Skip to content
https://reg.ru Export & share
RU · RUB (₽) · Estimated Dev cost: ₽3,500/hr How jurisdiction is detected
Scanned
2026-04-16 17:10 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
1.1m
Vs prev

Audit overview

3 categories need attention: Security, and 2 others.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

3

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

2

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

HSTS header is missing

Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 3

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 4

Page weighs 5.6 MB (4.6 MB transferred)

Informational: total page weight (uncompressed) and bytes actually transferred over the wire.

Performance › Page Weight Budget
Critical: 5

1 image-only link(s) without alt text

Image-only links with no alt are unidentifiable to screen-reader users — link's destination is invisible.

Accessibility › Link & Button Quality
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Your LCP of 10.7s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 1 performance issue below directly contributes to it. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
3 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
Your LCP is 10.7s — fixing the 1 performance critical could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.
1 accessibility issue excludes users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

₽23,625 investment → ₽412,243/month returns

Investment
₽23 625
6.8 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
₽412 243
₽4 946 912/yr
Payback
0.1 mo
+20839% Y1
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
₽21 8750.1 mo payback · +22514% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
₽2 625 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

8 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~29%.

Barriers
8
2 crit 6 warn
Bounce delta
+29pp
added vs baseline
Score
62
C
Speed
2
Trust
2
Usability
1
Content
1
Nav
2
  • Page takes 10.7s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 8.2s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • 5 broken link(s) on the page
    Clicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends
    → Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab
  • High main-thread blocking time
    Page is non-interactive for 557ms after first paint
    → Defer third-party scripts and split large bundles
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

₽23,625 6.8 developer hours at ₽3500/hr
Quick wins
₽2,625 2 fixes in ~45 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

/hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

₽305 739 / month at risk ~₽3 668 866 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Bounce-Rate Cost

₽305 633 /mo

+29.0pp bounce · ~2,898 lost visitors/mo

CPC: RUB 105.45

Bandwidth Waste

₽105 /mo

14489.6 MB/mo × 7.273 RUB/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~1.4 MB per page load
    Saves ₽105/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

42
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
56
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

5.13 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

10.65 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

557 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.079

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

8.72 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

20.02 s

Desktop

75
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
56
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
92
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.77 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

2.77 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

14 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.048

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

1.91 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

2.92 s

Categories

8
Avg score 72.0

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Google Search Console · 3873 peers
You 70
·
Avg 73
At average
0 50 100
Compliance P1Security P23Infrastructure P27Performance P29SEO P36Content P37Accessibility P63Sustainability P42

Top 10% of Google Search Console sites score 85+ on Compliance; you're at 62 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 13% of Google Search Console sites See full Google Search Console benchmark →
Nuxt.js · 81 peers
You 70
·
Avg 73
At average
0 50 100
Better than 12% of Nuxt.js sites See full Nuxt.js benchmark →

Technology stack

Google Search Console

5 technologies detected 2 stack layers 2 with CPE identifier Standard

Stack Architecture

Analytics
ADFOX
Framework
Google Search Console Nuxt.js Sentry Vue.js

All Detected Technologies (5)

Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=C2fqzBtaO7m79tR37QPhe2yx_Y35JFYtt6556Gmtt8I

Nuxt is a Vue framework for developing modern web applications.

Categories JavaScript frameworks, Web frameworks, Static site generator Website https://nuxt.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL: https://showcase-static.reg.ru/_nuxt/static/D8GZKfwo.js
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Sentry is an open-source platform for workflow productivity, aggregating errors from across the stack in real time.

Categories Issue trackers Website https://sentry.io/ Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Vue.js is an open-source model–view–viewmodel JavaScript framework for building user interfaces and single-page applications.

Categories JavaScript frameworks Website https://vuejs.org Detected by BeaverCheck

ADFOX is an advertising management platform for media publishers.

Categories Advertising Website https://adfox.yandex.ru Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (1)

No build tool detected

A framework (Google Search Console) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Freg.ru)](https://beavercheck.com/results/be7b56bf-fcc7-4a0e-9078-d3fb2d9e8778)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/be7b56bf-fcc7-4a0e-9078-d3fb2d9e8778"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Freg.ru" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Freg.ru

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 7h total → projected B (80)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+7

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

3 findings 1h → C (77)
  • · Page weighs 5.6 MB (4.6 MB transferred)
  • · HSTS header is missing
  • · 1 image-only link(s) without alt text

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+3

Medium effort, high structural impact

2 findings 6h → B (80)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found

Send Feedback