Global Performance
6/6 locations ✓High global latency — average 1044ms across 6 locations, fastest from Amsterdam (590ms), slowest from Sao Paulo (1865ms). No CDN detected. 6 locations above the 500ms target.
Audit overview
3 categories need attention: Accessibility, and 2 others.
Fix Priority Matrix
5 findingsQuick Wins
4High impact, low effort — start here.
Strategic
1High impact, requires investment.
Easy Improvements
0Small gains, minimal effort.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Deprioritize
0Low impact, high effort — do last.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Screenshots
Top Priorities (5)
Content-Security-Policy header is missing
Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.
Cookie 'PHPSESSID' is missing the Secure flag
A cookie without the Secure flag can leak over HTTP — in HSTS-protected sites, this is still a defense-in-depth gap.
Cookie 'admin_lang' is missing the Secure flag
A cookie without the Secure flag can leak over HTTP — in HSTS-protected sites, this is still a defense-in-depth gap.
Cookie 'home_lang' is missing the Secure flag
A cookie without the Secure flag can leak over HTTP — in HSTS-protected sites, this is still a defense-in-depth gap.
Cookie 'lang_info' is missing the Secure flag
A cookie without the Secure flag can leak over HTTP — in HSTS-protected sites, this is still a defense-in-depth gap.
Business case
What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.
Return on investment
¥1,400 investment → ¥31,910/month returns + CNY 50,000,000 risk avoided
Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.
Conversion barriers
12 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~27%.
- Page loads in 3.3sEvery additional 100ms above 2.5s costs conversions — you're 770ms over→ Target <2.5s LCP: defer non-critical scripts and optimize the hero image
- High main-thread blocking timePage is non-interactive for 274ms after first paint→ Defer third-party scripts and split large bundles
- No HSTS headerReturning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request→ Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
- No Content-Security-Policy headerHigher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form→ Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
- 1 form field(s) without a labelScreen readers skip unlabeled fields; autofill can't identify them; checkout abandonment spikes→ Associate every input with a visible <label for="…">; add autocomplete attributes
Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.
Remediation cost
Start here for the best return on investment
Cost by category
Cost by effort level
Adjust assumptions
Team composition
Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.
Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead
Warning:Cost of inaction
Compliance Risk
¥50,000,000
- No privacy policy link detectedPIPL: CNY 100,000 – CNY 50,000,000
- 7 non-essential cookie(s) set without consent bannerPIPL: CNY 100,000 – CNY 50,000,000
- 1 advertising/retargeting trackers detectedPIPL: CNY 100,000 – CNY 50,000,000
Bounce-Rate Cost
¥26,513 /mo
+26.5pp bounce · ~2,651 lost visitors/mo
CPC: CNY 10.00
Bandwidth Waste
¥9.48 /mo
16585.9 MB/mo × 0.571 CNY/GB
- Optimize transfer: save ~1.7 MB per page loadSaves ¥9.48/mo
Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.
Unique monthly visitors from your analytics
Purchases, signups, or key actions
Optional — for revenue estimation
more engaged visitors from reduced bounce
Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value
How this is calculated
Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.
Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.
These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary
Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers
Lighthouse
Mobile
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
1.23 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
3.27 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
274 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.009
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
4.61 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
6.59 s
Desktop
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
500 ms
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
799 ms
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
0 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.000
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
1.88 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
799 ms
Categories
8Performance
All checks pass
Security
Content-Security-Policy header is missing
Accessibility
All checks pass
SEO
All checks pass
Infrastructure
All checks pass
Compliance
All checks pass
Content
All checks pass
Sustainability
All checks pass
How you compare
Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.
Top 10% of Font Awesome sites score 85+ on Compliance; you're at 54 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.
Top 10% of HSTS sites score 86+ on Compliance; you're at 54 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.
Technology stack
Font Awesome, on PHP, with Nginx CDN
Stack Architecture
Google Ads 
Google Ads Conversion Tracking 
Google Analytics 
Google Tag Manager 
Font Awesome HSTS 
HTTP/3 
PHP 
Nginx All Detected Technologies (9)
Nginx is a web server that can also be used as a reverse proxy, load balancer, mail proxy and HTTP cache.
PHP is a general-purpose scripting language used for web development.
Font Awesome is a font and icon toolkit based on CSS and Less.
HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.
HTTP/3 is the third major version of the Hypertext Transfer Protocol used to exchange information on the World Wide Web.
Google Ads is an online advertising platform developed by Google.
Google Ads Conversion Tracking is a free tool that shows you what happens after a customer interacts with your ads.
Google Analytics is a free web analytics service that tracks and reports website traffic.
Google Tag Manager is a tag management system (TMS) that allows you to quickly and easily update measurement codes and related code fragments collectively known as tags on your website or mobile app.
Observations (2)
No build tool detected
A framework (Font Awesome) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.
Complex technology stack detected
9 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.
Show your score
Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.
This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.
[](https://beavercheck.com/results/c03515d1-9e22-41fa-ac61-3d6b14cf5bdd)<a href="https://beavercheck.com/results/c03515d1-9e22-41fa-ac61-3d6b14cf5bdd"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.jxdeco-packaging.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.jxdeco-packaging.comExport & share
Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.
Copies markdown to clipboard
Fix Plan
Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.
Three-week fix plan
2 sprints · 4h total → projected B (82)
Sprint 1: Quick Wins
+6Highest ROI — low effort, high impact
- · Cookie 'PHPSESSID' is missing the Secure flag
- · Cookie 'admin_lang' is missing the Secure flag
- · Cookie 'home_lang' is missing the Secure flag
- · Cookie 'lang_info' is missing the Secure flag
Sprint 2: Core Fixes
Medium effort, high structural impact
- · Content-Security-Policy header is missing