Skip to content
Scanned
2026-10-07 12:34 UTC
Worker
🇪🇸 Madrid
Duration
50.00s
Vs prev
—

Global Performance

6/6 locations ✓

Acceptable global latency — average 251ms across 6 locations, fastest from New York (72ms), slowest from Singapore (485ms). Netlify edge cache ("Netlify Edge"; fwd=miss; fwd-status=200; stored).

Spain - Madrid
Full audit
280ms
DNS 1ms · TLS 25ms
United Stated - New York
72ms
DNS 7ms · TLS 10ms
Netherlands - Amsterdam
246ms
DNS 7ms · TLS 11ms
United States - Santa Clara
146ms
DNS 8ms · TLS 5ms
Brazil - Sao Paulo
279ms
DNS 7ms · TLS 4ms
Singapore - Singapore
485ms
DNS 5ms · TLS 3ms
CDN: Netlify ("Netlify Edge"; fwd=miss; fwd-status=200; stored) · Avg TTFB: 251ms · Cache: max-age=31536000

Audit overview

All categories sit comfortably above the 70 threshold; this is a clean audit.

Fix Priority Matrix

5 findings

Quick Wins

1

High impact, low effort — start here.

Strategic

4

High impact, requires investment.

Easy Improvements

0

Small gains, minimal effort.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

Deprioritize

0

Low impact, high effort — do last.

Nothing in this quadrant — good news.

← Low effort High effort →

Screenshots

DESKTOP + MOBILE
Desktop
Desktop screenshot
Mobile
Mobile screenshot

Your mail setup has problems.

tmsarl.netlify.app fails 2 mail checks: No DMARC record found, No SPF record found. This is the kind of misconfiguration that sends your mail to spam.

Get a full deliverability audit — €179, 48h →

Top Priorities (5)

Sorted by impact
Critical: 1

'unsafe-eval' found in script source

Unsafe value (unsafe-inline, unsafe-eval) in script-src defeats CSP's main protection — XSS injections can execute again.

Security › Content Security Policy
Critical: 2

'unsafe-inline' found in script source

Unsafe value (unsafe-inline, unsafe-eval) in script-src defeats CSP's main protection — XSS injections can execute again.

Security › Content Security Policy
Warning: 3

69 inline style attribute(s) detected

Inline style attributes force `style-src 'unsafe-inline'` in any CSP -- effectively negating CSP's XSS-mitigation value for stylesheets.

Security › CSP Inline-Style Readiness
Warning: 4

7 third-party resources (46% of weight)

Informational: third-party resource count and their share of page weight. High share caps perf gains from frontend optimization.

Performance › Page Weight Inventory
Warning: 5

Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing

COEP enforces that all embedded resources opt-in to cross-origin embedding — required for cross-origin isolation features.

Security › Security Headers
What fixing these means. Your site is in great shape. The remaining improvements are refinements rather than critical fixes. Your LCP of 5.0s exceeds Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold and the 1 performance issue below directly contributes to it. Addressing the critical issues below would have the most immediate impact on your user trust.
4 security gaps detected — browsers may warn visitors about your site.
Your LCP is 5.0s — fixing the 1 performance critical could bring it under Google's 2.5s 'Good' threshold.

Business case

What fixing the audit's findings is worth -- and what ignoring them keeps costing.

Return on investment

$1,700 investment → $10,089/month returns + USD 150,000 risk avoided

Investment
$1,700
17.0 h · 4 findings
Monthly returns
$10,089
$121,062/yr
Payback
0.2 mo
+7021% Y1
Regulatory risk avoided USD 150,000
Or — fix only the top 3 findings
$1,600 → 0.2 mo payback · +7466% Y1
Optimistic scenario assuming the top 3 capture most of the upside. Real-world recovery typically falls between this projection and the full-fix ROI above.

Figures combine localized regulatory fine ceilings, search/conversion value priced against local CPC, and bandwidth waste estimates. Results depend on implementation quality and audience composition. Not legal or financial advice.

Conversion barriers

6 barrier(s) likely increasing bounce by ~26%.

