Global Performance
6/6 locations ✓High global latency — average 528ms across 6 locations, fastest from New York (88ms), slowest from Singapore (914ms). No CDN detected. Cache-Control header is missing. 3 locations above the 500ms target.
Audit overview
3 categories need attention: Compliance, and 2 others.
Fix Priority Matrix
5 findingsQuick Wins
3High impact, low effort — start here.
Strategic
2High impact, requires investment.
Easy Improvements
0Small gains, minimal effort.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Deprioritize
0Low impact, high effort — do last.
Nothing in this quadrant — good news.
Screenshots
Your mail setup has problems.
smy3engg.com fails 1 mail check: No DMARC record found. This is the kind of misconfiguration that sends your mail to spam.
Top Priorities (5)
Content-Security-Policy header is missing
Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything your users type — including credentials.
HSTS header is missing
Without HSTS, a network attacker can downgrade the very first connection to HTTP and steal the user's session.
No Content-Security-Policy header found
Without a CSP, a single XSS bug can exfiltrate everything users type — credentials, payment data, session tokens.
Page weighs 7.4 MB (7.4 MB transferred)
Informational: total page weight (uncompressed) and bytes actually transferred over the wire.
No favicon or icon links detected
Without a favicon, your tab shows a blank icon and bookmarks look unbranded — amateur signal in every browser surface.
Business case
What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.
Return on investment
£506 investment → £6,332/month returns + GBP 18,050,000 risk avoided
Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.
Conversion barriers
9 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~25%.
- Page loads in 3.3sEvery additional 100ms above 2.5s costs conversions — you're 790ms over→ Target <2.5s LCP: defer non-critical scripts and optimize the hero image
- No HSTS headerReturning visitors are briefly exposed to downgrade attacks on first request→ Set Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains
- No Content-Security-Policy headerHigher XSS blast radius — one compromised script can exfiltrate the checkout form→ Ship a reporting-only CSP first, then enforce once violations are clean
- Layout shifts during page loadContent movement causes mis-clicks on CTAs and form fields→ Add width/height to images; reserve space for late-loading embeds
- No Open Graph tagsLinks shared on LinkedIn / Slack / Facebook show bare URLs — referral clicks drop→ Add og:title, og:description, og:image, og:url to the page head
Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.
Remediation cost
Start here for the best return on investment
Cost by category
Cost by effort level
Adjust assumptions
Team composition
Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.
Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead
Warning:Cost of inaction
Compliance Risk
£18,050,000
- No privacy policy link detectedUK GDPR: GBP 10,000 – GBP 17,500,000
- Trackers detected but no cookie policy foundUK GDPR: GBP 10,000 – GBP 17,500,000
- Trackers detected but no cookie policy foundPECR: GBP 1,000 – GBP 500,000
Bounce-Rate Cost
£5,169 /mo
+24.6pp bounce · ~2,461 lost visitors/mo
CPC: GBP 2.10
Bandwidth Waste
£1.46 /mo
23243.2 MB/mo × 0.063 GBP/GB
- Optimize transfer: save ~2.3 MB per page loadSaves £1.46/mo
Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.
Unique monthly visitors from your analytics
Purchases, signups, or key actions
Optional — for revenue estimation
more engaged visitors from reduced bounce
Fix 5 critical issues to capture this value
How this is calculated
Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.
Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.
These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary
Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers
Lighthouse
Mobile
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
3.29 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
3.29 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
0 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.139
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
5.00 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
3.29 s
Desktop
First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.
1.39 s
Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.
1.39 s
Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.
0 ms
Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.
0.052
Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.
2.31 s
Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.
1.39 s
Categories
8Performance
Page weighs 7.4 MB (7.4 MB transferred)
Security
Content-Security-Policy header is missing
Accessibility
No favicon or icon links detected
SEO
All checks pass
Infrastructure
All checks pass
Compliance
All checks pass
Content
All checks pass
Sustainability
All checks pass
How you compare
Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.
Top 10% of Google Font API sites score 85+ on Compliance; you're at 63 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.
Top 10% of Google Search Console sites score 86+ on Compliance; you're at 63 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.
Technology stack
Google Font API, on IIS/ASP.NET, hosted on Microsoft IIS
Stack Architecture
Google Font API Google Search Console Google Workspace Microsoft Microsoft 365 
Microsoft ASP.NET 
Plesk 
Windows Server ASP.NET 
IIS 10.0 Microsoft IIS 10.0All Detected Technologies (11)
Internet Information Services (IIS) is an extensible web server software created by Microsoft for use with the Windows NT family.
Google Font API is a web service that supports open-source font files that can be used on your web designs.
ASP.NET is an open-source, server-side web-application framework designed for web development to produce dynamic web pages.
Plesk is a web hosting and server data centre automation software with a control panel developed for Linux and Windows-based retail hosting service providers.
Windows Server is a brand name for a group of server operating systems.
Observations (3)
Server version exposed in headers
The Server header reveals 'IIS 10.0'. Exposing exact server versions helps attackers target known vulnerabilities. Consider configuring your server to hide version information.
No build tool detected
A framework (Google Font API) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.
Complex technology stack detected
11 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.
Show your score
Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.
This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.
[](https://beavercheck.com/sites/smy3engg.com)<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/smy3engg.com"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.smy3engg.com" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.smy3engg.comExport & share
Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.
Copies markdown to clipboard
Fix Plan
Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.
Three-week fix plan
2 sprints · 7h total → projected B (88)
Sprint 1: Quick Wins
+7Highest ROI — low effort, high impact
- · Page weighs 7.4 MB (7.4 MB transferred)
- · HSTS header is missing
- · No favicon or icon links detected
Sprint 2: Core Fixes
+3Medium effort, high structural impact
- · Content-Security-Policy header is missing
- · No Content-Security-Policy header found