Skip to content
Scanned
2026-08-24 14:12 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
38.00s
Vs prev

Global Performance

6/6 locations

Acceptable global latency — average 494ms across 6 locations, fastest from Amsterdam (153ms), slowest from Sao Paulo (822ms). No CDN detected. Cache-Control disables caching (no-store). 3 locations above the 500ms target.

Spain - Madrid
Full audit
190ms
DNS 61ms · TLS 40ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
153ms
DNS 23ms · TLS 38ms
United Stated - New York
437ms
DNS 111ms · TLS 108ms
United States - Santa Clara
673ms
DNS 166ms · TLS 170ms
Singapore - Singapore
689ms
DNS 181ms · TLS 169ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
822ms
DNS 190ms · TLS 211ms
CDN: No CDN · Avg TTFB: 494ms · Cache: no-store

Audit overview

Compliance and Content need attention; the other categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

3

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

2

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Your mail setup has problems.

osteriadelpane.com fails 2 mail checks: No DMARC record found, No SPF record found. This is the kind of misconfiguration that sends your mail to spam.

Get a full deliverability audit — €179, 48h →

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

5 publicly-accessible JavaScript source map(s)

Source maps reveal original source code (variable names, comments, file structure) and are shipped to production by mistake almost universally. The standard fix is a one-line build-tool config change.

Security › Source Map Exposure
Critical: 2

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 3

Cookie 'COOKIE-TECNICO-DI-SESSIONE' is missing the Secure flag

A cookie without the Secure flag can leak over HTTP — in HSTS-protected sites, this is still a defense-in-depth gap.

Security › Cookie Security
Critical: 4

HSTS header is missing

Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 5

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
5 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

$700 investment → $14,589/month returns + USD 157,500 risk avoided

Investment
$700
7.0 h · 5 findings
Monthly returns
$14,589
$175,068/yr
Payback
0.0 mo
+24910% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided USD 157,500
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
$3750.0 mo payback · +46585% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
$100 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

9 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~31%.

Barriers
9
2 crit 7 warn
Bounce delta
+31pp
added vs baseline
Score
59
C
Speed
1
Trust
2
Usability
1
Content
3
Nav
2
  • Page takes 8.2s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 5.7s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • 5 form field(s) without a label
    Screen readers skip unlabeled fields; autofill can't identify them; checkout abandonment spikes
    → Associate every input with a visible <label for="…">; add autocomplete attributes
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • No Open Graph tags
    Links shared on LinkedIn / Slack / Facebook show bare URLs — referral clicks drop
    → Add og:title, og:description, og:image, og:url to the page head

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

$700 7.0 developer hours at $100/hr
Quick wins
$100 3 fixes in ~60 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

$ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

$8,447 / month at risk ~$101,366 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

$157,500

ADA Title IIICCPA/CPRA
  • No privacy policy link detected
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • 1 non-essential cookie(s) set without consent banner
    CCPA/CPRA: USD 2,500 – USD 7,500
  • No <main> landmark found
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000

Bounce-Rate Cost

$8,447 /mo

+31.4pp bounce · ~3,140 lost visitors/mo

CPC: USD 2.69

Bandwidth Waste

$0.40 /mo

5037.5 MB/mo × 0.080 USD/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~504 KB per page load
    Saves $0.40/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

73
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
96
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
90
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

2.14 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

8.15 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.000

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

3.03 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

8.16 s

Desktop

96
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
96
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
90
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

470 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

1.39 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.001

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

885 ms

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

1.39 s

Categories

8
Avg score 79.1

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

HTTP/3 · 1825 peers
You 81
·
Avg 77
At average
0 50 100
Compliance P3Content P12Infrastructure P14Accessibility P78SEO P24Security P76Performance P75Sustainability P71

Top 10% of HTTP/3 sites score 87+ on Compliance; you're at 62 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 74% of HTTP/3 sites See full HTTP/3 benchmark →
jQuery · 2078 peers
You 81
·
Avg 74
+7 above average
0 50 100
Compliance P2SEO P4Performance P93Security P92Accessibility P92Sustainability P89Content P15Infrastructure P27

Top 10% of jQuery sites score 85+ on Compliance; you're at 62 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 91% of jQuery sites See full jQuery benchmark →

Technology stack

HTTP/3, hosted on Aruba.it

6 technologies detected 2 stack layers 2 with CPE identifier Complex

Stack Architecture

Framework
HTTP/3 Slick SweetAlert2 jQuery 3.6.0 jQuery UI 1.13.1
Hosting
Aruba.it

All Detected Technologies (6)

Aruba.it is an Italian company mainly active in the web hosting and domain registration businesses.

Categories Hosting, PaaS Website https://www.aruba.it Detected by BeaverCheck

HTTP/3 is the third major version of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol used to exchange information on the World Wide Web.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://httpwg.org/ Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://kenwheeler.github.io/slick Detected by BeaverCheck

SweetAlert2 is a JavaScript library that provides customisable, visually appealing, and responsive alert and modal dialog boxes for web applications.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://sweetalert2.github.io/ Detected by BeaverCheck

jQuery is a JavaScript library which is a free, open-source software designed to simplify HTML DOM tree traversal and manipulation, as well as event handling, CSS animation, and Ajax.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://jquery.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL: https://www.osteriadelpane.com/js/jquery-3.6.0.min.js
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

jQuery UI is a collection of GUI widgets, animated visual effects, and themes implemented with jQuery, Cascading Style Sheets, and HTML.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://jqueryui.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Observations (1)

No build tool detected

A framework (HTTP/3) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.osteriadelpane.com)](https://beavercheck.com/sites/osteriadelpane.com)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/osteriadelpane.com"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.osteriadelpane.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.osteriadelpane.com

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 7h total → projected B (86)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+5

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

3 findings 1h → B (86)
  • · Cookie 'COOKIE-TECNICO-DI-SESSIONE' is missing the Secure flag
  • · HSTS header is missing
  • · 5 publicly-accessible JavaScript source map(s)

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

Medium effort, high structural impact

2 findings 6h → B (86)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found

Send Feedback