Barriers
6
1 crit 5 warn
Bounce delta
+26pp
added vs baseline
Score
75
B
Speed
1
Trust
0
Usability
0
Content
3
Nav
2
  • Page takes 5.0s to load
    Users abandon at ~3s — you're 2.5s over the 2.5s threshold
    → Optimize render-blocking resources, preload the hero image, and compress images
  • No Open Graph tags
    Links shared on LinkedIn / Slack / Facebook show bare URLs — referral clicks drop
    → Add og:title, og:description, og:image, og:url to the page head
  • No structured data
    No rich-result eligibility in Google — lower SERP CTR vs competitors with stars and prices
    → Add JSON-LD for your page type (Product, Article, FAQPage, LocalBusiness, …)
  • Content is hard to read
    Graduate-level reading difficulty — limits the addressable audience for product or blog pages
    → Shorten sentences; replace jargon with plain language; target Flesch ease ≥60
  • No skip-to-content link
    Keyboard and screen-reader users must tab through the entire header on every page
    → Add a visible-on-focus <a href="#main">Skip to content</a> as the first focusable element

Preliminary CRO audit — each barrier links to the tab with detailed analysis.

Remediation cost

$1,700 17.0 developer hours at $100/hr

Cost by category

Cost by effort level

Adjust assumptions

Team composition

Multiplier applied to dev hours to reflect QA, design, and PM overhead. Use Dev only for solo work; Full team for projects with formal review processes.

$ /hr

Rates reflect fully-loaded developer cost including overhead

How developer rates are sourced

Warning:Cost of inaction

$7,061 / month at risk ~$84,737 / year if left unfixed
Default is 10,000. Use your own number for accurate $-figures.

Compliance Risk

$150,000

ADA Title III
  • Skip navigation link is missing (WCAG 2.4.1)
    ADA Title III: USD 25,000 – USD 150,000

Bounce-Rate Cost

$7,061 /mo

+26.3pp bounce · ~2,625 lost visitors/mo

CPC: USD 2.69

Bandwidth Waste

$0.15 /mo

1906.4 MB/mo × 0.080 USD/GB

  • Optimize transfer: save ~191 KB per page load
    Saves $0.15/mo

Compliance figures represent the statutory maximum fine for the most severe triggered category, capped per regulation — not the sum of per-finding penalties. Based on published regulatory fine ranges. This is not legal advice.

Compliance methodology · SEO assumptions · Bandwidth model

Your performance is already good — improvements may show diminishing returns

Unique monthly visitors from your analytics

Purchases, signups, or key actions

Optional — for revenue estimation

additional conversions/month

more engaged visitors from reduced bounce

potential monthly revenue
Current bounce (est.)
After fixes (est.)
Estimated bounce reduction

Fix 2 critical issues to capture this value

How this is calculated

Based on Google/Deloitte research ("Milliseconds Make Millions") showing a ~7% bounce rate increase per additional second of LCP above the 2.5s "Good" threshold.

Your site's LCP: → estimated after fixes.

These are estimates based on industry research — actual results vary

Bounce-rate model & assumptions

Your data stays in your browser — nothing is sent to our servers

Lighthouse

Mobile

81
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
96
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

1.32 s

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

5.02 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

42 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.003

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

1.81 s

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

5.18 s

Desktop

87
Performance Overall performance score (0–100) based on Core Web Vitals and other metrics. 90+ is good.
96
Accessibility Measures how accessible the page is for users with disabilities. Checks color contrast, ARIA labels, and semantic HTML.
100
Best Practices Checks for modern web development best practices including HTTPS, no console errors, and secure JavaScript.
100
SEO Measures basic SEO optimizations: meta tags, crawlability, link text, and mobile friendliness.

First Contentful Paint First Contentful Paint — how long until the browser renders the first piece of content. Under 1.8s is good.

512 ms

Largest Contentful Paint Largest Contentful Paint — how long until the largest visible element loads. Under 2.5s is good.

2.45 s

Total Blocking Time Total Blocking Time — total time the main thread was blocked, preventing user input. Under 200ms is good.

0 ms

Cumulative Layout Shift Cumulative Layout Shift — measures visual stability. How much the page layout shifts during loading. Under 0.1 is good.

0.002

Speed Index Speed Index — how quickly content is visually displayed during load. Under 3.4s is good.

636 ms

Time to Interactive Time to Interactive — how long until the page is fully interactive and responds to user input. Under 3.8s is good.

2.45 s

Categories

8
Avg score 84.9

How you compare

Where this site stands against peers running the same stack.

