Skip to content
IT · EUR (€) · Estimated Applicable regulations: GDPR · ePrivacy Directive · EAA Dev cost: €55/hr How jurisdiction is detected
Scanned
2026-07-31 07:16 UTC
Worker
🇺🇸 New York
Duration
1.1m
Vs prev

Global Performance

6/6 locations

High global latency — average 536ms across 6 locations, fastest from Amsterdam (84ms), slowest from Santa Clara (847ms). No CDN detected. Cache-Control header is missing. 4 locations above the 500ms target.

United Stated - New York
Full audit
619ms
DNS 302ms · TLS 99ms
Spain - Madrid
177ms
DNS 71ms · TLS 27ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
84ms
DNS 26ms · TLS 13ms
United States - Santa Clara
847ms
DNS 330ms · TLS 165ms
Singapore - Singapore
671ms
DNS 169ms · TLS 159ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
821ms
DNS 204ms · TLS 197ms
CDN: No CDN · Avg TTFB: 536ms · Cache: No cache headers

Audit overview

3 categories need attention: Accessibility, and 2 others.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

4

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

1

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.

Security › Security Headers
Critical: 2

Cookie '__uzma' is missing the Secure flag

A cookie without the Secure flag can leak over HTTP — in HSTS-protected sites, this is still a defense-in-depth gap.

Security › Cookie Security
Critical: 3

Cookie '__uzmb' is missing the Secure flag

A cookie without the Secure flag can leak over HTTP — in HSTS-protected sites, this is still a defense-in-depth gap.

Security › Cookie Security
Critical: 4

Cookie '__uzmc' is missing the Secure flag

A cookie without the Secure flag can leak over HTTP — in HSTS-protected sites, this is still a defense-in-depth gap.

Security › Cookie Security
Critical: 5

Cookie '__uzmd' is missing the Secure flag

A cookie without the Secure flag can leak over HTTP — in HSTS-protected sites, this is still a defense-in-depth gap.

Security › Cookie Security
What fixing these means. Your site performs reasonably well, but a few targeted fixes could meaningfully improve results. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
5 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

€220 investment → €13,008/month returns + EUR 120,500,000 risk avoided

Investment
€220
4.0 h · 5 findings
Monthly returns
€13.008
€156.099/yr
Payback
0.0 mo
+70854% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided EUR 120.500.000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
€1930.0 mo payback · +80990% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.
€55 — in quick wins — start here for the fastest payback

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

10 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~40%.

Barriers
10
3 crit 7 warn
Bounce delta
+40pp
added vs baseline
Score
49
D
Speed
2
Trust
1
Usability
3
Content
3
Nav
1
  • Page takes 10.3s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 7.8s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • Page feels frozen for 3.0s
    Clicks on the primary CTA are ignored while JavaScript runs
    → Break up long tasks; defer non-critical JavaScript to post-hydration
  • No viewport meta tag
    Mobile browsers render at desktop width and shrink — text unreadable, tap targets miniature
    → Add <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1">
  • No Content-Security-Policy header
    Higher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form
    → Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
  • Layout shifts during page load
    Content movement causes mis-clicks on CTAs and form fields
    → Add width/height to images; reserve space for late-loading embeds

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

€220 4.0 developer hours at €55/hr
Quick wins
€55 4 fixes in ~60 minutes

Start here for the best return on investment

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

/hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

€8.780 / month at risk ~€105.365 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

€120.500.000

ePrivacy DirectiveGDPREAA
  • No privacy policy link detected
    GDPR: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000
  • 7 non-essential cookie(s) set without consent banner
    GDPR: EUR 5.000 – EUR 10.000.000
  • 7 non-essential cookie(s) set without consent banner
    GDPR: EUR 10.000 – EUR 20.000.000

Bounce-Rate Cost

€8.779 /mo

+39.9pp bounce · ~3,991 lost visitors/mo

CPC: EUR 2.20

Bandwidth Waste

€1,32 /mo

17813.8 MB/mo × 0.074 EUR/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~1.8 MB per page load
    Saves €1,32/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

21
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
67
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
92
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
83
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

4.15 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

10.31 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

2.99 s

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.190

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

8.42 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

20.53 s

Desktop

45
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
66
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
92
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
83
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.34 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

3.21 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

196 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.519

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

2.93 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

4.49 s

Categories

8
Avg score 71.1

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Google Search Console · 3966 peers
You 74
·
Avg 74
At average
0 50 100
Compliance P1Infrastructure P5Security P89Accessibility P82Sustainability P22SEO P23Content P32Performance P50

Top 10% of Google Search Console sites score 85+ on Compliance; you're at 53 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 50% of Google Search Console sites See full Google Search Console benchmark →
hCaptcha · 30 peers
You 74
·
Avg 75
At average
0 50 100
Better than 26% of hCaptcha sites See full hCaptcha benchmark →

Technology stack

Google Search Console

6 technologies detected 1 stack layers 1 with CPE identifier Complex

Stack Architecture

Framework
Google Search Console HSTS Microsoft Microsoft 365 Sentry hCaptcha 1

All Detected Technologies (6)

Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence TXT record: google-site-verification=RfA-g9qlyNg_4XnJIKs3pun6h3gFghffotf1bBgGxA0

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Analytics Detected by BeaverCheck · Low Evidence TXT record: MS=ms47156154
Categories Email Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence MX record: cdpreti-it.mail.protection.outlook.com

Sentry is an open-source platform for workflow productivity, aggregating errors from across the stack in real time.

Categories Issue trackers Website https://sentry.io/ Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

hCaptcha is an anti-bot solution that protects user privacy and rewards websites.

Categories Security Website https://www.hcaptcha.com Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (1)

No build tool detected

A framework (Google Search Console) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdp.it)](https://beavercheck.com/sites/cdp.it)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/cdp.it"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdp.it" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcdp.it

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

2 sprints · 4h total → projected C (79)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+5

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

4 findings 1h → C (79)
  • · Cookie '__uzma' is missing the Secure flag
  • · Cookie '__uzmb' is missing the Secure flag
  • · Cookie '__uzmc' is missing the Secure flag
  • · Cookie '__uzmd' is missing the Secure flag

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

Medium effort, high structural impact

1 findings 3h → C (79)
  • · Content-Security-Policy header is missing

Send Feedback