Skip to content
Scanned
2026-07-31 16:23 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
1.1m
Vs prev

Global Performance

6/6 locations

Acceptable global latency — average 277ms across 6 locations, fastest from Amsterdam (56ms), slowest from Sao Paulo (595ms). No CDN detected. Cache-Control header is missing. 2 locations above the 500ms target.

Spain - Madrid
Full audit
117ms
DNS 34ms · TLS 54ms
United Stated - New York
102ms
DNS 57ms · TLS 29ms
United States - Santa Clara
267ms
DNS 33ms · TLS 47ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
56ms
DNS 23ms · TLS 21ms
Singapore - Singapore
526ms
DNS 11ms · TLS 341ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
595ms
DNS 231ms · TLS 242ms
CDN: No CDN · Avg TTFB: 277ms · Cache: No cache headers

Audit overview

Accessibility and Sustainability need attention; the other categories are in good shape.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

3

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

2

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

HSTS header is missing

Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 3

No Content-Security-Policy header found

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 4

Page weighs 10.2 MB (9.1 MB transferred)

Informational: total page weight (uncompressed) and bytes actually transferred over the wire.

Performance › Page Weight Budget
Critical: 5

1 button(s) with no accessible text

Buttons with no accessible text (icon-only, no aria-label) can't be activated by voice control or understood by screen readers.

Accessibility › Link & Button Quality
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Your LCP of 6.8s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 1 performance issue below directly contributes to it. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
3 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
Your LCP is 6.8s — fixing the 1 performance critical could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.
1 accessibility issue excludes users who rely on assistive technology.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

€574 investment → €11,778/month returns + EUR 500,000 risk avoided

Investment
€574
6.8 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
€11.778
€141.332/yr
Payback
0.0 mo
+24533% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided EUR 500.000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
€5310.0 mo payback · +26504% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
€64 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

9 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~34%.

Barriers
9
4 crit 5 warn
Bounce delta
+34pp
added vs baseline
Score
45
D
Speed
1
Trust
2
Usability
2
Content
1
Nav
3
  • Page takes 6.8s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 4.3s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • Severe layout shift during page load
    Users mis-click when content jumps — converting intent into frustration
    → Reserve space for images, ads, and embeds with explicit width/height
  • 6 form field(s) without a label
    Screen readers skip unlabeled fields; autofill can't identify them; checkout abandonment spikes
    → Associate every input with a visible <label for="…">; add autocomplete attributes
  • 9 broken link(s) on the page
    Clicks land on 404s — trust drops and the session often ends
    → Fix or remove the broken destinations surfaced on the Content tab
  • No HSTS header
    Returning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request
    → Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

€574 6.8 developer hours at €85/hr
Quick wins
€64 2 fixes in ~45 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

/hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

€7.577 / month at risk ~€90.920 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

€500.000

EAA
  • No <main> landmark found
    EAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000
  • 2 of 2 <nav> elements are unlabeled
    EAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000
  • Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)
    EAA: EUR 1.000 – EUR 500.000

Bounce-Rate Cost

€7.575 /mo

+34.4pp bounce · ~3,443 lost visitors/mo

CPC: EUR 2.20

Bandwidth Waste

€2,13 /mo

28743.7 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~2.9 MB per page load
    Saves €2,13/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

53
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
79
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
92
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
85
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

3.82 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

6.82 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

48 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.269

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

4.29 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

7.47 s

Desktop

87
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
79
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
96
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
85
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.31 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

1.83 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.012

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

1.65 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

1.83 s

Categories

8
Avg score 75.4

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Bootstrap · 963 peers
You 77
·
Avg 74
At average
0 50 100
Security P89Infrastructure P18Sustainability P18Compliance P22SEO P26Content P30Performance P62Accessibility P53

Top 10% of Bootstrap sites score 95+ on Infrastructure; you're at 82 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 70% of Bootstrap sites See full Bootstrap benchmark →
Htmx · 86 peers
You 77
·
Avg 87
-10 below average
0 50 100
Better than 12% of Htmx sites See full Htmx benchmark →

Technology stack

Bootstrap 5.3.8, hosted on GoDaddy

8 technologies detected 2 stack layers 2 with CPE identifier Complex

Stack Architecture

Framework
Bootstrap 5.3.8 Htmx 1.9.12 Open Graph Popper Priority Hints Tailwind CSS jQuery 3.6.0
Hosting
GoDaddy

All Detected Technologies (8)

Categories Hosting Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence NS record: ns44.domaincontrol.com

Bootstrap is a free and open-source CSS framework directed at responsive, mobile-first front-end web development. It contains CSS and JavaScript-based design templates for typography, forms, buttons, navigation, and other interface components.

Categories UI frameworks Website https://getbootstrap.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Found 10 Bootstrap class patterns in HTML
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Htmx is a JavaScript library for performing AJAX requests, triggering CSS transitions, and invoking WebSocket and server-sent events directly from HTML elements.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://htmx.org Detected by BeaverCheck

Open Graph is a protocol that is used to integrate any web page into the social graph.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://ogp.me Detected by BeaverCheck

Popper is a positioning engine, its purpose is to calculate the position of an element to make it possible to position it near a given reference element.

Categories Miscellaneous Website https://popper.js.org Detected by BeaverCheck

Priority Hints exposes a mechanism for developers to signal a relative priority for browsers to consider when fetching resources.

Categories Performance Website https://wicg.github.io/priority-hints/ Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Framework Website https://tailwindcss.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Found 17 unique Tailwind utility classes in HTML

jQuery is a JavaScript library which is a free, open-source software designed to simplify HTML DOM tree traversal and manipulation, as well as event handling, CSS animation, and Ajax.

Categories JavaScript libraries Website https://jquery.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Script URL: https://static.nubiles-porn.com/assets/bootstrapBase/js/jquery/jquery-3.6.0.js
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Observations (2)

No build tool detected

A framework (Bootstrap) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

8 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmomteachsex.com)](https://beavercheck.com/sites/momteachsex.com)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/momteachsex.com"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmomteachsex.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fmomteachsex.com

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 7h total → projected B (86)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+6

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

3 findings 1h → B (83)
  • · Page weighs 10.2 MB (9.1 MB transferred)
  • · HSTS header is missing
  • · 1 button(s) with no accessible text

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+3

Medium effort, high structural impact

2 findings 6h → B (86)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
  • · No Content-Security-Policy header found

Send Feedback