Bootstrap · 1080 peers
You 86
·
Avg 75
+11 above average
0 50 100
Security P94Performance P92Sustainability P90Accessibility P87Infrastructure P77Content P26SEO P72Compliance P30

Top 10% of Bootstrap sites score 95+ on Content; you're at 72 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 95% of Bootstrap sites See full Bootstrap benchmark →
Google Font API · 1377 peers
You 86
·
Avg 75
+11 above average
0 50 100
Security P95Performance P90Sustainability P89Accessibility P84Content P18Infrastructure P74SEO P72Compliance P37

Top 10% of Google Font API sites score 95+ on Content; you're at 72 — closing this gap is the highest-leverage improvement.

Better than 97% of Google Font API sites See full Google Font API benchmark →

Technology stack

Bootstrap, with Cloudflare CDN

8 technologies detected 2 stack layers 1 with CPE identifier Complex

Stack Architecture

Framework
Bootstrap Google Font API Google Maps HSTS
CDN
Cloudflare Netlify Netlify CDN cdnjs

All Detected Technologies (8)

Cloudflare is a web-infrastructure and website-security company, providing content-delivery-network services, DDoS mitigation, Internet security, and distributed domain-name-server services.

Categories CDN Website https://www.cloudflare.com Detected by BeaverCheck
This technology has a CPE identifier — check for known vulnerabilities Search NVD →

Netlify providers hosting and server-less backend services for web applications and static websites.

Categories PaaS, CDN Website https://www.netlify.com/ Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence Header: x-nf-request-id, Server: Netlify, Domain: .netlify.app
Categories CDN Website https://www.netlify.com Detected by BeaverCheck Evidence x-nf-request-id: 01M4B5NSAR4CFR3WNJZD8KPXK4

cdnjs is a free distributed JS library delivery service.

Categories CDN Website https://cdnjs.com Detected by BeaverCheck
Categories Framework Website https://getbootstrap.com Detected by BeaverCheck · Medium Evidence Found 3 Bootstrap class patterns in HTML

Google Font API is a web service that supports open-source font files that can be used on your web designs.

Categories Font scripts Website https://fonts.google.com/ Detected by BeaverCheck

Google Maps is a web mapping service. It offers satellite imagery, aerial photography, street maps, 360° interactive panoramic views of streets, real-time traffic conditions, and route planning for traveling by foot, car, bicycle and air, or public transportation.

Categories Maps Website https://maps.google.com Detected by BeaverCheck

HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS) informs browsers that the site should only be accessed using HTTPS.

Categories Security Website https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6797#section-6.1 Detected by BeaverCheck

Observations (2)

No build tool detected

A framework (Bootstrap) was detected but no bundler was identified. The build tool may not be detectable from output patterns, or the site may use the framework's built-in bundler.

Complex technology stack detected

8 technologies identified. A complex stack increases maintenance burden and attack surface. Consider whether all components are actively needed.

Show your score

Drop this badge on your README, marketing site, or status page. It auto-updates every time the audit re-runs and links back to this report.

BeaverCheck badge

This badge auto-updates with your latest scan result.

[![BeaverCheck](https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftmsarl.netlify.app)](https://beavercheck.com/sites/tmsarl.netlify.app)
<a href="https://beavercheck.com/sites/tmsarl.netlify.app"><img src="https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftmsarl.netlify.app" alt="BeaverCheck Score"></a>
https://beavercheck.com/badge?url=https%3A%2F%2Ftmsarl.netlify.app

Export & share

Download the audit, share with your team, or grab a fix plan ready to copy into your tracker.

Share

Copies markdown to clipboard

Export
Download Markdown Report Download JSON

Fix Plan

Three-week roadmap to ship the audit's findings, with one-click copy targets for your tracker.

Three-week fix plan

3 sprints · 17h total → projected A (91)

Sprint 1: Quick Wins

+1

Highest ROI — low effort, high impact

1 findings 0h → B (87)
  • · 7 third-party resources (46% of weight)

Sprint 2: Core Fixes

+2

Medium effort, high structural impact

2 findings 5h → B (89)
  • · Cross-Origin-Embedder-Policy header is missing
  • · 69 inline style attribute(s) detected

Sprint 3: Strategic Improvements

+2

Higher effort, long-term payoff

2 findings 12h → A (91)
  • · 'unsafe-eval' found in script source
  • · 'unsafe-inline' found in script source

Send Feedback