autocomplete attributes
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • No skip-to-content link
    Keyboard and screen-reader users must tab through the entire header on every page
    → Add a visible-on-focus <a href="#main">Skip to content</a> as the first focusable element
  • 1 broken link(s) on the page
    Clicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends
    → Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

€640 8.0 developer hours at €80/hr

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

/hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

€5.658 / month at risk ~€67.894 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

€120.500.000

ePrivacy DirectiveRGPDEAA
  • No privacy policy link detected
    RGPD: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000
  • Trackers detected but no cookie policy found
    RGPD: EUR 5.000 – EUR 10.000.000
  • Trackers detected but no cookie policy found
    RGPD: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000

Bounce-Rate Cost

€5.658 /mo

+25.7pp bounce · ~2,572 lost visitors/mo

CPC: EUR 2.20

Bandwidth Waste

€0,24 /mo

3236.1 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~324 KB per page load
    Saves €0,24/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 3 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

69
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
96
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

3.46 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

6.53 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

116 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.034

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

3.46 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

7.17 s

Desktop

96
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
97
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

892 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

1.26 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

17 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.007

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

892 ms

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

1.56 s

Categories

8
Avg score 81.6

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Cloudflare · 2102 peers
You 79
·
Avg 74
At average
0 50 100
Accessibility P90Content P80Performance P74Infrastructure P30Compliance P30SEO P70Security P36Sustainability P46

Top 10% of Cloudflare sites score 98+ on Infrastructure; you're at 87 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 81% of Cloudflare sites See full Cloudflare benchmark →
Facebook · 1407 peers
You 79
·
Avg 72
+7 above average
0 50 100
Accessibility P95Performance P91Content P79Sustainability P75Compliance P32SEO P68Security P40Infrastructure P45

Top 10% of Facebook sites score 85+ on Compliance; you're at 76 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 94% of Facebook sites See full Facebook benchmark →

Technology stack

Cloudflare

10 technologies detected 2 stack layers Enterprise

Stack Architecture

Analytics
AT Internet Analyzer
Framework
Cloudflare Facebook Google Search Console Google Workspace HSTS Microsoft Open Graph Priority Hints Webpack

All Detected Technologies (10)

Categories DNS Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence NS record: will.ns.cloudflare.com
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: facebook-domain-verification=xoa3f0dvw2vuhhcck1qopu6anc2rjs
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=oQhQt_X40ZsEdQcHepraHzVjqB_N601xTClNFbXjuvs
Categories Email Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence TXT SPF record includes _spf.google.com: v=spf1 a mx include:mediapartspf.octopuce.fr include:_spf.google.com include:sendgrid.net include:mail.zendesk.com include:message-business.com ip4:5.1.98.133 -all

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Low Evidence TXT record: MS=A7B4FD5DF118737C3E854C8EE741E2ECCE46C23A

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

Priority Hints exposes a mechanism for developers to signal a relative priority for browsers to consider when fetching resources.

Categories Performance Website https://wicg.github.io/priority-hints/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Webpack is an open-source JavaScript module bundler.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://webpack.js.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Chunk pattern: https://www.mediapart.fr/assets/build/default/front/nouvelle_formule/js/commons.23df507ff2f81a66.js
Categories Analytics Website https://atinternet.com/en Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (2)

No build tool detected

A framework (Cloudflare) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

10 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmediapart.fr)](https://beavercheck.com/results/ba58dc89-91ef-4820-87c7-ebe6eec7efb6)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/ba58dc89-91ef-4820-87c7-ebe6eec7efb6"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmediapart.fr" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmediapart.fr

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 8h total → projected B (86)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+1

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

1 findings 0h → B (80)
  • · 32 third-party resources (100% of weight)

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+6

Medium effort, high structural impact

4 findings 8h → B (86)
  • · 4 control(s) without accessible label
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found
  • · Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing

Send Feedback